Home > Comparison > Technology > WIT vs JKHY

The strategic rivalry between Wipro Limited and Jack Henry & Associates defines the current trajectory of the global technology services sector. Wipro, a capital-intensive, diversified IT services giant with a vast employee base, contrasts sharply with Jack Henry, a specialized, high-margin provider focused on financial technology solutions. This head-to-head reflects a broader battle between scale-driven diversification and niche market specialization. This analysis will determine which corporate model offers superior risk-adjusted returns for a diversified portfolio.

Wipro vs Jack Henry & Associates: Company Comparison
Table of contents

Companies Overview

Wipro Limited and Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. are pivotal players in the global IT services sector, shaping distinct market niches.

Wipro Limited: Global IT Services Powerhouse

Wipro Limited stands as a leader in IT, consulting, and business process services worldwide. Its revenue flows predominantly from IT Services, including cloud, analytics, and digital strategy advisory. In 2026, Wipro’s strategic focus lies in expanding its India State Run Enterprise Services alongside reinforcing its broad industry reach across healthcare, banking, and manufacturing.

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.: Specialized Financial Tech Provider

Jack Henry & Associates excels as a technology solutions provider for U.S. financial institutions. It monetizes through core data processing, payments, and complementary products for banks and credit unions. Its 2026 strategy centers on enhancing integrated applications and digital payment solutions, emphasizing scalability for community to multi-billion-dollar banks under distinct brands like Jack Henry Banking and Symitar.

Strategic Collision: Similarities & Divergences

Both firms deliver technology services but diverge sharply in scope and client focus. Wipro pursues a broad global IT services model, while Jack Henry commits to a narrow, specialized financial technology ecosystem in the U.S. Their primary battleground is digital innovation, yet Wipro competes on scale and diversity whereas Jack Henry leverages niche expertise. This shapes distinct investment profiles: Wipro offers diversified exposure, Jack Henry targets specialized financial tech growth.

Income Statement Comparison

The following data dissects the core profitability and scalability of both corporate engines to reveal who dominates the bottom line:

income comparison
MetricWipro Limited (WIT)Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY)
Revenue901.3B INR2.38B USD
Cost of Revenue625.1B INR1.36B USD
Operating Expenses122.7B INR446M USD
Gross Profit276.3B INR1.01B USD
EBITDA220.5B INR801M USD
EBIT191.7B INR596M USD
Interest Expense14.9B INR10.4M USD
Net Income132.9B INR456M USD
EPS12.56 INR6.24 USD
Fiscal Year20252025

Income Statement Analysis: The Bottom-Line Duel

This income statement comparison reveals which company converts revenue into profit with superior efficiency and momentum.

Wipro Limited Analysis

Wipro’s revenue slightly declined by 0.24% to 901B INR in FY 2025, yet net income rose 19.6% to 133B INR. Gross margin improved to a healthy 30.65%, and net margin expanded to 14.74%, reflecting better cost control. Operating income surged 19%, signaling enhanced efficiency despite flat top-line growth.

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. Analysis

Jack Henry’s revenue grew 7.2% to $2.38B in FY 2025, with net income increasing 19.4% to $456M. The company maintains a robust gross margin of 42.7% and a net margin of 19.2%, outperforming Wipro in profitability. EBIT margin rose to 25.1%, showing strong operating leverage and consistent margin expansion.

Margin Strength vs. Growth Trajectory

Jack Henry commands higher margins and stronger net income growth, outpacing Wipro in profitability and efficiency. Wipro shows resilience with improved margins amid revenue stagnation but lags behind Jack Henry’s scale and margin expansion. For investors, Jack Henry’s profile offers superior margin power and growth momentum.

Financial Ratios Comparison

These vital ratios act as a diagnostic tool to expose the underlying fiscal health, valuation premiums, and capital efficiency of the companies compared below:

RatiosWipro Limited (WIT)Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY)
ROE16.0%21.4%
ROIC10.5%17.6%
P/E20.628.9
P/B3.36.2
Current Ratio2.721.27
Quick Ratio2.711.27
D/E0.230.00
Debt-to-Assets14.9%0.0%
Interest Coverage10.354.5
Asset Turnover0.700.78
Fixed Asset Turnover8.4810.75
Payout Ratio47.2%36.1%
Dividend Yield2.29%1.25%
Fiscal Year20252025

Efficiency & Valuation Duel: The Vital Signs

Financial ratios act as a company’s DNA, exposing hidden risks and operational excellence that shape investor confidence and portfolio decisions.

Wipro Limited

Wipro posts a solid ROE of 16.04% and a net margin near 15%, reflecting steady profitability. Its P/E of 20.6 suggests a fairly valued stock, though its P/B of 3.3 is less attractive. The company balances growth and returns with a 2.29% dividend yield, signaling reliable shareholder income alongside reinvestment into operations.

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

Jack Henry commands a higher ROE at 21.39% and a strong net margin of 19.19%, showcasing operational efficiency. However, its P/E of 28.88 flags an expensive valuation. With no debt and robust interest coverage, it sustains operational safety. Dividend yield sits modestly at 1.25%, reflecting a cautious shareholder payout approach.

Premium Valuation vs. Operational Safety

Wipro offers a very favorable overall ratio profile with balanced valuation and consistent dividends. Jack Henry delivers superior profitability but at a stretched valuation with lower yield. Wipro suits investors valuing steady income and risk control; Jack Henry fits those chasing growth with tolerance for premium pricing.

Which one offers the Superior Shareholder Reward?

I contrast Wipro Limited (WIT) and Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY) on dividends and buybacks. WIT yields 2.3%, with a 47% payout ratio, supported by strong FCF coverage (2.18x). JKHY delivers 1.25% yield, a 36% payout, and robust FCF coverage (2.94x). WIT’s buybacks appear modest, while JKHY’s active repurchase program significantly boosts total returns. WIT retains a higher current ratio (2.7 vs. 1.27), indicating better liquidity. Historically, JKHY’s disciplined capital allocation and buybacks drive superior shareholder value, despite a lower yield. I find JKHY’s balanced distribution and aggressive buybacks offer a more attractive total return profile in 2026.

Comparative Score Analysis: The Strategic Profile

The radar chart reveals the fundamental DNA and trade-offs of Wipro Limited and Jack Henry & Associates, Inc., highlighting their strategic strengths and balance:

scores comparison

Wipro excels in discounted cash flow (5 vs. 4), showing strong valuation metrics, while Jack Henry leads in return on assets (5 vs. 4) and debt-to-equity (4 vs. 3), indicating more efficient asset use and stronger balance sheet. Both tie on return on equity (4) and overall score (4). Wipro’s profile leans on valuation strength; Jack Henry presents a more balanced operational and financial risk profile.

Bankruptcy Risk: Solvency Showdown

Jack Henry’s Altman Z-Score of 12.08 vastly outpaces Wipro’s 5.06, both securely in the safe zone, signaling superior long-term solvency and lower bankruptcy risk for Jack Henry in the current cycle:

altman z score comparison

Financial Health: Quality of Operations

Jack Henry scores 8 on the Piotroski F-Score, demonstrating very strong financial health supported by robust internal operations. Wipro’s score of 5 indicates average health, suggesting potential red flags in operational efficiency or profitability compared to Jack Henry:

piotroski f score comparison

How are the two companies positioned?

This section dissects the operational DNA of Wipro and Jack Henry by comparing their revenue distribution and internal strengths and weaknesses. The goal is to confront their economic moats to identify the most resilient and sustainable competitive advantage today.

Revenue Segmentation: The Strategic Mix

This visual comparison dissects how both firms diversify their income streams and where their primary sector bets lie:

revenue by segment comparison

Wipro Limited lacks available segment data, so I cannot analyze its revenue mix. Jack Henry & Associates, however, shows a balanced portfolio in 2025: Payments lead with $873M, followed by Core Segment at $739M and Complementary at $675M. This diversified mix reduces concentration risk and anchors Jack Henry’s ecosystem lock-in, contrasting with companies relying heavily on a single dominant segment.

Strengths and Weaknesses Comparison

This table compares the Strengths and Weaknesses of Wipro Limited and Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.:

Wipro Limited Strengths

  • Favorable profitability ratios including net margin 14.74% and ROE 16.04%
  • Strong liquidity with current and quick ratios above 2.7
  • Low debt levels with debt-to-assets below 15% and strong interest coverage

Jack Henry & Associates Strengths

  • Higher profitability metrics with net margin 19.19% and ROE 21.39%
  • Zero debt and excellent interest coverage of 57.14
  • Diversified revenue streams across Complementary, Core, and Payments segments

Wipro Limited Weaknesses

  • Unfavorable price-to-book ratio at 3.3 indicating potential overvaluation
  • Neutral asset turnover at 0.7 suggests moderate operational efficiency

Jack Henry & Associates Weaknesses

  • Unfavorable valuation metrics with PE 28.88 and PB 6.18 indicating high price multiples
  • Current ratio at 1.27 signals lower short-term liquidity compared to peers

Both companies exhibit strong profitability and prudent debt management, but Jack Henry’s higher valuation multiples and lower liquidity pose caution. Wipro shows solid liquidity and valuation stability but lower operational efficiency by asset turnover. These factors shape their strategic financial positioning.

The Moat Duel: Analyzing Competitive Defensibility

A structural moat is the only reliable shield protecting long-term profits from relentless competitive pressure. Let’s dissect how each company defends its turf:

Wipro Limited: Scale and Cost Advantage in IT Services

Wipro leverages a vast global workforce and cost-efficient delivery to maintain stable margins and a solid 4.1% ROIC premium over WACC. However, its declining ROIC trend signals rising margin pressure in 2026.

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.: Niche Focus and Switching Costs in Financial Tech

Jack Henry’s moat stems from deep integration and high switching costs within U.S. financial institutions. With a 10.5% ROIC premium and rising profitability, it strengthens its grip through digital payment innovations in 2026.

Verdict: Cost Leadership vs. Sticky Customer Relationships

Jack Henry’s growing and wider moat, backed by superior ROIC and margin expansion, outmatches Wipro’s scale-based cost advantage with shrinking returns. Jack Henry is better positioned to defend and expand its market share.

Which stock offers better returns?

Over the past year, Wipro Limited’s shares declined steadily, while Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. showed moderate gains with accelerating momentum and higher volatility.

stock price comparison

Trend Comparison

Wipro Limited’s stock fell 18.45% over the past 12 months, reflecting a bearish trend with decelerating losses and a low volatility of 0.31. The price ranged between 3.77 and 2.52.

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. recorded a 2.61% gain over the same period, indicating a bullish trend with accelerating momentum and significant volatility at 9.21. Prices fluctuated from 146.26 to 191.28.

Jack Henry & Associates outperformed Wipro Limited, delivering positive returns and stronger price acceleration compared to Wipro’s sustained decline.

Target Prices

Analysts present a clear bullish consensus for Wipro Limited and Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

CompanyTarget LowTarget HighConsensus
Wipro Limited7.07.77.35
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.181220203.14

The target consensus for Wipro at 7.35 vastly exceeds its current price near 2.52, signaling strong upside potential. Jack Henry’s consensus target of 203.14 also sits well above its current 179.21, reflecting solid growth expectations from analysts.

Prorealtime Indicators

Don’t Let Luck Decide Your Entry Point

Optimize your entry points with our advanced ProRealTime indicators. You’ll get efficient buy signals with precise price targets for maximum performance. Start outperforming now!

How do institutions grade them?

Wipro Limited Grades

The following table summarizes recent grades from major financial institutions for Wipro Limited.

Grading CompanyActionNew GradeDate
UBSUpgradeNeutral2025-01-02
WedbushMaintainUnderperform2024-01-16
JP MorganMaintainUnderweight2023-05-24
BernsteinDowngradeUnderperform2023-03-22
BernsteinDowngradeUnderperform2023-03-21
Goldman SachsUpgradeBuy2022-09-13
Goldman SachsUpgradeBuy2022-09-12
Morgan StanleyDowngradeUnderweight2022-07-14
Morgan StanleyDowngradeUnderweight2022-07-13
MacquarieUpgradeOutperform2022-06-02

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. Grades

Below is a summary of recent institutional grades for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

Grading CompanyActionNew GradeDate
Wells FargoMaintainEqual Weight2026-01-30
DA DavidsonMaintainBuy2026-01-29
DA DavidsonMaintainBuy2026-01-28
Wolfe ResearchUpgradeOutperform2026-01-08
UBSMaintainNeutral2026-01-08
RBC CapitalUpgradeOutperform2025-12-16
BairdMaintainNeutral2025-12-15
Keefe, Bruyette & WoodsUpgradeOutperform2025-12-08
Goldman SachsMaintainNeutral2025-11-07
Compass PointUpgradeBuy2025-11-06

Which company has the best grades?

Jack Henry & Associates holds generally stronger grades with multiple Outperform and Buy ratings in 2025-2026. Wipro Limited shows mixed signals, with upgrades offset by several downgrades and Underperform ratings. Investors may see Jack Henry as favored by analysts currently, potentially signaling greater confidence.

Risks specific to each company

The following categories identify the critical pressure points and systemic threats facing both firms in the 2026 market environment:

1. Market & Competition

Wipro Limited

  • Faces intense global IT services competition with pressure on pricing and margins in India and emerging markets.

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

  • Operates in a niche US financial technology market but faces rising competition from fintech disruptors and evolving client demands.

2. Capital Structure & Debt

Wipro Limited

  • Maintains modest leverage (D/E 0.23) with favorable interest coverage, reflecting prudent capital structure.

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

  • Zero debt, very strong interest coverage, reflecting a conservative and low-risk financial profile.

3. Stock Volatility

Wipro Limited

  • Low beta (0.555) signals defensive trading behavior and lower sensitivity to market swings.

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

  • Moderate beta (0.71) indicates somewhat higher stock volatility but still below market average.

Wipro Limited

  • Exposure to regulatory risks in India, including government contracts and data privacy laws.

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

  • Regulatory compliance complexity in US financial services sector, including payment processing and data security.

5. Supply Chain & Operations

Wipro Limited

  • Global delivery model subject to geopolitical and operational disruptions, especially in India.

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

  • Primarily US-focused operations reduce global supply chain risks but increase dependency on domestic market stability.

6. ESG & Climate Transition

Wipro Limited

  • Increasing pressure to meet ESG standards amid rising global scrutiny on Indian IT sector sustainability.

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

  • Faces growing ESG demands in financial services technology, particularly data privacy and environmental impact.

7. Geopolitical Exposure

Wipro Limited

  • High exposure to India’s geopolitical environment and global trade tensions affecting IT outsourcing.

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

  • Limited geopolitical risk due to US-centric operations and diversified financial services client base.

Which company shows a better risk-adjusted profile?

Wipro’s main risk lies in geopolitical and operational exposure across emerging markets. Jack Henry’s key risk is competitive pressure from fintech innovation in a mature US market. Jack Henry’s zero debt and very strong Piotroski score underpin a stronger risk-adjusted profile. Wipro’s broad scale and favorable capital structure mitigate risks but market volatility and ESG pressures warrant caution. Recent data confirms Jack Henry’s superior financial resilience and operational focus.

Final Verdict: Which stock to choose?

Wipro Limited’s superpower lies in its robust capital efficiency and strong liquidity, reflecting disciplined cash management. However, its slightly declining ROIC trend is a point of vigilance for value-focused investors. It suits portfolios seeking steady, quality growth with moderate risk tolerance.

Jack Henry & Associates commands a durable moat through its niche software solutions and recurring revenue model. Its rising ROIC trend and superior profitability metrics offer better stability compared to Wipro. It aligns well with GARP investors aiming for growth balanced with financial strength.

If you prioritize resilient cash flow and operational efficiency, Wipro presents a compelling scenario due to its conservative balance sheet and attractive dividend yield. However, if you seek durable competitive advantages and accelerating profitability, Jack Henry outshines with a stronger moat and growth momentum, though at a premium valuation.

Disclaimer: Investment carries a risk of loss of initial capital. The past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Be sure to understand risks before making an investment decision.

Go Further

I encourage you to read the complete analyses of Wipro Limited and Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. to enhance your investment decisions: