In today’s fast-evolving tech landscape, Rubrik, Inc. and Teradata Corporation stand out as key players in software infrastructure, each shaping data management and analytics differently. Rubrik focuses on innovative data security and cloud protection, while Teradata excels in multi-cloud data platforms and enterprise analytics. Their overlapping markets and distinct strategies make this comparison essential. Let’s explore which company offers the best potential for your investment portfolio.
Table of contents
Companies Overview
I will begin the comparison between Rubrik, Inc. and Teradata Corporation by providing an overview of these two companies and their main differences.
Rubrik, Inc. Overview
Rubrik, Inc. provides data security solutions globally, focusing on enterprise, unstructured, cloud, and SaaS data protection. It also offers data threat analytics, security posture, and cyber recovery services. Incorporated in 2013 and based in Palo Alto, California, Rubrik serves sectors including financial, retail, healthcare, education, technology, and public sectors with a workforce of 3,200 employees.
Teradata Corporation Overview
Teradata Corporation offers a connected multi-cloud data platform designed for enterprise analytics, including the Teradata Vantage platform. Founded in 1979 and headquartered in San Diego, California, it supports clients across financial services, government, healthcare, manufacturing, retail, and telecommunications. Teradata employs about 5,700 people and provides business consulting, support, and maintenance services worldwide.
Key similarities and differences
Both Rubrik and Teradata operate in the software infrastructure industry with a focus on data management and protection. Rubrik emphasizes data security and cyber recovery, while Teradata concentrates on multi-cloud analytics platforms and business consulting. Rubrik is a younger company with a smaller workforce and market cap of 13.4B USD, compared to Teradata’s 2.8B USD market cap and longer market presence.
Income Statement Comparison
The table below presents a side-by-side comparison of key income statement metrics for Rubrik, Inc. and Teradata Corporation for their most recent fiscal years.
| Metric | Rubrik, Inc. (RBRK) | Teradata Corporation (TDC) |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | 13.4B | 2.8B |
| Revenue | 887M | 1.75B |
| EBITDA | -1.08B | 293M |
| EBIT | -1.11B | 193M |
| Net Income | -1.15B | 114M |
| EPS | -7.48 | 1.18 |
| Fiscal Year | 2025 | 2024 |
Income Statement Interpretations
Rubrik, Inc.
Rubrik experienced strong revenue growth from 2021 to 2025, with a 128.64% increase, reaching $887M in 2025. However, net income declined sharply, showing a negative trend with a net loss of $1.15B in 2025. Gross margins remained favorable at 70%, but EBIT and net margins were deeply negative, reflecting high operating expenses and widening losses in the latest year.
Teradata Corporation
Teradata’s revenue slightly declined over the 2020-2024 period, down 4.68% to $1.75B in 2024, while net income fell 11.63% to $114M. Margins improved, with a stable gross margin of 60.5% and positive EBIT and net margins at 11% and 6.5%, respectively. The recent year showed margin expansion and earnings growth, though revenue growth was negative.
Which one has the stronger fundamentals?
Teradata displays stronger fundamentals with positive EBIT and net margins, consistent profitability, and margin improvements despite mild revenue contraction. Rubrik’s robust revenue growth is offset by substantial net losses and unfavorable EBIT margins, signaling higher risk. Teradata’s favorable income statement evaluation contrasts with Rubrik’s predominantly unfavorable metrics.
Financial Ratios Comparison
The table below presents a side-by-side comparison of key financial ratios for Rubrik, Inc. and Teradata Corporation, based on their most recent fiscal year data.
| Ratios | Rubrik, Inc. (2025) | Teradata Corporation (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 2.09% | 85.71% |
| ROIC | -2.35% | 16.89% |
| P/E | -9.79 | 26.34 |
| P/B | -20.42 | 22.58 |
| Current Ratio | 1.13 | 0.81 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.13 | 0.79 |
| D/E | -0.63 | 4.33 |
| Debt-to-Assets | 24.65% | 33.80% |
| Interest Coverage | -27.49 | 7.21 |
| Asset Turnover | 0.62 | 1.03 |
| Fixed Asset Turnover | 16.67 | 9.07 |
| Payout Ratio | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend Yield | 0 | 0 |
Interpretation of the Ratios
Rubrik, Inc.
Rubrik shows a mixed financial profile with 57.14% favorable ratios including strong ROE at 208.55% and a low debt-to-equity ratio of -0.63, but faces concerns such as a negative net margin of -130.26% and poor interest coverage at -26.84. The current ratio is neutral at 1.13, indicating moderate liquidity. Rubrik does not pay dividends, likely due to ongoing reinvestment in growth and R&D, prioritizing expansion over shareholder payouts.
Teradata Corporation
Teradata exhibits a balanced ratio set with 42.86% favorable and 42.86% unfavorable ratios. It has solid ROE of 85.71% and positive net margin of 6.51%, but weaker liquidity indicated by a current ratio of 0.81 and high debt-to-equity of 4.33. Interest coverage is strong at 6.66, supporting debt servicing ability. Teradata also does not pay dividends, reflecting either reinvestment strategies or focus on operational needs over shareholder returns.
Which one has the best ratios?
Rubrik’s ratios lean more favorably overall, with higher return metrics and better leverage ratios, despite profitability and coverage challenges. Teradata’s ratio profile is more mixed, with weaker liquidity and leverage concerns balancing its positive returns. Both companies currently do not distribute dividends, emphasizing growth or operational reinvestment over immediate shareholder income.
Strategic Positioning
This section compares the strategic positioning of Rubrik, Inc. and Teradata Corporation, including market position, key segments, and exposure to technological disruption:
Rubrik, Inc.
- Mid-sized market cap of 13.4B, lower beta, niche software infrastructure sector with competitive pressure
- Focused on data security solutions across diverse sectors; main revenue from subscription and circulation (828M)
- Exposure to evolving cybersecurity threats; innovation needed to maintain position in data protection
Teradata Corporation
- Smaller market cap of 2.8B, moderate beta, established software infrastructure with global presence and competitive pressure
- Multi-cloud data platform with diversified revenue streams including consulting (248M) and recurring services (2.8B)
- Positioned in multi-cloud analytics with support services; must adapt to cloud migration and data integration disruptions
Rubrik, Inc. vs Teradata Corporation Positioning
Rubrik pursues a concentrated strategy focused on enterprise data security, relying heavily on subscription revenue, which may limit diversification. Teradata adopts a diversified approach with multi-cloud platforms, consulting, and recurring revenues, enhancing resilience but requiring broad technological adaptation.
Which has the best competitive advantage?
Teradata demonstrates a strong economic moat with growing ROIC and value creation, indicating durable competitive advantage. Rubrik shows very unfavorable MOAT metrics with declining ROIC, suggesting value destruction and weaker competitive positioning.
Stock Comparison
The stock price chart illustrates significant bullish momentum for Rubrik, Inc. (RBRK) over the past 12 months, contrasted by a bearish trend for Teradata Corporation (TDC), highlighting divergent trading dynamics and market sentiment.
Trend Analysis
Rubrik, Inc. (RBRK) exhibited a strong bullish trend over the past year with a 76.58% price increase, albeit with decelerating momentum and high volatility (std deviation 21.4). The stock peaked at 97.91 and troughed at 28.65.
Teradata Corporation (TDC) showed a bearish trend over the same period, with a 21.26% price decline but recent acceleration marked by a 42.78% gain since November 2025, accompanied by lower volatility (std deviation 5.63).
Comparing both, Rubrik delivered the highest market performance with a sizable overall price gain, while Teradata experienced a significant decline despite recent positive reversal signs.
Target Prices
Analysts present a positive target consensus for both Rubrik, Inc. and Teradata Corporation, reflecting potential upside from current prices.
| Company | Target High | Target Low | Consensus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rubrik, Inc. | 113 | 105 | 109.33 |
| Teradata Corporation | 35 | 27 | 31 |
The target consensus for Rubrik, Inc. at 109.33 significantly exceeds its current price of 67.1 USD, indicating strong growth expectations. Teradata’s consensus target of 31 USD also suggests modest upside compared to its current price of 29.77 USD.
Analyst Opinions Comparison
This section compares analysts’ ratings and grades for Rubrik, Inc. and Teradata Corporation:
Rating Comparison
Rubrik, Inc. Rating
- Rating: C, considered Very Favorable overall
- Discounted Cash Flow Score: 1, Very Unfavorable
- ROE Score: 5, Very Favorable
- ROA Score: 1, Very Unfavorable
- Debt To Equity Score: 1, Very Unfavorable
- Overall Score: 2, Moderate
Teradata Corporation Rating
- Rating: B+, considered Very Favorable overall
- Discounted Cash Flow Score: 4, Favorable
- ROE Score: 5, Very Favorable
- ROA Score: 4, Favorable
- Debt To Equity Score: 1, Very Unfavorable
- Overall Score: 3, Moderate
Which one is the best rated?
Teradata holds a higher rating (B+) and better scores in discounted cash flow and return on assets compared to Rubrik’s C rating and lower scores. Both share a very unfavorable debt to equity score, but Teradata’s overall financial assessment is moderately stronger.
Scores Comparison
Here is a comparison of the Altman Z-Score and Piotroski Score for Rubrik, Inc. and Teradata Corporation:
Rubrik, Inc. Scores
- Altman Z-Score: 1.41, in the distress zone indicating financial distress risk.
- Piotroski Score: 4, indicating average financial strength.
Teradata Corporation Scores
- Altman Z-Score: 0.81, in the distress zone indicating higher bankruptcy risk.
- Piotroski Score: 8, indicating very strong financial health.
Which company has the best scores?
Teradata has a lower Altman Z-Score, indicating a higher bankruptcy risk, but a much stronger Piotroski Score than Rubrik. Overall, Teradata shows a stronger financial health by the Piotroski metric despite distress zone risk.
Grades Comparison
The following tables present the recent grades assigned by reputable grading companies for Rubrik, Inc. and Teradata Corporation:
Rubrik, Inc. Grades
This table shows the latest grades and rating actions from key financial institutions.
| Grading Company | Action | New Grade | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keybanc | Maintain | Overweight | 2026-01-12 |
| Piper Sandler | Maintain | Overweight | 2026-01-05 |
| Citigroup | Maintain | Buy | 2025-12-08 |
| Piper Sandler | Maintain | Overweight | 2025-12-05 |
| Baird | Maintain | Outperform | 2025-12-05 |
| William Blair | Upgrade | Outperform | 2025-12-05 |
| Keybanc | Maintain | Overweight | 2025-12-05 |
| Wedbush | Maintain | Outperform | 2025-12-05 |
| BMO Capital | Maintain | Outperform | 2025-12-05 |
| Rosenblatt | Maintain | Buy | 2025-12-05 |
Rubrik’s grades consistently reflect positive momentum, with multiple institutions maintaining or upgrading to Outperform and Overweight ratings.
Teradata Corporation Grades
This table details Teradata’s latest grades and rating decisions from well-known financial analysts.
| Grading Company | Action | New Grade | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barclays | Maintain | Underweight | 2026-01-12 |
| RBC Capital | Maintain | Sector Perform | 2026-01-05 |
| Morgan Stanley | Maintain | Overweight | 2025-12-17 |
| Citizens | Upgrade | Market Outperform | 2025-11-10 |
| Barclays | Maintain | Underweight | 2025-11-05 |
| TD Cowen | Maintain | Hold | 2025-11-05 |
| Evercore ISI Group | Maintain | Outperform | 2025-11-05 |
| UBS | Maintain | Neutral | 2025-08-06 |
| Guggenheim | Maintain | Buy | 2025-05-07 |
| Barclays | Maintain | Underweight | 2025-04-21 |
Teradata’s grades show mixed signals, with several Hold and Underweight ratings persisting alongside some Outperform and Buy opinions.
Which company has the best grades?
Rubrik, Inc. has received predominantly positive grades with multiple Buy and Outperform ratings and an overall Buy consensus. Teradata Corporation’s grades are more varied, combining Hold and Underweight ratings with fewer Buy endorsements, leading to an overall Hold consensus. This contrast suggests Rubrik is viewed more favorably by analysts, potentially reflecting higher confidence in its near-term prospects.
Strengths and Weaknesses
Below is a comparative overview of key strengths and weaknesses of Rubrik, Inc. and Teradata Corporation based on recent financial and operational data.
| Criterion | Rubrik, Inc. (RBRK) | Teradata Corporation (TDC) |
|---|---|---|
| Diversification | Moderate: Revenue mainly from Subscription (828.7M) with some Maintenance (18.4M) and other services (44.6M) | High: Broad revenue streams including Consulting (248M), Recurring Products (1.48B), Services (1.19B), and Software Licenses (289M) |
| Profitability | Weak: Negative net margin (-130.26%), negative ROIC (-234.85%), value destroying | Strong: Positive net margin (6.51%), ROIC (16.89%), value creating |
| Innovation | Moderate: High ROE (208.55%) suggests efficient use of equity despite value destruction | Moderate: Solid ROE (85.71%) and growing ROIC indicate innovation supporting profitability |
| Global presence | Limited data, but smaller revenue base suggests less global reach | Extensive: Large international and domestic revenue segments, diversified services and software |
| Market Share | Smaller scale with concentrated revenue in subscriptions | Larger scale with diversified recurring and consulting services, stronger market position |
Key takeaways: Teradata offers a more diversified and stable business model with positive profitability and growing returns, reflecting a durable competitive advantage. Rubrik shows strong equity efficiency but suffers from declining profitability and value destruction, indicating higher investment risk.
Risk Analysis
Below is a comparative table highlighting key risks for Rubrik, Inc. (RBRK) and Teradata Corporation (TDC) based on the most recent financial year data and market conditions.
| Metric | Rubrik, Inc. (RBRK) | Teradata Corporation (TDC) |
|---|---|---|
| Market Risk | Low beta (0.28) indicates lower volatility but negative net margin (-130%) signals operational challenges. | Moderate beta (0.57) with stable net margin (6.5%) but higher valuation multiples increase market sensitivity. |
| Debt Level | Favorable debt-to-assets ratio (24.65%) with negative debt/equity ratio, implying conservative leverage. | Higher debt/equity ratio (4.33) and neutral debt-to-assets (33.8%) increase financial risk. |
| Regulatory Risk | Standard tech industry regulation, no recent issues reported. | Similar industry regulatory environment; global operations may add compliance complexity. |
| Operational Risk | Negative ROIC (-235%) and unfavorable interest coverage indicate operational inefficiencies. | Positive ROIC (16.9%) and interest coverage (6.66) suggest stronger operational resilience. |
| Environmental Risk | No significant exposure noted; typical for software infrastructure companies. | Similar low environmental risk profile. |
| Geopolitical Risk | US-based with global clients; moderate exposure to international market volatility. | Greater geographic diversity increases exposure to geopolitical uncertainties. |
Rubrik faces significant operational and profitability risks, especially with negative net margins and weak interest coverage, despite low market volatility. Teradata, while operationally stronger, carries higher financial leverage and moderate market risk due to valuation levels. Investors should weigh Rubrik’s growth potential against its financial distress signals and Teradata’s stable earnings but elevated debt risk.
Which Stock to Choose?
Rubrik, Inc. (RBRK) shows strong revenue growth of 41.2% in 2025, with favorable gross margin and ROE at 208.6%. However, profitability remains challenged with a negative net margin of -130.3%, declining ROIC, and a very unfavorable moat indicating value destruction. Debt levels are low, and the rating is very favorable overall despite some weak financial scores.
Teradata Corporation (TDC) presents a mixed income evolution with a slight revenue decline of -4.5% in 2024 but a positive net margin of 6.5% and improving profitability measures. ROE is favorable at 85.7%, and the company shows a very favorable moat with growing ROIC. Debt is relatively higher, and the rating is very favorable with strong efficiency scores.
Investors focused on growth may find Rubrik’s rapid revenue expansion and strong ROE attractive, though its profitability and value creation metrics suggest caution. Those prioritizing stable profitability and a durable competitive advantage might see Teradata’s improving income statement and favorable moat as more reassuring, despite recent revenue softness and higher leverage.
Disclaimer: Investment carries a risk of loss of initial capital. The past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Be sure to understand risks before making an investment decision.
Go Further
I encourage you to read the complete analyses of Rubrik, Inc. and Teradata Corporation to enhance your investment decisions:
