Home > Analyses > Technology > Figma, Inc.

Figma, Inc. revolutionizes how teams design and build digital products by delivering seamless, browser-based collaboration tools. Its flagship platform, Figma Design, empowers designers and developers to ideate, prototype, and align in real time, reshaping product workflows globally. Renowned for innovation and user-centric quality, Figma commands a leading position in application software. The key question remains: can Figma sustain its rapid growth amid evolving market pressures and justify its current valuation?

Figma, Inc. Analysis
Table of contents

Business Model & Company Overview

Figma, Inc., founded in 2012 and headquartered in San Francisco, commands a leading position in the software application sector. Its browser-based platform unites design and development teams through tools like Figma Design, Dev Mode, FigJam, and Figma Slides, creating a seamless ecosystem that accelerates product innovation and collaboration globally.

The company’s revenue engine balances subscription-based software services with cutting-edge AI features, driving recurring income across the Americas, Europe, and Asia. Figma’s integrated suite fosters user engagement and retention, building a deep economic moat that positions it as a pivotal player shaping the future of interface design.

Financial Performance & Fundamental Metrics

I analyze Figma, Inc.’s income statement, key financial ratios, and dividend payout policy to reveal its operational strength and shareholder return strategy.

Income Statement

The following table summarizes Figma, Inc.’s income statement data for fiscal years 2023 through 2025, highlighting key profitability and expense metrics.

income statement
202320242025
Revenue505M749M1.06B
Cost of Revenue45M88M186M
Operating Expenses534M1.54B2.16B
Gross Profit460M661M870M
EBITDA-65M-870M-1.29B
EBIT-73M-877M0
Interest Expense000
Net Income286M-732M-1.25B
EPS0.59-3.11-3.71
Filing Date2023-12-312024-12-312026-02-18

Income Statement Evolution

From 2023 to 2025, Figma’s revenue more than doubled, reaching $1.06B in 2025. Gross profit grew substantially, maintaining a strong 82.4% margin. However, net income deteriorated sharply, swinging from a $286M profit in 2023 to a $1.25B loss in 2025, causing net margins to plunge into deeply negative territory.

Is the Income Statement Favorable?

In 2025, despite robust revenue growth of 41% and stable gross margins, operating expenses outpaced revenues, driving a severe operating loss of $1.29B. Net margin declined to -118%, reflecting high costs and negative earnings per share of -$3.71. Interest expenses remain zero, but overall fundamentals are mixed, showing strong top-line growth but weak profitability.

Financial Ratios

The following table summarizes key financial ratios for Figma, Inc. over the last three fiscal years:

Ratios202320242025
Net Margin57%-98%-118%
ROE27%-55%-83%
ROIC-5%-60%-82%
P/E197-71-10
P/B54398
Current Ratio2.823.662.58
Quick Ratio2.823.662.58
D/E0.0140.0220.039
Debt-to-Assets0.0090.016-1.67
Interest Coverage000
Asset Turnover0.320.42-30.10
Fixed Asset Turnover43.4017.0924.95
Dividend Yield000

Evolution of Financial Ratios

From 2023 to 2025, Figma’s Return on Equity (ROE) deteriorated sharply, turning negative by 2025 at -82.78%. The Current Ratio declined from 3.66 in 2024 to 2.58 in 2025, indicating reduced but still solid liquidity. The Debt-to-Equity Ratio remained very low and stable around 0.04, reflecting minimal leverage. Profitability weakened significantly, with net margins dropping below -118%.

Are the Financial Ratios Favorable?

In 2025, Figma’s profitability ratios, including ROE and net margin, are unfavorable, signaling losses and weak returns. Liquidity ratios like current and quick ratios stand favorable, showing good short-term financial health. Leverage is minimal and favorable with a very low debt-to-equity ratio. Asset turnover is negative, indicating operational inefficiency. The overall ratio assessment is neutral, split evenly between favorable and unfavorable metrics.

Shareholder Return Policy

Figma, Inc. does not pay dividends, reflecting its negative net income and prioritization of reinvestment. The company focuses on growth, allocating cash to operations and capital expenditures rather than shareholder distributions, with no share buyback programs reported.

This approach aligns with long-term value creation for shareholders if growth investments generate future profitability. However, the absence of returns requires investors to trust management’s capital allocation amid ongoing losses and negative profit margins.

Score analysis

The following radar chart illustrates Figma, Inc.’s key financial metric scores to highlight its performance across valuation and profitability measures:

score analysis

Figma scores favorably on discounted cash flow (4) and debt-to-equity (4), indicating solid valuation and leverage management. However, profitability and valuation metrics such as ROE (1), ROA (1), PE (1), and PB (1) are very unfavorable, reflecting weak asset returns and expensive multiples.

Analysis of the company’s bankruptcy risk

Figma’s Altman Z-Score places it well within the safe zone, signaling a very low risk of bankruptcy and strong financial stability:

altman z score analysis

Is the company in good financial health?

The Piotroski diagram below demonstrates Figma’s financial strength based on nine fundamental criteria:

piotroski f score analysis

With a Piotroski score of 3, Figma ranks in the very weak category, indicating limited financial robustness despite favorable leverage and cash flow metrics. This suggests caution regarding its operational efficiency and profitability.

Competitive Landscape & Sector Positioning

This section analyzes Figma, Inc.’s position within the software application sector, focusing on strategic and product aspects. I will assess whether Figma holds a competitive advantage over its main industry rivals.

Strategic Positioning

Figma, Inc. concentrates its revenue primarily in the United States (492M) while maintaining significant international exposure (564M). The company offers a diversified portfolio of collaborative design and prototyping tools within the software application sector, targeting design and development teams globally.

Key Products & Brands

The following table lists Figma, Inc.’s key products and brands with their core functionalities:

ProductDescription
Figma DesignCollaborative design tool enabling teams to explore ideas, gather feedback, build prototypes, and use design systems.
Dev ModeTool to inspect designs and translate them into code without altering the original design file.
FigJamPlatform to define ideas, align decisions, and advance work collaboratively in one place.
Figma SlidesPresentation tool tailored for designers and their teams.
Figma DrawIllustration tools for creating expressive designs.
Figma BuzzPublishes brand templates for social media assets, ads, and one-pagers.
Figma SitesEnables design, prototyping, and publishing of websites.
Figma MakeAI-powered tool for designing and generating functional prototypes via prompts.

Figma, Inc.’s product suite centers on collaborative design and development, integrating prototyping, code translation, and AI assistance to streamline user interface creation.

Main Competitors

Figma, Inc. faces competition from 33 companies in its sector, with the top 10 leaders by market capitalization listed below:

CompetitorMarket Cap.
Salesforce, Inc.242B
Shopify Inc.210B
AppLovin Corporation209B
Intuit Inc.175B
Uber Technologies, Inc.172B
ServiceNow, Inc.153B
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.84B
Snowflake Inc.73B
Autodesk, Inc.61B
Workday, Inc.55B

Figma ranks 19th among 33 competitors, with a market cap just 4.86% the size of Salesforce, the sector leader. It sits below both the average market cap of the top 10 (143.6B) and the median sector cap (18.8B). The company enjoys a significant 57% market cap gap above its nearest competitor, indicating a distinct positioning below the top tier.

Does Figma have a competitive advantage?

Figma currently lacks a competitive advantage, as its ROIC significantly underperforms its WACC, indicating value destruction and declining profitability. This weak capital efficiency contrasts with typical software sector benchmarks.

Looking ahead, Figma’s diverse product suite—including AI-driven design tools and collaborative platforms—positions it to capture new markets and opportunities. These innovations could improve its competitive stance if profitability trends reverse.

Comparisons with competitors

Check out how we compare the company to its competitors:

SWOT Analysis

This SWOT analysis highlights Figma, Inc.’s current strategic position and guides investors on potential risks and rewards.

Strengths

  • Strong 82% gross margin
  • Rapid revenue growth of 41% in 2025
  • Solid liquidity with 2.58 current ratio

Weaknesses

  • Negative net margin at -118%
  • Declining ROIC signaling value destruction
  • Very weak Piotroski score of 3

Opportunities

  • Expanding collaborative design market
  • Increasing adoption of AI-powered tools
  • Growing international revenue outside US

Threats

  • High valuation metrics (PB 8.34)
  • Intense competition in software design
  • Macroeconomic volatility impacting tech spend

Figma’s strengths in growth and margins are offset by significant profitability and efficiency challenges. The firm must leverage its innovation pipeline and global reach to stabilize returns and fend off fierce competition.

Stock Price Action Analysis

The weekly stock chart for Figma, Inc. (FIG) highlights significant price fluctuations and a notable downtrend over the past year:

stock price

Trend Analysis

Over the past 12 months, FIG’s stock price declined by 80.17%, indicating a clear bearish trend. The price fell from a high of 122.0 to a low of 21.99, with accelerating downward momentum and a high volatility level (21.09 std deviation). Recent months show a continued decline of 36.29%, but with less volatility (6.54 std deviation).

Volume Analysis

Trading volume over the last three months decreased, with sellers dominating 66.39% of the activity. Buyer volume accounted for only 33.61%, underscoring a seller-driven market. This declining volume combined with persistent selling pressure suggests weakening investor interest and cautious market participation.

Target Prices

Analysts set a clear target price consensus for Figma, Inc., reflecting moderate upside potential.

Target LowTarget HighConsensus
355242.17

The target range suggests analysts expect Figma’s share price to appreciate, with a consensus near 42, signaling cautious optimism.

Analyst & Consumer Opinions

This section examines analyst ratings and consumer feedback to provide a balanced view of Figma, Inc.’s market perception.

Prorealtime Indicators

Don’t Let Luck Decide Your Entry Point

Optimize your entry points with our advanced ProRealTime indicators. You’ll get efficient buy signals with precise price targets for maximum performance. Start outperforming now!

Stock Grades

Here are the latest verified stock grades for Figma, Inc. from leading financial institutions:

Grading CompanyActionNew GradeDate
Piper SandlerMaintainOverweight2026-02-03
Morgan StanleyMaintainEqual Weight2026-01-15
Wells FargoUpgradeOverweight2026-01-08
RBC CapitalMaintainSector Perform2026-01-05
Goldman SachsMaintainNeutral2025-11-07
Piper SandlerMaintainOverweight2025-11-06
JP MorganMaintainNeutral2025-11-06
Wells FargoMaintainEqual Weight2025-11-05
Wells FargoMaintainEqual Weight2025-09-04
Morgan StanleyMaintainEqual Weight2025-09-04

The consensus remains cautious with no strong buys or sells. Most firms favor a hold or equal weight stance, while a few maintain overweight ratings, signaling moderate confidence in the stock’s near-term prospects.

Consumer Opinions

Figma, Inc. sparks strong reactions from its user base, reflecting its role as a key player in design collaboration.

Positive ReviewsNegative Reviews
Intuitive interface accelerates workflow.Occasional lag during complex file handling.
Real-time collaboration improves team synergy.Limited offline functionality frustrates users.
Robust plugin ecosystem enhances customization.Pricing tiers feel steep for small teams.

Overall, users praise Figma’s seamless collaboration and user-friendly design. However, performance issues and pricing concerns recur as notable drawbacks. This mix suggests solid appeal but room for refinement.

Risk Analysis

The table below outlines key risks for Figma, Inc., highlighting their likelihood and potential impact:

CategoryDescriptionProbabilityImpact
Profitability RiskNegative net margin (-118.44%) signals sustained losses and cash burn.HighHigh
Operational RiskExtremely low ROE (-82.78%) and ROIC (-81.95%) indicate poor capital efficiency.HighHigh
Market VolatilityBeta of -3.58 suggests unusual sensitivity and potential price swings.MediumMedium
Liquidity RiskFavorable current ratio (2.58) reduces short-term solvency concerns.LowLow
Debt RiskVery low debt-to-equity ratio (0.04) implies minimal leverage risk.LowLow
Valuation RiskHigh price-to-book ratio (8.34) may indicate overvaluation.MediumMedium
Dividend RiskNo dividends paid, limiting income appeal for yield investors.HighLow
Financial HealthPiotroski score of 3 signals weak fundamentals despite Altman Z safe zone.HighMedium

Profitability and operational risks dominate due to Figma’s steep losses and poor returns on invested capital. Despite a strong Altman Z-score indicating low bankruptcy risk, the very weak Piotroski score warns of ongoing financial struggles. The negative beta indicates unusual stock behavior, increasing market risk. Investors must weigh these red flags against the company’s innovative product suite and growth potential.

Should You Buy Figma, Inc.?

Figma, Inc. appears to be in a challenging position with declining operational efficiency and a very unfavorable moat indicating value destruction. Despite manageable leverage and a strong Altman Z-score suggesting solvency, its profitability profile and overall rating of C+ reflect significant financial weakness.

Strength & Efficiency Pillars

Figma, Inc. maintains a strong gross margin of 82.43%, reflecting robust operational efficiency. The company benefits from a favorable weighted average cost of capital (WACC) at 4.59%, supporting its financing structure. Liquidity measures are solid, with a current ratio of 2.58 and a debt-to-equity of 0.04, signaling prudent leverage management. However, profitability metrics such as net margin (-118.44%), ROE (-82.78%), and ROIC (-81.95%) remain deeply negative, indicating operational challenges despite stable cost controls.

Weaknesses and Drawbacks

Despite a safe Altman Z-Score of 6.89 indicating low bankruptcy risk, Figma faces critical profitability and valuation concerns. The net margin and ROIC are deeply negative, signaling value destruction and deteriorating profitability. The price-to-book ratio at 8.34 shows an expensive valuation relative to book value, raising investor caution. Market pressure is evident as sellers dominate recent trading (66.39%), intensifying short-term headwinds. Interest coverage at zero flags potential vulnerability to financial costs if conditions worsen.

Our Final Verdict about Figma, Inc.

Figma’s financial health appears stable from a solvency perspective, supported by a safe Altman Z-Score of 6.89. Yet, the company’s persistent losses and negative returns on capital suggest it is shedding value. Despite long-term operational strengths, recent bearish momentum and high valuation metrics suggest a wait-and-see approach. This profile might appear too risky for conservative capital but could offer speculative opportunities for investors with high risk tolerance.

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or other professional advice. Investing in financial markets involves a significant risk of loss, and past performance is not indicative of future results.

Additional Resources

For more information about Figma, Inc., please visit the official website: figma.com