In the rapidly evolving landscape of quantum computing, IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) stand out as two pioneering firms. Both companies operate within the same industry, focusing on innovative quantum technologies, yet they employ distinct strategies and target different market segments. IonQ emphasizes general-purpose quantum computing through cloud access, while D-Wave specializes in application-specific solutions and a comprehensive suite of development tools. This article will help you determine which of these intriguing companies deserves a spot in your investment portfolio.

IONQ_QBTS Featured Image
Table of contents

Company Overview

IonQ Overview

IonQ, Inc. is at the forefront of quantum computing, dedicated to developing general-purpose quantum systems. Founded in 2015 and headquartered in College Park, Maryland, IonQ has positioned itself as a leader in the industry by making its quantum computers available through well-known cloud platforms, including Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud. With a market capitalization of approximately $14.7B and a robust 20-qubit system, IonQ aims to revolutionize computational capabilities across various sectors. The company is led by CEO Niccolo Mcleod de Masi and employs around 407 professionals. IonQ’s focus on accessibility through cloud services aims to democratize quantum technology for businesses worldwide.

D-Wave Quantum Overview

D-Wave Quantum Inc., based in Burnaby, Canada, specializes in developing and delivering quantum computing systems and associated services. Established in 2020, D-Wave has introduced its fifth-generation quantum computer, Advantage, alongside a suite of tools and services such as the Ocean programming toolkit and Leap, a cloud-based access service. With a market capitalization of about $7.9B, D-Wave caters to diverse industries, including financial services, manufacturing, and life sciences, offering solutions for complex problems in areas like AI and cybersecurity. Under the leadership of CEO Alan E. Baratz, D-Wave employs approximately 216 staff, emphasizing collaboration with enterprises to deploy quantum applications effectively.

Key similarities and differences

Both IonQ and D-Wave operate in the quantum computing industry, focusing on providing quantum solutions through cloud platforms. IonQ emphasizes general-purpose quantum computing, while D-Wave offers specialized tools and services aimed at enterprise applications. Their distinct approaches reflect varying target markets and technological capabilities, with IonQ leaning towards accessibility and D-Wave emphasizing comprehensive software solutions.

Income Statement Comparison

The following table provides a comparative overview of the income statements for IonQ, Inc. and D-Wave Quantum Inc. for the most recent fiscal year, allowing us to analyze their financial performance.

MetricIonQ, Inc.D-Wave Quantum Inc.
Market Cap14.70B7.90B
Revenue43.07M8.83M
EBITDA-312.93M-138.05M
EBIT-331.59M-139.98M
Net Income-331.65M-143.88M
EPS-1.56-0.75
Fiscal Year20242024

Interpretation of Income Statement

In the most recent fiscal year, IonQ reported a significant increase in revenue to 43.07M, up from 22.04M in 2023, reflecting strong growth trends. However, both companies reported substantial net losses, with IonQ’s net income at -331.65M and D-Wave at -143.88M. Both firms experienced negative EBITDA, indicating ongoing challenges in cost management. Despite revenue growth, IonQ’s margins remain under pressure, and while D-Wave’s revenue showed slight improvement, its profitability remains elusive, highlighting the need for strategic adjustments to enhance financial health.

Financial Ratios Comparison

Below is a comparative overview of the financial metrics for IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) based on the most recent fiscal year data.

MetricIONQQBTS
ROE-86.40%-229.67%
ROIC-48.22%-45.01%
P/E-26.83-11.22
P/B23.18-4.96
Current Ratio10.506.14
Quick Ratio9.986.08
D/E0.050.61
Debt-to-Assets0.031.22
Interest Coverage0-19.82
Asset Turnover0.080.04
Fixed Asset Turnover0.690.77
Payout Ratio00
Dividend Yield00

Interpretation of Financial Ratios

IonQ exhibits a significantly higher current and quick ratio than D-Wave, indicating a stronger short-term liquidity position. However, both companies show negative ROE and ROIC, suggesting inefficiencies in generating returns from their equity and capital. The extremely high P/B ratio for IonQ may indicate overvaluation, while D-Wave’s negative ratios indicate substantial risk. Investors should be cautious, as both companies are struggling to generate profits.

Dividend and Shareholder Returns

Neither IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) nor D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) pays dividends, reflecting their focus on reinvesting in growth and technology development. Both firms are in a high-growth phase, prioritizing research and development. Despite the lack of dividends, I note that both companies engage in share buybacks, which can enhance shareholder value by reducing the number of outstanding shares. However, the sustainability of their strategies amidst ongoing losses poses potential risks. Thus, while their approaches may support long-term value creation, careful monitoring of financial performance is essential.

Strategic Positioning

IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) are key players in the rapidly evolving quantum computing market. IonQ holds a significant market share with its cloud-accessible quantum systems, while D-Wave offers a comprehensive suite of quantum solutions. Competitive pressure is mounting as both companies face technological disruption from emerging players. IonQ’s focus on general-purpose systems contrasts with D-Wave’s application-specific offerings, highlighting the diverse strategies in this innovative sector.

Stock Comparison

Over the past year, the stock prices of IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) have exhibited significant volatility and notable price movements, reflective of their dynamic trading patterns.

stock price comparison

Trend Analysis

IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has shown a remarkable price change of +310.83% over the past year, indicating a bullish trend. Despite this overall positive performance, the recent trend from September 14, 2025, to November 30, 2025, has experienced a decline of -11.35%. This recent downturn suggests a deceleration in momentum, with a standard deviation of 9.57 indicating moderate volatility. The stock reached a high of 73.28 and a low of 6.76 during the analyzed period.

D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) has demonstrated an exceptional price increase of +2660.26% over the same timeframe, also indicating a bullish trend. In the recent analysis period from September 14, 2025, to November 30, 2025, QBTS has seen a positive shift of +27.65%, albeit with a slight deceleration in trend slope of -0.13. The standard deviation of 6.26 reflects lower volatility compared to IONQ. The stock’s performance peaked at 38.33 and hit a low of 0.69 during the year.

Both stocks have shown impressive gains overall, yet recent trends suggest caution as they both navigate through periods of deceleration. As always, I recommend careful consideration and risk management when evaluating these stocks for your portfolio.

Analyst Opinions

Recent analyst recommendations for IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) show a consensus rating of C-. Analysts highlight concerns over their financial metrics, including low scores in discounted cash flow and return on equity. Notable analysts suggest a cautious approach, advocating for a hold position due to the companies’ high debt-to-equity ratios and overall weak performance indicators. Both stocks are currently viewed unfavorably, indicating a “sell” consensus for the year. As an investor, I advise careful consideration before making any decisions.

Stock Grades

I have analyzed the latest stock grades for IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS), both of which have received consistent ratings from reputable grading companies.

IonQ, Inc. Grades

Grading CompanyActionNew GradeDate
BenchmarkMaintainBuy2024-08-12
Goldman SachsMaintainNeutral2024-08-09
Craig-HallumMaintainBuy2024-08-08
NeedhamMaintainBuy2024-05-16
NeedhamMaintainBuy2024-05-09
Goldman SachsMaintainNeutral2024-02-29
NeedhamMaintainBuy2024-02-29
Morgan StanleyMaintainEqual Weight2023-10-30
NeedhamMaintainBuy2023-09-20
NeedhamMaintainBuy2023-09-19

D-Wave Quantum Inc. Grades

Grading CompanyActionNew GradeDate
BenchmarkMaintainBuy2025-11-10
RosenblattMaintainBuy2025-11-07
Canaccord GenuityMaintainBuy2025-11-07
Cantor FitzgeraldMaintainOverweight2025-11-07
B. Riley SecuritiesMaintainBuy2025-09-22
Piper SandlerMaintainOverweight2025-08-08
BenchmarkMaintainBuy2025-08-04
B. Riley SecuritiesMaintainBuy2025-07-23
B. Riley SecuritiesMaintainBuy2025-06-18
BenchmarkMaintainBuy2025-06-18

The overall trend in grades indicates a strong confidence in both companies, with multiple “Buy” ratings from reputable analysts. This suggests a positive outlook for both IonQ and D-Wave as they continue to be viewed favorably in the market.

Target Prices

The consensus among analysts indicates promising target prices for both IonQ, Inc. and D-Wave Quantum Inc.

CompanyTarget HighTarget LowConsensus
IonQ, Inc.755564.5
D-Wave Quantum Inc.402635.25

For IonQ, the target consensus of 64.5 suggests analysts expect significant upside potential from its current price of 49.53. Similarly, D-Wave’s target consensus of 35.25 indicates positive sentiment compared to its trading price of 22.78.

Strengths and Weaknesses

The following table summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) based on the most recent data.

CriterionIonQ, Inc. (IONQ)D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS)
DiversificationHigh (various cloud platforms)Moderate (quantum solutions for multiple industries)
ProfitabilityLow (-7.70% net profit margin)Low (-16.30% net profit margin)
InnovationHigh (leading in quantum computing technology)High (advanced quantum systems and services)
Global presenceStrong (partnerships with major cloud providers)Moderate (growing international market)
Market ShareEmerging (gaining traction)Emerging (competing in a niche market)
Debt levelLow (debt-to-equity ratio of 0.046)High (debt-to-equity ratio of 0.613)

Key takeaways indicate that while both companies are innovative and operate in a high-growth sector, IonQ appears to have a stronger diversification strategy and lower debt levels, which can be beneficial for risk management in investment.

Risk Analysis

In the following table, I outline the key risks associated with IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) to help you assess their potential impact on your investment decisions.

MetricIonQ, Inc.D-Wave Quantum Inc.
Market RiskHighModerate
Regulatory RiskModerateHigh
Operational RiskHighHigh
Environmental RiskLowLow
Geopolitical RiskModerateModerate

Both companies face significant market and operational risks. IonQ’s high market risk stems from its volatile stock price (beta of 2.59), while D-Wave contends with regulatory challenges in the evolving quantum computing sector, making it essential for investors to remain vigilant.

Which one to choose?

In comparing IonQ (IONQ) and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), both companies present intriguing prospects in the quantum computing sector. IonQ has shown a significant price change of 310.83% over the past year, albeit with a recent decline of 11.35%. Its market cap stands at approximately 8.9B, but it continues to report negative earnings and high operating costs, with a C- rating from analysts. On the other hand, D-Wave has experienced an impressive price change of 2660.26%, suggesting strong market interest, yet it also faces its challenges, including negative earnings and a C- rating.

For growth-oriented investors, I would lean towards D-Wave, given its substantial price momentum. Conversely, those prioritizing stability might find IonQ’s established market cap more appealing. Both companies inherently carry risks related to competition and market volatility, which are crucial to consider in your investment strategy.

Disclaimer: This article is not financial advice. Each investor is responsible for their own investment decisions.

Go further

I encourage you to read the complete analyses of IonQ, Inc. and D-Wave Quantum Inc. to enhance your investment decisions: