Home > Comparison > Technology > ANET vs STX
The strategic rivalry between Arista Networks, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc shapes the Technology sector’s hardware landscape. Arista operates as a specialized cloud networking innovator, while Seagate commands mass capacity storage solutions globally. This head-to-head pits focused network agility against broad storage scale. This analysis aims to identify which company’s trajectory delivers superior risk-adjusted returns for a diversified portfolio in today’s evolving tech environment.
Table of contents
Companies Overview
Arista Networks and Seagate Technology anchor critical segments within the global computer hardware industry.
Arista Networks, Inc.: Cloud Networking Pioneer
Arista Networks dominates cloud networking solutions with extensible operating systems and gigabit Ethernet platforms. Its revenue depends on selling hardware and software to internet companies, financial firms, and government entities. In 2026, Arista sharpened its strategic focus on expanding post-contract support services and direct sales channels to strengthen customer retention and recurring revenue streams.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc: Data Storage Innovator
Seagate Technology leads in mass capacity storage products, including enterprise HDDs, SSDs, and external drives. Its core revenue engine revolves around supplying OEMs and retailers worldwide with data storage solutions. In 2026, Seagate emphasized growth in its Lyve edge-to-cloud platform and diversified storage offerings to capture evolving data demands across industries.
Strategic Collision: Similarities & Divergences
Both companies operate in technology hardware yet adopt distinct philosophies: Arista centers on cloud networking ecosystems, while Seagate focuses on scalable storage infrastructure. Their primary battleground lies in serving enterprise clients seeking reliable data management and networking. Arista offers a high-margin, software-centric model; Seagate balances hardware volume with innovation, defining contrasting investment risk and growth profiles.
Income Statement Comparison
This data dissects the core profitability and scalability of both corporate engines to reveal who dominates the bottom line:
| Metric | Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) | Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 7B | 9.1B |
| Cost of Revenue | 2.5B | 5.9B |
| Operating Expenses | 1.5B | 1.3B |
| Gross Profit | 4.5B | 3.2B |
| EBITDA | 3B | 2.1B |
| EBIT | 2.9B | 1.8B |
| Interest Expense | 0 | 321M |
| Net Income | 2.9B | 1.5B |
| EPS | 2.27 | 6.93 |
| Fiscal Year | 2024 | 2025 |
Income Statement Analysis: The Bottom-Line Duel
This income statement comparison reveals which company converts revenue into profit most efficiently, exposing the strength of their corporate engines.
Arista Networks, Inc. Analysis
Arista Networks has grown revenue from 2.3B in 2020 to 7B in 2024, with net income surging from 635M to 2.85B. Its gross margin stays robust at 64%, and net margin stands at an impressive 40.7%, reflecting excellent cost control and high profitability. In 2024, Arista’s EBIT margin jumped 30%, signaling strong operating momentum.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc Analysis
Seagate’s revenue declined overall from 11B in 2022 to 9.1B in 2025 but rebounded sharply last year with a 39% rise. Net income improved from a loss of 529M in 2023 to 1.47B in 2025. Despite a lower gross margin of 35% and net margin of 16%, Seagate’s recent margin expansion and 108% gross profit growth show a powerful recovery phase.
Margin Power vs. Revenue Scale
Arista Networks leads with superior margins and consistent growth, turning revenue into profit efficiently. Seagate shows stronger recent revenue growth but from a weaker margin base and volatile earnings. For investors prioritizing profitability and margin stability, Arista’s profile offers a clearer edge over Seagate’s high-momentum, lower-margin rebound.
Financial Ratios Comparison
These vital ratios serve as a diagnostic tool to expose underlying fiscal health, valuation premiums, and capital efficiency across companies:
| Ratios | Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) | Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 28.5% | -3.24% |
| ROIC | 22.7% | 33.8% |
| P/E | 48.7 | 20.4 |
| P/B | 13.9 | -66.2 |
| Current Ratio | 4.36 | 1.38 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.69 | 0.84 |
| D/E | 0 | -11.9 (negative, indicating negative equity) |
| Debt-to-Assets | 0 | 67.0% |
| Interest Coverage | 0 | 5.89 |
| Asset Turnover | 0.50 | 1.13 |
| Fixed Asset Turnover | 70.8 | 5.49 |
| Payout ratio | 0 | 40.8% |
| Dividend yield | 0 | 2.00% |
| Fiscal Year | 2024 | 2025 |
Efficiency & Valuation Duel: The Vital Signs
Financial ratios serve as a company’s DNA, uncovering hidden risks and operational strength that raw numbers alone cannot reveal.
Arista Networks, Inc.
Arista delivers strong profitability with a 28.54% ROE and a robust 40.73% net margin, signaling operational excellence. Yet, its valuation is stretched, trading at a high 48.69 P/E and 13.89 P/B, reflecting premium pricing. The company does not pay dividends but reinvests heavily in R&D, fueling growth and sustaining its moat.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Seagate posts a mixed profitability profile with a negative ROE of -324.28%, despite a favorable 33.76% ROIC and a solid 16.15% net margin. Its valuation is moderate at a 20.41 P/E, and it offers a 2.0% dividend yield, balancing shareholder returns with capital discipline. Debt levels are high, raising risk but also supporting operational capacity.
Premium Valuation vs. Operational Stability
While Arista commands a premium valuation for its superior profitability and growth reinvestment, Seagate offers a more balanced valuation with income via dividends but carries elevated leverage and negative ROE. Investors seeking growth might favor Arista’s profile, whereas those prioritizing income and capital structure may find Seagate’s metrics more fitting.
Which one offers the Superior Shareholder Reward?
I see Arista Networks (ANET) pays no dividends but generates strong free cash flow of 2.9/share and maintains zero debt, enabling robust reinvestment and buybacks. Seagate Technology (STX) yields ~2.7%, with a payout ratio near 40%, but carries high debt and weaker margins. ANET’s buyback capacity and growth-focused capital allocation offer a more sustainable and attractive total return profile in 2026. STX’s dividend provides income but risks financial strain. I favor ANET for superior long-term shareholder reward.
Comparative Score Analysis: The Strategic Profile
The radar chart reveals the fundamental DNA and trade-offs of Arista Networks and Seagate Technology, highlighting their distinct strategic strengths and weaknesses:
Arista Networks excels in profitability metrics, showing very favorable ROE and ROA scores. However, it struggles with valuation and leverage, reflected in very unfavorable debt-to-equity and price multiples. Seagate offers a more balanced profile with slightly lower DCF and better P/E valuation, though it shares the same leverage risk. Investors seeking operational efficiency may favor Arista, while those prioritizing valuation balance might lean toward Seagate.
Bankruptcy Risk: Solvency Showdown
Arista Networks’ Altman Z-Score of 20.6 vastly exceeds Seagate’s 7.3, placing both safely above distress zones but illustrating Arista’s superior financial resilience and lower bankruptcy risk in this cycle:
Financial Health: Quality of Operations
Seagate’s Piotroski score of 7 signals stronger internal financial health compared to Arista’s 5, suggesting Seagate maintains better operational quality and fewer red flags in profitability, liquidity, and efficiency metrics:
How are the two companies positioned?
This section dissects the operational DNA of Arista Networks and Seagate Technology by comparing their revenue distribution and internal dynamics. The goal is to confront their economic moats to identify which model offers the most resilient, sustainable competitive advantage today.
Revenue Segmentation: The Strategic Mix
This visual comparison dissects how Arista Networks, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc diversify income streams and highlights their primary sector bets:
Arista Networks anchors revenue in Products with $5.9B in 2024, while Services add $1.1B, showing a moderately diversified mix. Seagate Technology lacks available segmentation data, preventing direct comparison. Arista’s product dominance reflects infrastructure leadership and ecosystem lock-in, but it also signals reliance on hardware sales. The growing services segment hints at strategic expansion to reduce concentration risk and enhance recurring revenue stability.
Strengths and Weaknesses Comparison
This table compares the Strengths and Weaknesses of Arista Networks, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc:
ANET Strengths
- High net margin at 40.73%
- Strong ROE of 28.54%
- Zero debt with infinite interest coverage
- Robust fixed asset turnover of 70.85
- Quick ratio favorable at 3.69
- Global revenue diversified across Americas, EMEA, Asia Pacific
STX Strengths
- Solid net margin at 16.15%
- Very high ROIC at 33.76%
- Favorable PB ratio despite negative debt/equity
- Interest coverage at 5.71
- Strong asset turnover of 1.13
- Diversified global presence including US, Singapore, Netherlands
ANET Weaknesses
- High WACC at 10.46%
- Overvalued PE at 48.69
- High current ratio at 4.36 may indicate inefficient asset use
- Low asset turnover at 0.5
- No dividend yield
- PB ratio extremely high at 13.89
STX Weaknesses
- Negative ROE at -324.28% signals profitability concerns
- High debt-to-assets at 66.97%
- Neutral current and quick ratios indicate moderate liquidity
- Moderate PE valuation at 20.41
- Negative debt/equity suggests accounting complexities
Both companies show favorable overall financial health but face distinct challenges. Arista excels in profitability and low leverage but has valuation and efficiency concerns. Seagate shows strong operational efficiency and global reach but struggles with profitability and higher leverage, impacting strategic flexibility.
The Moat Duel: Analyzing Competitive Defensibility
A structural moat is the only shield protecting long-term profits from relentless competition and market disruption. Let’s dissect the defensive barriers of two tech hardware giants:
Arista Networks, Inc.: Superior Switching Costs and Innovation Moat
Arista’s moat stems from high switching costs embedded in its cloud networking ecosystem. Its 64% gross margin and 40% net margin reflect strong pricing power and operational efficiency. Expanding into new markets and upgrading platforms in 2026 should deepen this moat.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc: Cost Advantage with Scale and Product Breadth
Seagate leverages a cost advantage from massive scale and diversified storage solutions. Its 35% gross margin and growing ROIC confirm operational strength, though lower than Arista’s. Innovations in mass capacity storage and edge-to-cloud platforms offer fresh growth avenues in 2026.
Moat Strength Showdown: Switching Costs vs. Scale Efficiency
Both companies boast very favorable moats with rising ROIC trends. However, Arista’s higher margins and robust switching costs create a wider, more durable moat. I see Arista better positioned to defend and grow market share against intensifying competition.
Which stock offers better returns?
Over the past 12 months, both Arista Networks and Seagate Technology showed strong price appreciation, with Seagate exhibiting a more pronounced acceleration and higher volatility.
Trend Comparison
Arista Networks delivered a 107.59% price increase over the past year, maintaining a bullish trend with accelerating momentum and moderate volatility (24.74 std deviation).
Seagate Technology surged 339.84% in the same period, also bullish with accelerating momentum but accompanied by much higher volatility (73.81 std deviation).
Seagate outperformed Arista significantly, delivering the highest market returns with stronger upward acceleration and greater buyer dominance in recent months.
Target Prices
Analysts show a bullish consensus for Arista Networks and Seagate Technology with solid upside potential.
| Company | Target Low | Target High | Consensus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arista Networks, Inc. | 150 | 183 | 163 |
| Seagate Technology Holdings plc | 270 | 505 | 407.2 |
Arista’s consensus target of 163 exceeds its current 141.74 price, signaling potential growth. Seagate’s target consensus of 407.2 aligns closely with its 407.69 price, suggesting limited near-term upside.
Don’t Let Luck Decide Your Entry Point
Optimize your entry points with our advanced ProRealTime indicators. You’ll get efficient buy signals with precise price targets for maximum performance. Start outperforming now!
How do institutions grade them?
The following tables summarize recent institutional grades for Arista Networks, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc:
Arista Networks, Inc. Grades
This table presents the latest grades and rating actions from known grading companies for Arista Networks.
| Grading Company | Action | New Grade | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Piper Sandler | Upgrade | Overweight | 2026-01-05 |
| Morgan Stanley | Maintain | Overweight | 2025-12-17 |
| Piper Sandler | Maintain | Neutral | 2025-11-05 |
| Rosenblatt | Maintain | Neutral | 2025-11-05 |
| Barclays | Maintain | Overweight | 2025-11-05 |
| Morgan Stanley | Maintain | Overweight | 2025-10-10 |
| Needham | Maintain | Buy | 2025-09-16 |
| Goldman Sachs | Maintain | Buy | 2025-09-12 |
| Melius Research | Maintain | Buy | 2025-09-12 |
| Wells Fargo | Maintain | Overweight | 2025-09-12 |
Seagate Technology Holdings plc Grades
This table shows recent ratings and grading actions from reputable firms for Seagate Technology.
| Grading Company | Action | New Grade | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citigroup | Maintain | Buy | 2026-01-29 |
| Baird | Maintain | Outperform | 2026-01-29 |
| Rosenblatt | Maintain | Buy | 2026-01-28 |
| Wells Fargo | Maintain | Equal Weight | 2026-01-28 |
| UBS | Maintain | Neutral | 2026-01-28 |
| Cantor Fitzgerald | Maintain | Overweight | 2026-01-28 |
| Mizuho | Maintain | Outperform | 2026-01-28 |
| Goldman Sachs | Maintain | Buy | 2026-01-28 |
| Barclays | Maintain | Equal Weight | 2026-01-28 |
| Mizuho | Maintain | Outperform | 2026-01-27 |
Which company has the best grades?
Arista Networks has received consistently positive grades, predominantly “Buy” and “Overweight,” including an upgrade by Piper Sandler. Seagate’s grades include “Buy,” “Outperform,” and several “Equal Weight” ratings. Arista’s stronger consensus may indicate higher institutional confidence, potentially influencing investor sentiment and demand more positively.
Risks specific to each company
The following categories identify the critical pressure points and systemic threats facing both firms in the 2026 market environment:
1. Market & Competition
Arista Networks, Inc.
- Faces intense competition in cloud networking with rapid technological shifts.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
- Competes in mass storage with risks from SSD innovations and price commoditization.
2. Capital Structure & Debt
Arista Networks, Inc.
- Debt-free, providing financial flexibility and low risk of distress.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
- High debt-to-assets ratio (67%) signals elevated financial leverage and risk.
3. Stock Volatility
Arista Networks, Inc.
- Beta of 1.41 indicates above-market volatility but manageable for growth investors.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
- Higher beta of 1.62 reflects greater sensitivity to market swings and risk.
4. Regulatory & Legal
Arista Networks, Inc.
- Technology sector exposure to data security regulations and trade policies.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
- Subject to global data storage compliance and international trade regulations.
5. Supply Chain & Operations
Arista Networks, Inc.
- Relies on global suppliers for networking hardware; geopolitical tensions could disrupt supply.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
- Supply chain complexity in multiple countries raises operational risk and costs.
6. ESG & Climate Transition
Arista Networks, Inc.
- Increasing pressure to reduce carbon footprint in data center hardware.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
- Faces challenges adapting legacy manufacturing to sustainable practices.
7. Geopolitical Exposure
Arista Networks, Inc.
- US-based with significant international sales; sensitive to US-China trade tensions.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
- Ireland headquarters with global operations; exposed to EU regulations and US-China dynamics.
Which company shows a better risk-adjusted profile?
Arista Networks faces competitive and regulatory risks but benefits from a pristine balance sheet and moderate volatility. Seagate’s leverage and geopolitical exposure heighten its financial risk despite strong asset returns. Arista’s debt-free status and safer Altman Z-score provide a superior risk-adjusted profile in 2026. The key concern for Arista is market competition, while Seagate’s heavy debt load and operational complexity dominate its risk outlook.
Final Verdict: Which stock to choose?
Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) wields unmatched efficiency in capital allocation, consistently generating returns well above its cost of capital. Its robust profitability and nearly debt-free balance sheet underpin this strength. A point of vigilance remains its elevated valuation multiples, suggesting premium pricing. ANET suits aggressive growth portfolios seeking durable tech moats.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) commands a strategic moat through solid free cash flow generation and a resilient asset turnover. Its recurring revenue streams support steady operations, offering comparatively better safety amid market volatility. STX fits well in GARP portfolios that balance growth potential with reasonable valuation and income yield.
If you prioritize long-term growth driven by capital efficiency and technological leadership, ANET is the compelling choice due to its strong moat and profitability. However, if you seek a more stable investment with better income potential and valuation discipline, STX offers better stability and a cash-generative business model. Each stock appeals to distinct investor profiles requiring careful alignment with risk tolerance.
Disclaimer: Investment carries a risk of loss of initial capital. The past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Be sure to understand risks before making an investment decision.
Go Further
I encourage you to read the complete analyses of Arista Networks, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc to enhance your investment decisions:
