In today’s rapidly evolving industrial landscape, the competition between established players is more intense than ever. This article pits Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO), a stalwart in manufacturing welding solutions, against IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP), a leader in high-performance laser technology. Both companies operate in sectors where innovation drives growth and profitability, making them intriguing subjects for comparison. Join me as we explore which of these two companies presents the most compelling opportunity for savvy investors.

IPGP_LECO Featured Image
Table of contents

Company Overview

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. Overview

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) specializes in designing, manufacturing, and selling welding, cutting, and brazing products globally. Founded in 1895 and headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, the company operates through three segments: Americas Welding, International Welding, and The Harris Products Group. With a market capitalization of approximately $13.2B, Lincoln Electric’s diverse product portfolio includes arc welding power sources, robotic welding packages, and specialty welding consumables. The company caters to various industries, including automotive, construction, and energy, offering both direct sales and distribution channels.

IPG Photonics Corporation Overview

IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) is a leader in developing and manufacturing high-performance fiber lasers and amplifiers, serving a wide array of applications, particularly in materials processing. Established in 1990 and based in Oxford, Massachusetts, the company has a market capitalization of about $3.35B. IPG’s innovative laser solutions are utilized in telecommunications, medical applications, and advanced manufacturing processes. The company markets its products through a direct sales force and independent distributors, showcasing its commitment to providing cutting-edge technology to its customers.

Key similarities and differences

Both Lincoln Electric and IPG Photonics operate within the manufacturing sector, focusing on specialized products for industrial applications. However, while Lincoln Electric emphasizes welding technology, IPG Photonics specializes in laser systems. Their distribution approaches are also distinct, with Lincoln utilizing both direct sales and industrial distributors, whereas IPG relies more on direct sales and agreements with independent representatives.

Income Statement Comparison

The following table presents a comparative overview of the income statements for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) and IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) based on their most recent fiscal year.

MetricLincoln Electric (LECO)IPG Photonics (IPGP)
Market Cap13.17B3.35B
Revenue4.01B0.98B
EBITDA800.52M75.92M
EBIT712.28M14.48M
Net Income466.11M-181.53M
EPS8.23-4.09
Fiscal Year20242024

Interpretation of Income Statement

In the most recent fiscal year, Lincoln Electric (LECO) experienced a slight decrease in revenue compared to the previous year, while maintaining a solid net income of 466.11M. This stability reflects effective cost management as evidenced by its healthy EBITDA margin. In contrast, IPG Photonics (IPGP) faced significant challenges, reporting a notable decrease in revenue along with a negative net income of -181.53M. The decline in profitability is primarily driven by increased operating expenses and a drop in sales, indicating potential issues in demand or competitive pressures within the semiconductor sector. This stark difference highlights LECO’s stronger financial health and resilience in comparison to IPGP.

Financial Ratios Comparison

The table below presents a comparative analysis of the recent financial ratios of Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) and IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP).

MetricLECOIPGP
ROE35.11%-8.97%
ROIC18.06%-11.15%
P/E22.78-17.76
P/B8.001.59
Current Ratio1.876.98
Quick Ratio1.255.59
D/E0.990.01
Debt-to-Assets37.39%0.78%
Interest Coverage14.88N/A
Asset Turnover1.140.43
Fixed Asset Turnover6.471.66
Payout ratio34.79%0.00%
Dividend yield1.53%0.00%

Interpretation of Financial Ratios

Lincoln Electric exhibits strong financial ratios, particularly in ROE and ROIC, indicating effective capital utilization. The company’s debt levels are manageable, reflected by a moderate D/E ratio and robust interest coverage. Conversely, IPG shows negative profitability metrics, including ROE and P/E, raising concerns about operational efficiency and financial stability. The high current and quick ratios suggest good liquidity, but the lack of profitability may overshadow this advantage. Overall, caution is advised when considering IPGP for investment.

Dividend and Shareholder Returns

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) demonstrates a commitment to shareholder returns through a dividend yield of 1.53% and a payout ratio of 34.8%. This indicates a balanced approach to returning capital while maintaining sufficient cash flow for operations. In contrast, IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) does not pay dividends, opting instead to reinvest earnings into growth initiatives. Although it engages in share buyback programs, the lack of dividends may raise concerns about long-term shareholder value creation. Overall, LECO’s distribution supports sustainable value, while IPGP’s strategy may align with growth but lacks immediate returns for shareholders.

Strategic Positioning

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) commands a robust position in the welding and cutting tools market, holding a significant market share due to its diverse product offerings and established brand reputation. In contrast, IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) leads in the fiber laser technology sector, facing competitive pressure from emerging technologies and new entrants. Both companies navigate technological disruptions effectively, leveraging innovation to maintain their market standings, albeit with differing competitive landscapes.

Stock Comparison

The past year has seen notable movements in the stock prices of Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) and IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP), reflecting diverse trading dynamics and investor sentiment toward these companies.

stock price comparison

Trend Analysis

For Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO), the overall percentage change over the past year is +13.35%, indicating a bullish trend. The highest price during this period reached 258.04, while the lowest was 172.02. However, the trend shows signs of deceleration, with a recent price change of +0.13% from September 14, 2025, to November 30, 2025. This indicates that while the stock remains in a positive trajectory, the pace of growth is slowing down. The standard deviation of 22.74 suggests moderate volatility in the stock’s price.

Conversely, IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) has experienced a significant decline with a percentage change of -21.78%, signifying a bearish trend. The stock reached a high of 102.82 and a low of 52.12 over the past year. The recent trend analysis indicates a further decrease of -0.38% between September 14, 2025, and November 30, 2025, with a trend slope suggesting continued acceleration in this downward movement. The standard deviation of 10.92 reflects lower volatility compared to LECO, but the bearish sentiment remains strong.

In summary, LECO shows a resilient performance but with a decelerating growth rate, while IPGP is under significant pressure, presenting a cautious outlook for investors.

Analyst Opinions

Recent analyst recommendations for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) indicate a buy rating with a strong overall score of 3, reflecting robust return metrics and manageable debt levels. In contrast, IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) holds a rating of B-, suggesting a hold position due to moderate performance scores across key financial metrics. Analysts emphasize LECO’s solid fundamentals as a driving factor for their positive outlook, while IPGP’s mixed results warrant caution. The consensus for LECO is a buy, while IPGP’s consensus leans towards hold.

Stock Grades

I have gathered recent stock grades from reliable grading companies for two companies: Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) and IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP). Below are the details of their current ratings.

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. Grades

Grading CompanyActionNew GradeDate
StifelmaintainHold2025-10-31
BarclaysmaintainOverweight2025-10-20
KeybancmaintainOverweight2025-08-01
StifelmaintainHold2025-08-01
StifelmaintainHold2025-07-21
KeybancmaintainOverweight2025-07-15
Morgan StanleymaintainUnderweight2025-05-06
KeybancmaintainOverweight2025-05-01
BairdmaintainOutperform2025-05-01
StifelmaintainHold2025-05-01

IPG Photonics Corporation Grades

Grading CompanyActionNew GradeDate
CitigroupupgradeBuy2025-11-05
BernsteinupgradeOutperform2025-08-07
Raymond JamesmaintainStrong Buy2025-05-07
CL KingupgradeBuy2025-03-18
CitigroupmaintainSell2025-02-18
StifelmaintainBuy2025-02-12
NeedhammaintainHold2025-02-12
Seaport GlobaldowngradeNeutral2024-08-01
StifelmaintainBuy2024-07-31
Raymond JamesmaintainStrong Buy2024-07-31

Overall, the grades for Lincoln Electric indicate a stable outlook with maintain ratings across various firms. In contrast, IPG Photonics shows a positive trend, with recent upgrades highlighting an improved sentiment among analysts.

Target Prices

The consensus target prices for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) and IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) indicate positive growth expectations from analysts.

CompanyTarget HighTarget LowConsensus
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.285260272.5
IPG Photonics Corporation969294

For LECO, the current price of 239.43 suggests upside potential, while for IPGP, trading at 79.64, there is also room for growth based on analyst expectations.

Strengths and Weaknesses

The following table outlines the strengths and weaknesses of two companies, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) and IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP), based on recent data.

CriterionLincoln Electric (LECO)IPG Photonics (IPGP)
DiversificationHighModerate
ProfitabilityStrong (Net Margin: 11.63%)Weak (Net Margin: -18.58%)
InnovationModerateHigh
Global presenceStrongStrong
Market ShareSignificantGrowing
Debt levelModerate (Debt to Equity: 0.99)Very Low (Debt to Equity: 0.01)

Key takeaways indicate that Lincoln Electric demonstrates strong profitability and a significant global presence, while IPG Photonics excels in innovation despite its current financial challenges. Investors should weigh the strengths carefully against the weaknesses before making decisions.

Risk Analysis

The following table outlines the key risks associated with Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) and IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP):

MetricLincoln Electric (LECO)IPG Photonics (IPGP)
Market RiskModerateHigh
Regulatory RiskLowModerate
Operational RiskModerateHigh
Environmental RiskLowModerate
Geopolitical RiskModerateHigh

In summary, IPGP faces significant operational and market risks, especially with recent declines in net income margins, while LECO maintains a more stable profile with relatively lower risks, particularly in environmental and regulatory aspects.

Which one to choose?

When comparing Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) and IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP), LECO appears to be the more favorable option for investors. LECO has a strong gross profit margin of 36.9% and a net profit margin of 11.6%, whereas IPGP has seen a decline, with a net profit margin of -18.5% in its latest fiscal year. LECO’s stock trend is bullish with a 13.35% increase, while IPGP’s trend is bearish, decreasing by 21.78%. Analysts have rated LECO with a “B,” reflecting solid financial health, compared to IPGP’s “B-,” indicating some concerns.

Investors focused on growth may prefer LECO due to its robust margins and positive stock performance, while those willing to take on higher risk for potential recovery might consider IPGP.

However, investors should note the risk of market dependence and competition within the industry.

Disclaimer: This article is not financial advice. Each investor is responsible for their own investment decisions.

Go further

I encourage you to read the complete analyses of Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. and IPG Photonics Corporation to enhance your investment decisions: