QUALCOMM vs KLA: Which Semiconductor Stock Offers More Value?

Home > Comparison > Technology > QCOM vs KLAC

The strategic rivalry between QUALCOMM Incorporated and KLA Corporation shapes the semiconductor industry’s future. QUALCOMM, a technology giant, focuses on wireless communication and licensing intellectual property. KLA, a market leader, specializes in precision process control and yield management solutions. This analysis compares their distinct operational models to identify which offers superior risk-adjusted returns for a diversified portfolio amid evolving sector dynamics.

Table of contents

• Companies Overview
• Income Statement Comparison
• Financial Ratios Comparison
• How are the two companies positioned?
• Which stock offers better returns?
• How do institutions grade them?
• Risks specific to each company
• Final Verdict: Which stock to choose?

Companies Overview

QUALCOMM Incorporated and KLA Corporation are pivotal players shaping the semiconductor industry’s evolution.

QUALCOMM Incorporated: Wireless Technology Innovator

QUALCOMM dominates as a foundational technology provider for wireless communications. Its core revenue stems from licensing patents and selling integrated circuits for 3G to 5G technologies. In 2026, QUALCOMM focuses strategically on expanding its intellectual property portfolio and investing in emerging fields like AI and IoT through its strategic initiatives segment.

KLA Corporation: Semiconductor Process Control Leader

KLA specializes in process control and yield management solutions for semiconductor manufacturing. It generates revenue by selling inspection, metrology, and defect management systems critical for chip production. The company’s 2026 strategy emphasizes enhancing precision in advanced semiconductor and PCB manufacturing processes to drive quality and yield improvements.

Strategic Collision: Similarities & Divergences

Both companies anchor the semiconductor ecosystem but differ fundamentally: QUALCOMM controls wireless technology licensing and chip design, while KLA leads in manufacturing process optimization. They compete indirectly, with QUALCOMM pushing connectivity innovation and KLA advancing production efficiency. Their distinct investment profiles reflect QUALCOMM’s IP licensing strength versus KLA’s capital equipment specialization.

Income Statement Comparison

This data dissects the core profitability and scalability of both corporate engines to reveal who dominates the bottom line in their most recent fiscal year:

Metric	QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)	KLA Corporation (KLAC)
Revenue	44.3B	12.2B
Cost of Revenue	19.7B	4.6B
Operating Expenses	12.2B	2.3B
Gross Profit	24.5B	7.6B
EBITDA	14.9B	5.3B
EBIT	13.3B	4.9B
Interest Expense	664M	302M
Net Income	5.5B	4.1B
EPS	5.06	30.53
Fiscal Year	2025	2025

Income Statement Analysis: The Bottom-Line Duel

This income statement comparison reveals the true efficiency and profitability dynamics of QUALCOMM Incorporated and KLA Corporation’s corporate engines.

QUALCOMM Incorporated Analysis

QUALCOMM’s revenue climbs steadily from $33.6B in 2021 to $44.3B in 2025, showing a 32% growth over five years. However, net income declines sharply from $9B in 2021 to $5.5B in 2025, indicating margin compression. Its gross margin remains solid around 55%, but net margin drops below 13%, reflecting rising costs and tax expenses. The latest year shows strong revenue and EBIT growth, yet net income and EPS falter, signaling efficiency challenges.

KLA Corporation Analysis

KLA exhibits robust revenue growth from $6.9B in 2021 to $12.2B in 2025, surging 76% over five years. Net income almost doubles from $2.1B to $4.1B, with net margins improving to 33%, showcasing excellent profitability. Gross margin stands at a high 62%, while EBIT margin exceeds 40%, highlighting operational efficiency. In 2025, KLA accelerates revenue and profit growth, supported by expanding margins and strong EPS gains, reflecting solid momentum and capital discipline.

Margin Strength vs. Growth Momentum

KLA outperforms QUALCOMM in both margin expansion and net income growth over the recent years. QUALCOMM’s revenue scale is larger, but margin erosion and net income decline raise concerns. KLA’s combination of accelerating top-line growth and rising profitability defines a cleaner fundamental winner. Investors favor KLA’s profile for its superior efficiency and consistent earnings momentum.

Financial Ratios Comparison

These vital ratios act as a diagnostic tool to expose the underlying fiscal health, valuation premiums, and capital efficiency of the companies analyzed:

Ratios	QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)	KLA Corporation (KLAC)
ROE	26.1%	86.6%
ROIC	13.2%	38.0%
P/E	32.7	29.3
P/B	8.54	25.39
Current Ratio	2.82	2.62
Quick Ratio	2.10	1.83
D/E	0.70	1.30
Debt-to-Assets	29.5%	37.9%
Interest Coverage	18.6	17.3
Asset Turnover	0.88	0.76
Fixed Asset Turnover	9.44	9.70
Payout Ratio	68.7%	22.3%
Dividend Yield	2.10%	0.76%
Fiscal Year	2025	2025

Efficiency & Valuation Duel: The Vital Signs

Ratios act as a company’s DNA, exposing hidden risks and operational strength crucial for informed investment decisions.

QUALCOMM Incorporated

QUALCOMM posts a solid 26.1% ROE and a 12.5% net margin, signaling robust profitability. Its P/E of 32.7 and P/B of 8.54 suggest a stretched valuation relative to earnings and book value. The 2.1% dividend yield supports shareholder returns, balancing reinvestment in R&D with steady income.

KLA Corporation

KLA excels with an extraordinary 86.6% ROE and a 33.4% net margin, demonstrating exceptional efficiency. Despite a slightly lower P/E of 29.3, its P/B of 25.4 flags an expensive stock. Dividend yield at 0.76% is low, reflecting a preference for growth reinvestment over immediate payouts.

Premium Valuation vs. Operational Safety

KLA’s operational metrics shine but come with a premium valuation and higher leverage risk. QUALCOMM offers a more balanced risk-reward profile with favorable profitability and a stronger dividend. Growth-focused investors may prefer KLA, while those seeking steadier returns might lean toward QUALCOMM.

Which one offers the Superior Shareholder Reward?

I see QUALCOMM (QCOM) offers a 2.1% dividend yield with a payout ratio near 69%, supported by strong free cash flow coverage (2.8x). It balances dividends with consistent buybacks, fueling steady shareholder returns. KLA Corporation (KLAC) yields only 0.76% with a lower payout ratio (~22%) but invests heavily in buybacks and retains significant free cash flow for growth. Historically, QCOM’s higher yield and sustainable payout, combined with solid buybacks, deliver a more attractive total return profile in 2026. KLAC’s model suits growth-focused investors but lacks immediate income appeal. I conclude QCOM offers superior shareholder reward for income and total return seekers this year.

Comparative Score Analysis: The Strategic Profile

The radar chart reveals the fundamental DNA and trade-offs of QUALCOMM Incorporated and KLA Corporation, illustrating their financial strengths and vulnerabilities:

QUALCOMM and KLA show parity in overall scores, both scoring 3, but their profiles differ. QUALCOMM edges KLA in discounted cash flow (4 vs. 3), suggesting better future cash flow expectations. Both excel equally in ROE and ROA (5 each), indicating strong profitability and asset efficiency. Yet, both struggle with high debt-to-equity risk (score 1) and undervaluation risks (low P/E and P/B). QUALCOMM’s stronger DCF score hints at a growth advantage, while KLA maintains a more balanced but moderate valuation profile.

Bankruptcy Risk: Solvency Showdown

QUALCOMM’s Altman Z-Score of 6.11 versus KLA’s 12.62 places both comfortably in the safe zone, though KLA’s far superior score signals a stronger buffer against financial distress in this cycle:

Financial Health: Quality of Operations

KLA’s Piotroski F-Score of 8 surpasses QUALCOMM’s 7, indicating KLA operates with slightly stronger internal financial health. This suggests KLA has fewer red flags in profitability, leverage, and efficiency metrics:

How are the two companies positioned?

This section dissects the operational DNA of QUALCOMM and KLA by comparing their revenue distribution by segment and internal dynamics. The final goal is to confront their economic moats to identify which business model offers the most resilient, sustainable competitive advantage today.

Revenue Segmentation: The Strategic Mix

This comparison dissects how QUALCOMM Incorporated and KLA Corporation diversify income streams and where their primary sector bets lie:

QUALCOMM anchors its revenue in QCT at $38.4B, with QTL contributing a smaller $5.6B, showing a strong concentration in chipset sales. KLA spreads revenue more evenly, with Defect Inspection at $6.2B and Service at $2.7B anchoring its mix, alongside Patterning and Specialty Semiconductor segments. KLA’s diversification reduces concentration risk, while QUALCOMM’s dominance in QCT signals dependency but also ecosystem lock-in.

Strengths and Weaknesses Comparison

This table compares the Strengths and Weaknesses of QUALCOMM and KLA Corporation based on diversification, profitability, financials, innovation, global presence, and market share:

QUALCOMM exhibits balanced strengths in profitability and liquidity with a diversified global footprint. KLA delivers superior profitability but carries higher leverage and valuation risks. Each company’s profile suggests different strategic priorities in managing growth and financial risk.

The Moat Duel: Analyzing Competitive Defensibility

A structural moat is the only barrier protecting long-term profits from relentless competitive erosion. Let’s dissect how these two giants defend their turf:

QUALCOMM Incorporated: Intangible Asset Fortress

QUALCOMM’s patent portfolio creates a powerful intangible asset moat. This drives stable licensing revenues and a solid 30% EBIT margin. However, declining ROIC signals pressure from industry shifts in 2026.

KLA Corporation: Technological Process Edge

KLA’s moat stems from its specialized process control tech, delivering a superior 40% EBIT margin and rising ROIC. Its expanding footprint in advanced semiconductor inspection deepens its moat going into 2026.

Patent Licensing vs. Process Innovation: Which Moat Holds Stronger?

KLA’s growing ROIC and margin expansion reveal a wider, more durable moat than QUALCOMM’s shrinking profitability. KLA appears better positioned to defend and extend its market dominance.

Which stock offers better returns?

The stock prices of QUALCOMM Incorporated and KLA Corporation have diverged significantly over the past year, reflecting contrasting trading dynamics and momentum.

Trend Comparison

QUALCOMM’s stock declined by 11.13% over the past 12 months, indicating a bearish trend with deceleration. Its price ranged between 127.46 and 215.33, showing moderate volatility.

KLA’s stock surged 104.22% over the same period, marking a strong bullish trend with acceleration. Price volatility was high, swinging from 576.53 to 1567.82, reflecting rapid gains.

KLA outperformed QUALCOMM substantially, delivering the highest market returns with a robust upward trend compared to QUALCOMM’s bearish trajectory.

Target Prices

Analysts present a cautiously optimistic consensus for QUALCOMM Incorporated and KLA Corporation.

Company	Target Low	Target High	Consensus
QUALCOMM Incorporated	160	210	182.5
KLA Corporation	1400	1900	1672.25

The consensus target prices for QCOM and KLAC sit well above their current stock prices, signaling analyst confidence in significant upside potential.

How do institutions grade them?

Here is a comparison of recent institutional grades for QUALCOMM Incorporated and KLA Corporation:

QUALCOMM Incorporated Grades

The table below summarizes recent grades from reputable institutions for QUALCOMM Incorporated.

Grading Company	Action	New Grade	Date
UBS	Maintain	Neutral	2026-01-26
Mizuho	Maintain	Neutral	2026-01-26
Mizuho	Downgrade	Neutral	2026-01-09
B of A Securities	Maintain	Buy	2025-11-06
Rosenblatt	Maintain	Buy	2025-11-06
Wells Fargo	Maintain	Underweight	2025-11-06
Mizuho	Maintain	Outperform	2025-11-06
Piper Sandler	Maintain	Overweight	2025-11-06
UBS	Maintain	Neutral	2025-11-06
JP Morgan	Maintain	Overweight	2025-11-04

KLA Corporation Grades

The table below shows recent grades from reliable institutions for KLA Corporation.

Grading Company	Action	New Grade	Date
Oppenheimer	Maintain	Outperform	2026-01-30
Barclays	Maintain	Overweight	2026-01-30
Cantor Fitzgerald	Maintain	Overweight	2026-01-30
Jefferies	Maintain	Buy	2026-01-30
Stifel	Maintain	Buy	2026-01-30
Wells Fargo	Maintain	Overweight	2026-01-30
Needham	Maintain	Buy	2026-01-30
RBC Capital	Maintain	Sector Perform	2026-01-30
Deutsche Bank	Maintain	Hold	2026-01-21
Needham	Maintain	Buy	2026-01-20

Which company has the best grades?

KLA Corporation consistently earns higher grades such as Outperform and Overweight, indicating stronger institutional confidence. QUALCOMM’s grades are more mixed, with several Neutral and Underweight ratings. Investors may view KLA’s superior grades as a sign of relatively better market sentiment.

Risks specific to each company

The following categories identify the critical pressure points and systemic threats facing both firms in the 2026 market environment:

1. Market & Competition

2. Capital Structure & Debt

3. Stock Volatility

4. Regulatory & Legal

5. Supply Chain & Operations

6. ESG & Climate Transition

7. Geopolitical Exposure

Which company shows a better risk-adjusted profile?

QUALCOMM’s most impactful risk is regulatory and legal uncertainty around its licensing business, which could disrupt revenue streams. KLA’s largest risk lies in its elevated leverage combined with cyclical industry exposure affecting stock volatility. Despite QUALCOMM’s regulatory headwinds, it presents a more balanced risk profile with moderate debt and stable liquidity. KLA’s higher debt and stock volatility increase risk, despite superior profitability metrics. Recent sharp share price decline for KLA (-15%) underscores market concerns over its capital structure and cyclicality. Therefore, I view QUALCOMM as having a better risk-adjusted profile in 2026.

Final Verdict: Which stock to choose?

QUALCOMM’s superpower lies in its resilient cash generation and efficient capital use, underpinning a solid value-creation track record. Its declining ROIC trend is a point of vigilance, suggesting caution on sustained profitability. It suits portfolios seeking steady income with moderate growth exposure.

KLA stands out with a robust strategic moat driven by escalating ROIC and expanding profitability, reflecting durable competitive advantage. It offers a more dynamic growth profile with stronger margin expansion but carries a higher valuation premium and leverage risk. This fits well with Growth at a Reasonable Price (GARP) investors.

If you prioritize consistent cash flow and a defensive stance, QUALCOMM is the compelling choice due to its stable value creation and healthy liquidity. However, if you seek accelerated growth backed by a durable moat and can tolerate valuation and leverage premiums, KLA offers better upside potential and superior profitability momentum.

Disclaimer: Investment carries a risk of loss of initial capital. The past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Be sure to understand risks before making an investment decision.

Go Further

I encourage you to read the complete analyses of QUALCOMM Incorporated and KLA Corporation to enhance your investment decisions:

• QUALCOMM Incorporated Analysis
• KLA Corporation Analysis