In today’s evolving technology landscape, Ouster, Inc. and Mesa Laboratories, Inc. stand out as key players within the hardware and equipment sector. Ouster specializes in advanced lidar sensors for 3D vision applications, while Mesa Laboratories focuses on life sciences tools and quality control products. Both companies showcase strong innovation strategies, making their comparison essential for investors seeking promising tech opportunities. Join me as we explore which company offers the most compelling investment potential.

Ouster vs Mesa Laboratories: Company Comparison
Table of contents

Companies Overview

I will begin the comparison between Ouster, Inc. and Mesa Laboratories, Inc. by providing an overview of these two companies and their main differences.

Ouster, Inc. Overview

Ouster, Inc. designs and manufactures high-resolution digital lidar sensors and enabling software to provide 3D vision capabilities for machinery, vehicles, robots, and fixed infrastructure assets. Positioned in the technology sector under hardware and equipment, Ouster is a relatively young company based in San Francisco, with a market cap of 1.63B USD and 292 employees, focused on innovative sensing solutions.

Mesa Laboratories, Inc. Overview

Mesa Laboratories, Inc. develops and sells life sciences tools and quality control products across multiple segments, including sterilization control, biopharmaceutical development, calibration solutions, and clinical genomics. Founded in 1982 and headquartered in Lakewood, Colorado, Mesa operates globally with 736 employees and a market cap of 472M USD, serving healthcare and laboratory markets with specialized testing and analytical instruments.

Key similarities and differences

Both companies operate within the technology sector in hardware and equipment, but Ouster focuses on digital lidar sensors for vision applications, while Mesa Laboratories provides life sciences and quality control products. Ouster is smaller and newer with a higher beta, indicating more volatility, whereas Mesa has a more diversified product portfolio, established markets, and a stable dividend, reflecting a more mature business model.

Income Statement Comparison

The table below presents a side-by-side comparison of the most recent fiscal year income statement metrics for Ouster, Inc. and Mesa Laboratories, Inc., providing an overview of their financial performance.

income comparison
MetricOuster, Inc. (2024)Mesa Laboratories, Inc. (2025)
Market Cap1.63B472M
Revenue111.1M241.0M
EBITDA-79.9M42.3M
EBIT-94.7M17.8M
Net Income-97.0M-2.0M
EPS-2.08-0.36
Fiscal Year20242025

Income Statement Interpretations

Ouster, Inc.

Ouster, Inc. has shown strong revenue growth from 2020 to 2024, increasing from $19M to $111M, with net income losses narrowing significantly over the period. Gross margins improved to 36.4% in 2024, reflecting better cost management, while net margin remains negative at -87.4%. The latest year saw a 33.4% revenue increase and an 80.6% net margin improvement, signaling positive momentum.

Mesa Laboratories, Inc.

Mesa Laboratories experienced steady revenue growth, reaching $241M in fiscal 2025 from $134M in 2021. Gross margin remains robust at 62.6%, while EBIT margin is modest at 7.4%. Despite a slight net loss in 2025 with a -0.82% net margin, the company improved net margin and EPS growth by around 99% year-over-year, indicating operational progress despite persistent net income challenges.

Which one has the stronger fundamentals?

Ouster exhibits rapid revenue expansion and significant improvements in profitability metrics, albeit with continued net losses. Mesa Laboratories maintains higher gross margins and positive EBIT margin but shows less consistent net income growth, with a prolonged net loss trend. Both companies have favorable income statement evaluations, with Ouster showing a higher proportion of positive metrics overall.

Financial Ratios Comparison

This table compares key financial ratios for Ouster, Inc. (OUST) and Mesa Laboratories, Inc. (MLAB) based on their most recent fiscal year data available.

RatiosOuster, Inc. (2024)Mesa Laboratories, Inc. (2025)
ROE-53.6%-1.24%
ROIC-50.8%-1.45%
P/E-5.87-326.35
P/B3.154.03
Current Ratio2.800.63
Quick Ratio2.590.47
D/E (Debt-to-Equity)0.111.14
Debt-to-Assets7.33%41.9%
Interest Coverage-57.151.38
Asset Turnover0.400.56
Fixed Asset Turnover4.547.45
Payout Ratio0-176.68%
Dividend Yield00.54%

Interpretation of the Ratios

Ouster, Inc.

Ouster shows a mixed ratio profile with 42.86% favorable and 57.14% unfavorable ratios, indicating financial challenges. Key concerns include a negative net margin (-87.35%), low return on equity (-53.64%), and weak interest coverage (-51.94). The current ratio (2.8) and low debt-to-equity (0.11) are strengths. Ouster pays no dividends, likely due to ongoing losses and reinvestment priorities.

Mesa Laboratories, Inc.

Mesa Laboratories displays weaker financial health, with only 21.43% favorable ratios and 64.29% unfavorable, plus some neutral. It suffers a small negative net margin (-0.82%) and low returns on equity (-1.24%) and invested capital (-1.45%). The company carries high debt levels (debt-to-equity 1.14) and poor liquidity (current ratio 0.63). It pays dividends, but yield is low (0.54%) with risks from limited coverage.

Which one has the best ratios?

Comparing both, Ouster has a relatively stronger liquidity position and lower leverage, while Mesa struggles with high debt and weaker liquidity. Both companies have predominantly unfavorable profitability ratios, but Ouster’s higher proportion of favorable metrics and better coverage of liabilities suggest slightly better overall ratio health.

Strategic Positioning

This section compares the strategic positioning of Ouster, Inc. and Mesa Laboratories, Inc., including their market position, key segments, and exposure to technological disruption:

Ouster, Inc.

  • Market position and competitive pressure: Smaller market cap at 1.63B, higher beta implies greater volatility and competitive pressure.
  • Key segments and business drivers: Focused on high-resolution digital lidar sensors and software for 3D vision applications.
  • Exposure to technological disruption: Operates in advanced lidar sensor technology, a rapidly evolving field with innovation demands.

Mesa Laboratories, Inc.

  • Market cap of 471M, lower beta indicates less volatility and potentially more stable competitive environment.
  • Diversified segments including sterilization control, biopharmaceutical development, calibration solutions, and clinical genomics.
  • Operates in life sciences tools and quality control products with steady innovation but less exposure to rapid technological upheaval.

Ouster, Inc. vs Mesa Laboratories, Inc. Positioning

Ouster is concentrated in a niche lidar sensor market with growth potential but higher volatility, while Mesa operates a diversified portfolio across life sciences, offering broad revenue streams but facing slower innovation cycles.

Which has the best competitive advantage?

Both companies are currently shedding value; Ouster shows improving profitability trends, while Mesa experiences declining returns, indicating Ouster might sustain a slightly stronger competitive advantage despite value destruction.

Stock Comparison

The past year reveals contrasting price dynamics with Ouster, Inc. showing strong overall gains tempered by recent declines, while Mesa Laboratories, Inc. exhibits a prolonged downtrend with a short-term rebound.

stock price comparison

Trend Analysis

Ouster, Inc. recorded a 407.66% price increase over the past 12 months, indicating a bullish trend with decelerating momentum. The stock fluctuated between a low of 4.82 and a high of 35.8, with recent weeks showing an 18.28% decline.

Mesa Laboratories, Inc. experienced an 18.93% drop over the same period, reflecting a bearish trend with accelerating downward pressure. Prices ranged from 61.66 to 147.79, but recent activity showed an 18.11% recovery.

Comparing both, Ouster, Inc. delivered substantially higher market performance over the year despite recent weakness, while Mesa Laboratories, Inc. showed overall losses mitigated by a short-term upward correction.

Target Prices

The target price consensus for Ouster, Inc. and Mesa Laboratories, Inc. suggests notable upside potential for both stocks.

CompanyTarget HighTarget LowConsensus
Ouster, Inc.393336.67
Mesa Laboratories, Inc.838383

Analyst expectations indicate Ouster’s stock could rise from $27.23 to a consensus near $36.67, while Mesa Laboratories trades slightly above its $83 consensus target at $85.43, signaling market confidence in both.

Analyst Opinions Comparison

This section compares analysts’ ratings and grades for Ouster, Inc. and Mesa Laboratories, Inc.:

Rating Comparison

OUST Rating

  • Rating: C-, considered very favorable overall.
  • Discounted Cash Flow Score: 1, rated very unfavorable for valuation metrics.
  • ROE Score: 1, very unfavorable, showing low profit generation from equity.
  • ROA Score: 1, very unfavorable, reflecting weak asset utilization.
  • Debt To Equity Score: 3, moderate risk with balanced debt levels.
  • Overall Score: 1, very unfavorable, indicating weak overall financial health.

MLAB Rating

  • Rating: C+, considered very favorable overall.
  • Discounted Cash Flow Score: 5, rated very favorable, indicating undervaluation.
  • ROE Score: 1, very unfavorable, similar low efficiency in generating profits.
  • ROA Score: 1, very unfavorable, also weak in asset utilization.
  • Debt To Equity Score: 1, very unfavorable, indicating higher financial risk.
  • Overall Score: 2, moderate, showing better overall financial standing.

Which one is the best rated?

Based strictly on the provided data, MLAB holds a higher rating (C+) and better overall score (2) compared to OUST’s rating (C-) and overall score (1), mainly due to its very favorable discounted cash flow score despite some unfavorable profitability and debt metrics.

Scores Comparison

Here is a comparison of the Altman Z-Score and Piotroski Score for both companies:

Ouster, Inc. Scores

  • Altman Z-Score: 3.66, indicating a safe zone
  • Piotroski Score: 4, classified as average

Mesa Laboratories, Inc. Scores

  • Altman Z-Score: 1.36, indicating a distress zone
  • Piotroski Score: 5, classified as average

Which company has the best scores?

Ouster, Inc. shows a significantly stronger Altman Z-Score, placing it in the safe zone, while Mesa Laboratories is in distress. Mesa has a slightly higher Piotroski Score, but both remain in the average category.

Grades Comparison

The following section compares the recent grades assigned to Ouster, Inc. and Mesa Laboratories, Inc. by reputable grading firms:

Ouster, Inc. Grades

This table summarizes the latest grading actions from recognized financial institutions for Ouster, Inc.:

Grading CompanyActionNew GradeDate
Cantor FitzgeraldUpgradeOverweight2025-11-07
Cantor FitzgeraldUpgradeOverweight2025-11-06
WestPark CapitalMaintainBuy2025-11-05
RosenblattMaintainBuy2025-11-05
WestPark CapitalUpgradeBuy2025-08-13
OppenheimerMaintainOutperform2025-07-16
WestPark CapitalDowngradeHold2025-06-12
WestPark CapitalUpgradeBuy2025-05-09
RosenblattMaintainBuy2025-03-21
Cantor FitzgeraldMaintainOverweight2025-03-21

Overall, Ouster shows a predominantly positive trend with multiple upgrades and sustained buy or outperform ratings.

Mesa Laboratories, Inc. Grades

Below is the detailed grading data from established analysts for Mesa Laboratories, Inc.:

Grading CompanyActionNew GradeDate
Wells FargoMaintainEqual Weight2025-12-15
Wells FargoUpgradeEqual Weight2025-08-08
Wells FargoMaintainUnderweight2025-05-30
Evercore ISI GroupMaintainOutperform2024-10-01
Evercore ISI GroupMaintainOutperform2024-08-06
Evercore ISI GroupMaintainOutperform2024-07-02
Evercore ISI GroupMaintainOutperform2024-04-04
Evercore ISI GroupUpgradeOutperform2024-01-04
Evercore ISI GroupDowngradeIn Line2021-01-04
Evercore ISI GroupDowngradeIn Line2021-01-03

Mesa Laboratories exhibits a mix of equal weight and outperform grades, with a recent shift toward equal weight from Wells Fargo, reflecting a more cautious stance.

Which company has the best grades?

Ouster, Inc. holds a stronger consensus with consistent buy and outperform grades, while Mesa Laboratories, Inc. leans towards hold and equal weight ratings. This difference may influence investors seeking more aggressive growth versus more conservative positions.

Strengths and Weaknesses

The table below compares the key strengths and weaknesses of Ouster, Inc. (OUST) and Mesa Laboratories, Inc. (MLAB) based on recent financial performance and strategic positioning.

CriterionOuster, Inc. (OUST)Mesa Laboratories, Inc. (MLAB)
DiversificationLimited product focus, mostly in lidar technologyMore diversified product portfolio across multiple segments including biopharmaceutical, calibration, and clinical genomics
ProfitabilityNegative profitability with net margin at -87.35% and declining ROIC but improving trendNegative profitability with slight margin loss (-0.82%) and declining ROIC trend
InnovationStrong ROIC growth trend (+65%), suggesting improving operational efficiencyDeclining ROIC (-166%) indicating challenges in maintaining innovation-driven returns
Global presenceModerate with recent revenue of $111M mostly product-basedLarger global footprint with $241M revenue combining products and services
Market ShareEmerging player with smaller revenue and market footprintEstablished player with steady revenue growth and wider market penetration

In summary, Ouster shows promising operational improvements but faces profitability challenges and limited diversification. Mesa Laboratories has a broader product range and larger revenue base but struggles with profitability and declining returns on capital, signaling caution for investors.

Risk Analysis

Below is a risk comparison table for Ouster, Inc. (OUST) and Mesa Laboratories, Inc. (MLAB) based on the most recent financial and market data from 2025-2026.

MetricOuster, Inc. (OUST)Mesa Laboratories, Inc. (MLAB)
Market RiskHigh beta of 2.935, volatile price range (6.34-41.65)Moderate beta 0.889, stable price range (55.45-155.12)
Debt LevelLow debt-to-equity ratio 0.11, favorable leverageHigh debt-to-equity ratio 1.14, higher financial risk
Regulatory RiskModerate, tech hardware sector subject to evolving standardsModerate, life sciences tools regulated in healthcare and pharma
Operational RiskNegative net margin (-87.35%) and ROE (-53.64%), indicating operational inefficiencySlightly negative net margin (-0.82%) and ROE (-1.24%), moderate operational risk
Environmental RiskLimited direct exposure, but manufacturing impact possibleModerate due to chemical and biological indicators production
Geopolitical RiskUS-based with global exposure, some supply chain risksUS-based with international sales, exposed to trade policies

In synthesis, Ouster faces the most impactful risks from market volatility and operational inefficiencies, notably its high beta and large negative profitability metrics. Mesa Laboratories carries significant debt risk and moderate operational concerns but benefits from a more stable market profile. Both companies require close monitoring of financial health and sector-specific regulations to manage investment risk prudently.

Which Stock to Choose?

Ouster, Inc. (OUST) shows a favorable income evolution with strong revenue growth of 33.41% in the last year and an overall 488% increase since 2020. Despite unfavorable profitability ratios such as a -87.35% net margin and -53.64% ROE, its debt levels remain low with a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.11, and a solid current ratio of 2.8. The company’s rating is very favorable at C-, though financial ratios are generally unfavorable.

Mesa Laboratories, Inc. (MLAB) displays a favorable income trend with an 11.47% revenue growth last year and a 64% favorable overall income statement evaluation. Profitability ratios remain weak with a -0.82% net margin and -1.24% ROE, while its debt levels are higher, showing a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.14 and a current ratio below 1 at 0.63. The company holds a very favorable rating of C+, but the majority of its financial ratios are unfavorable.

For investors prioritizing growth and improving income statements, Ouster’s strong revenue and profit growth alongside low debt might appear more attractive. Conversely, those valuing established ratings and long-term stability could find Mesa Laboratories’ consistent income evaluation relevant, despite higher leverage and weaker profitability. The choice could therefore depend on an investor’s risk tolerance and strategic focus.

Disclaimer: Investment carries a risk of loss of initial capital. The past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Be sure to understand risks before making an investment decision.

Go Further

I encourage you to read the complete analyses of Ouster, Inc. and Mesa Laboratories, Inc. to enhance your investment decisions: