Home > Comparison > Technology > MSFT vs RBRK
The strategic rivalry between Microsoft Corporation and Rubrik, Inc. shapes the future of software infrastructure. Microsoft dominates as a diversified technology behemoth with cloud, productivity, and personal computing segments. Rubrik, a nimble cybersecurity innovator, focuses exclusively on data protection solutions. This analysis pits Microsoft’s scale and capital efficiency against Rubrik’s specialization and growth potential. I will determine which trajectory offers a superior risk-adjusted return for a well-diversified portfolio.
Table of contents
Companies Overview
Microsoft Corporation and Rubrik, Inc. stand as key players in the software infrastructure market with distinct scales and strategies.
Microsoft Corporation: Technology Giant with Diversified Software Ecosystem
Microsoft dominates the software infrastructure sector with a diversified revenue engine spanning cloud computing, productivity software, and personal computing devices. Its core strength lies in products like Azure, Office 365, and Windows, driving broad enterprise adoption. In 2026, Microsoft focuses strategically on expanding cloud services and AI integration to maintain its competitive advantage in intelligent cloud solutions.
Rubrik, Inc.: Emerging Leader in Data Security
Rubrik positions itself as a specialist in enterprise data protection and cyber recovery solutions. It generates revenue by securing unstructured, cloud, and SaaS data across multiple industries. In 2026, Rubrik prioritizes enhancing its data threat analytics and security posture offerings, aiming to carve out a niche in the fast-growing data security market with a lean, innovation-driven approach.
Strategic Collision: Similarities & Divergences
Microsoft embraces a broad software ecosystem with a cloud-first philosophy, while Rubrik pursues a focused, specialized security platform. Their battle centers on enterprise cloud infrastructure, where data security and cloud services overlap. Investors will find contrasting profiles: Microsoft’s scale and diversification versus Rubrik’s high-growth, niche specialization, reflecting different risk and opportunity dynamics in software infrastructure.
Income Statement Comparison
This data dissects the core profitability and scalability of both corporate engines to reveal who dominates the bottom line:
| Metric | Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) | Rubrik, Inc. (RBRK) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 282B | 887M |
| Cost of Revenue | 87.8B | 266M |
| Operating Expenses | 65.4B | 1.75B |
| Gross Profit | 194B | 621M |
| EBITDA | 160B | -1.08B |
| EBIT | 126B | -1.11B |
| Interest Expense | 2.39B | 41.3M |
| Net Income | 101.8B | -1.15B |
| EPS | 13.7 | -7.48 |
| Fiscal Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Income Statement Analysis: The Bottom-Line Duel
This income statement comparison reveals the true operational efficiency and profitability of Microsoft Corporation and Rubrik, Inc. over recent years.
Microsoft Corporation Analysis
Microsoft displays steady revenue growth, reaching $282B in 2025, with net income surging to $102B. Its gross margin remains robust at 68.8%, while net margin holds a healthy 36.2%. Microsoft’s latest year shows strong momentum, with EBIT and EPS growing over 13%, reflecting efficient cost management and solid market position.
Rubrik, Inc. Analysis
Rubrik’s revenue grows rapidly, hitting $887M in 2025, yet it records a net loss of $1.15B. Despite a favorable gross margin near 70%, Rubrik suffers from a deeply negative EBIT margin of -124.9% and net margin at -130.3%, indicating high operating expenses and ongoing unprofitability, which dampens its growth story.
Margin Strength vs. Growth Struggles
Microsoft leads with consistent profitability, strong margins, and expanding earnings, reflecting disciplined capital allocation and market dominance. Rubrik, while growing revenue fast, struggles with heavy losses and poor margin control. For investors, Microsoft’s profile offers a fundamentally sound, efficient business, whereas Rubrik remains a high-risk venture requiring cautious scrutiny.
Financial Ratios Comparison
These vital ratios act as a diagnostic tool to expose the underlying fiscal health, valuation premiums, and capital efficiency of Microsoft Corporation and Rubrik, Inc.:
| Ratios | Microsoft (MSFT) | Rubrik (RBRK) |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 29.6% | 208.6% |
| ROIC | 22.0% | -234.8% |
| P/E | 36.3 | -9.8 |
| P/B | 10.8 | -20.4 |
| Current Ratio | 1.35 | 1.13 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.35 | 1.13 |
| D/E | 0.18 | -0.63 |
| Debt-to-Assets | 9.8% | 24.7% |
| Interest Coverage | 53.9 | -27.5 |
| Asset Turnover | 0.46 | 0.62 |
| Fixed Asset Turnover | 1.23 | 16.7 |
| Payout ratio | 23.6% | 0% |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 0% |
| Fiscal Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Efficiency & Valuation Duel: The Vital Signs
Financial ratios act as a company’s DNA, exposing operational strengths and hidden risks that shape investor decisions.
Microsoft Corporation
Microsoft demonstrates strong profitability with a 29.65% ROE and a robust 36.15% net margin, signaling efficient operations. Its P/E ratio at 36.31 suggests a stretched valuation compared to the broader market. The company delivers modest dividends (0.65% yield) while investing heavily in R&D, fueling sustainable growth and shareholder value.
Rubrik, Inc.
Rubrik posts an extremely high ROE of 208.55%, but suffers from a severe negative net margin of -130.26%, indicating operational losses. Its negative P/E and P/B ratios reflect distressed valuation metrics. The firm pays no dividend, instead allocating capital to R&D and growth initiatives, though cash flow and interest coverage ratios raise caution about financial stability.
Profitability Strength vs. Valuation Stress
Microsoft presents a balanced profile with solid returns and justified premium valuation, reflecting steady operational execution and shareholder rewards. Rubrik’s ratios show high risk from poor profitability despite favorable growth investments. Conservative investors may prefer Microsoft’s stability, while risk-tolerant investors might explore Rubrik’s volatile growth potential.
Which one offers the Superior Shareholder Reward?
I compare Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Rubrik, Inc. (RBRK) focusing on their shareholder distributions. MSFT yields 0.65% with a 24% payout ratio, well-covered by free cash flow (FCF coverage ratio 1.54). Its buybacks are robust, enhancing returns sustainably. RBRK pays no dividend, suffers losses, and generates minimal free cash flow (FCF per share $0.2). Its buyback activity is negligible. MSFT’s balanced dividend and buyback strategy offers durable shareholder rewards. RBRK’s reinvestment in growth is unproven amid persistent losses. I conclude MSFT provides the superior total shareholder return profile for 2026 investors.
Comparative Score Analysis: The Strategic Profile
The radar chart reveals the fundamental DNA and trade-offs of Microsoft Corporation and Rubrik, Inc., highlighting their divergent financial strengths and weaknesses:
Microsoft shows a balanced profile with strong returns on equity (5) and assets (5), moderate debt-to-equity (3), and decent discounted cash flow (3). Rubrik leans heavily on return on equity (5) but struggles with asset efficiency (1) and carries high financial risk with weak debt-to-equity (1). Microsoft’s valuation appears stretched with low price-to-book (1), whereas Rubrik is uniformly undervalued but riskier.
Bankruptcy Risk: Solvency Showdown
Microsoft’s Altman Z-Score of 9.7 places it firmly in the safe zone, signaling robust financial stability. Rubrik’s score of 1.0 warns of distress and heightened bankruptcy risk in this economic cycle:
Financial Health: Quality of Operations
Microsoft’s Piotroski F-Score of 7 indicates strong internal financial health, reflecting solid profitability and operational efficiency. Rubrik’s score of 4 flags moderate concerns about financial quality and execution risks:
How are the two companies positioned?
This section dissects the operational DNA of Microsoft and Rubrik by comparing their revenue distribution and internal dynamics. The goal is to confront their economic moats and identify which model offers the most resilient, sustainable advantage today.
Revenue Segmentation: The Strategic Mix
This visual comparison dissects how Microsoft Corporation and Rubrik, Inc. diversify their income streams and where their primary sector bets lie:
Microsoft dwarfs Rubrik in scale and variety, with major revenue from Server Products and Tools at $98B and Microsoft 365 Commercial at $88B. Rubrik’s $829M subscription revenue anchors its modest base. Microsoft’s broad mix reduces concentration risk and fuels ecosystem lock-in, while Rubrik’s dependency on subscription services highlights growth potential but also higher vulnerability to market shifts.
Strengths and Weaknesses Comparison
This table compares the Strengths and Weaknesses of Microsoft Corporation and Rubrik, Inc.:
Microsoft Strengths
- Diversified revenue streams across cloud, gaming, enterprise, and devices
- Strong profitability with 36% net margin and 30% ROE
- Favorable leverage and liquidity ratios
- Extensive global presence with $144B US and $137B non-US sales
- Market leader in multiple software and cloud segments
Rubrik Strengths
- Favorable cost of capital with 5.6% WACC
- Strong ROE of 209% indicating high return on equity
- Favorable price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios
- Positive quick ratio and low debt-to-equity
- Focused subscription revenue with global sales across Americas, Asia Pacific, and EMEA
Microsoft Weaknesses
- Unfavorable high valuation multiples (PE 36.3, PB 10.8)
- Low dividend yield of 0.65%
- Unfavorable asset turnover at 0.46
- Neutral current ratio at 1.35, indicating moderate short-term liquidity
Rubrik Weaknesses
- Negative net margin (-130%) and ROIC (-235%) reflect operating losses
- Negative interest coverage signals difficulty servicing debt
- Zero dividend yield limits income for investors
- Higher debt-to-assets at 24.7% may increase financial risk
Microsoft benefits from scale, diversified product lines, and strong profitability but faces valuation concerns and moderate asset efficiency. Rubrik shows promising equity returns and global reach but struggles with profitability and debt servicing. These contrasts highlight strategic trade-offs between growth, profitability, and financial stability for each company.
The Moat Duel: Analyzing Competitive Defensibility
A structural moat shields long-term profits from relentless competitive pressure and market disruptions. Here’s how Microsoft and Rubrik stack up:
Microsoft Corporation: Ecosystem Lock-In with Intangible Assets
Microsoft’s moat stems from deep ecosystem lock-in and intangible assets like Office 365 and Azure. This manifests in high ROIC (above WACC by 13%) and stable margins near 37%. In 2026, cloud expansion and AI integration could deepen this moat despite a slight ROIC decline.
Rubrik, Inc.: Emerging Innovation with Cost Disadvantages
Rubrik relies on innovation in data security but lacks scale advantages. Its negative ROIC versus WACC signals value destruction and widening losses. Though revenue grows rapidly, profitability remains elusive. Expansion into new sectors may offer upside but risks remain high.
Ecosystem Dominance vs. Innovation Risk
Microsoft’s wider and more durable moat outclasses Rubrik’s fragile positioning. Its entrenched ecosystem and strong cash flows better defend market share against competitive threats. Rubrik’s high growth masks structural weaknesses and profitability challenges.
Which stock offers better returns?
Over the past 12 months, both Microsoft Corporation and Rubrik, Inc. exhibited significant price fluctuations, with Rubrik delivering a notably stronger upward trajectory despite recent pullbacks.
Trend Comparison
Microsoft’s stock price rose 1.67% over the past year, indicating a mild bullish trend with decelerating momentum and a high volatility of 41.8. Recently, it experienced a sharp 10.33% decline.
Rubrik’s stock surged 43.29% over the same period, reflecting a strong bullish trend with deceleration in acceleration. Volatility stood at 21.08, and recent months showed an 18.23% price drop.
Rubrik outperformed Microsoft significantly over the past year. Despite both facing recent downward pressure, Rubrik delivered the highest overall market returns.
Target Prices
Analysts present a bullish consensus for Microsoft Corporation and Rubrik, Inc., signaling significant upside potential.
| Company | Target Low | Target High | Consensus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Corporation | 450 | 675 | 600.04 |
| Rubrik, Inc. | 105 | 113 | 109.33 |
Microsoft’s target consensus at 600 contrasts sharply with its current price near 423, indicating a strong growth expectation. Rubrik’s targets more than double its current price around 54, reflecting high analyst optimism for this young tech player.
Don’t Let Luck Decide Your Entry Point
Optimize your entry points with our advanced ProRealTime indicators. You’ll get efficient buy signals with precise price targets for maximum performance. Start outperforming now!
How do institutions grade them?
Here is a summary of recent institutional grades for Microsoft Corporation and Rubrik, Inc.:
Microsoft Corporation Grades
The table below shows recent grades from recognized financial institutions for Microsoft Corporation.
| Grading Company | Action | New Grade | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citigroup | Maintain | Buy | 2026-01-30 |
| Wedbush | Maintain | Outperform | 2026-01-29 |
| Cantor Fitzgerald | Maintain | Overweight | 2026-01-29 |
| RBC Capital | Maintain | Outperform | 2026-01-29 |
| Stifel | Maintain | Buy | 2026-01-29 |
| DA Davidson | Maintain | Buy | 2026-01-29 |
| Keybanc | Maintain | Overweight | 2026-01-29 |
| Piper Sandler | Maintain | Overweight | 2026-01-29 |
| Evercore ISI Group | Maintain | Outperform | 2026-01-29 |
| Wells Fargo | Maintain | Overweight | 2026-01-29 |
Rubrik, Inc. Grades
The table below shows recent grades from recognized financial institutions for Rubrik, Inc.
| Grading Company | Action | New Grade | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keybanc | Maintain | Overweight | 2026-01-12 |
| Piper Sandler | Maintain | Overweight | 2026-01-05 |
| Citigroup | Maintain | Buy | 2025-12-08 |
| Piper Sandler | Maintain | Overweight | 2025-12-05 |
| Wedbush | Maintain | Outperform | 2025-12-05 |
| Baird | Maintain | Outperform | 2025-12-05 |
| William Blair | Upgrade | Outperform | 2025-12-05 |
| Rosenblatt | Maintain | Buy | 2025-12-05 |
| Keybanc | Maintain | Overweight | 2025-12-05 |
| BMO Capital | Maintain | Outperform | 2025-12-05 |
Which company has the best grades?
Microsoft Corporation consistently receives strong grades, mostly “Buy,” “Outperform,” and “Overweight,” from top-tier firms. Rubrik, Inc. also holds solid ratings but with fewer recent updates and slightly more “Overweight” than “Buy” ratings. Investors may interpret Microsoft’s higher frequency of “Buy” and “Outperform” as stronger institutional confidence.
Risks specific to each company
The following categories identify the critical pressure points and systemic threats facing both firms in the 2026 market environment:
1. Market & Competition
Microsoft Corporation
- Dominates with a broad product portfolio and strong cloud presence. Faces intense competition in infrastructure software.
Rubrik, Inc.
- Competes in a niche data security market but struggles with scale and brand recognition against established players.
2. Capital Structure & Debt
Microsoft Corporation
- Maintains low debt-to-equity at 0.18, with very strong interest coverage (52.8x). Capital structure is stable and conservative.
Rubrik, Inc.
- Negative debt-to-equity and poor interest coverage (-26.8) signal financial distress and high leverage risk.
3. Stock Volatility
Microsoft Corporation
- Beta of 1.08 indicates market-level volatility, suitable for moderate risk investors.
Rubrik, Inc.
- Beta of 0.32 suggests lower volatility but may reflect low liquidity and speculative trading.
4. Regulatory & Legal
Microsoft Corporation
- Faces significant regulatory scrutiny globally due to size and market dominance.
Rubrik, Inc.
- Operates in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, with compliance risks but less public scrutiny.
5. Supply Chain & Operations
Microsoft Corporation
- Complex global supply chain with diversified manufacturing and software delivery. Resilient but exposed to geopolitical disruptions.
Rubrik, Inc.
- Smaller scale limits operational complexity but reliance on third-party cloud infrastructure creates dependency risks.
6. ESG & Climate Transition
Microsoft Corporation
- Leads on ESG initiatives with ambitious net-zero targets and strong governance. Risks stem from technology sector scrutiny.
Rubrik, Inc.
- Emerging ESG practices. Faces pressure to formalize sustainability amid increasing investor focus.
7. Geopolitical Exposure
Microsoft Corporation
- High exposure due to global operations, including China and Europe, with risks from sanctions and trade tensions.
Rubrik, Inc.
- Primarily US-focused but vulnerable to supply chain disruptions and export controls affecting cloud services.
Which company shows a better risk-adjusted profile?
Microsoft’s dominant market position, strong capital structure, and safe Altman Z-Score (9.7) underpin a superior risk-adjusted profile. Rubrik’s key risk is its financial distress indicated by a distress zone Altman Z-Score (1.0) and poor leverage metrics. Microsoft’s moderate stock volatility and robust governance contrast with Rubrik’s smaller scale and operational fragility. I’m concerned that Rubrik’s negative margins and weak interest coverage expose it to solvency risk, while Microsoft’s main pressure lies in regulatory and geopolitical challenges.
Final Verdict: Which stock to choose?
Microsoft’s superpower lies in its unmatched capital efficiency and consistent value creation, driven by a robust economic moat and diversified revenue streams. Its slight decline in profitability is a point of vigilance. It suits portfolios targeting steady, long-term growth with moderate risk tolerance.
Rubrik’s strategic moat rests on high growth potential and innovation in cloud data management, offering a dynamic but volatile profile. Its financial instability and value destruction mark it as a riskier choice than Microsoft. It fits aggressive portfolios willing to tolerate short-term headwinds for possible outsized returns.
If you prioritize durable value creation and financial stability, Microsoft is the compelling choice due to its proven moat and strong cash flow generation. However, if you seek high-growth opportunities with tolerance for volatility, Rubrik offers superior upside potential despite its current challenges.
Disclaimer: Investment carries a risk of loss of initial capital. The past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Be sure to understand risks before making an investment decision.
Go Further
I encourage you to read the complete analyses of Microsoft Corporation and Rubrik, Inc. to enhance your investment decisions:
