Home > Comparison > Basic Materials > LIN vs IFF
The strategic rivalry between Linde plc and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. shapes the specialty chemicals sector’s evolution. Linde operates as a capital-intensive industrial gas and engineering powerhouse, while IFF excels as a high-margin specialty ingredients and fragrances provider. This head-to-head captures the contrast between industrial scale and innovation-driven margins. This analysis will reveal which company’s trajectory delivers the superior risk-adjusted return for diversified portfolios.
Table of contents
Companies Overview
Linde plc and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. both hold influential roles in the specialty chemicals market, shaping diverse industrial and consumer sectors.
Linde plc: Global Industrial Gas Leader
Linde plc dominates the industrial gases market, generating revenue by supplying atmospheric and process gases worldwide. Its strategic focus in 2026 centers on expanding turnkey process plant engineering and strengthening its footprint across energy, healthcare, and manufacturing sectors. The company leverages a vast global network and engineering expertise as its core competitive advantage.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.: Consumer Ingredients Innovator
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. leads in specialty ingredients for cosmetics, food, and pharmaceuticals. It drives revenue through diverse segments, including Nourish, Scent, Health & Biosciences, and Pharma Solutions. Its 2026 strategy emphasizes innovation in natural and plant-based ingredients, targeting consumer product manufacturers across multiple continents with a strong focus on sustainability and health trends.
Strategic Collision: Similarities & Divergences
Both companies operate in specialty chemicals but diverge sharply in focus: Linde targets industrial gas infrastructure, while IFF pursues ingredient innovation for consumer products. The primary battleground is global market reach versus niche product specialization. Their distinct business models attract different investor profiles—Linde offers industrial scale and steady cash flows, whereas IFF bets on growth through product innovation and consumer trends.
Income Statement Comparison
This data dissects the core profitability and scalability of both corporate engines to reveal who dominates the bottom line:
| Metric | Linde plc (LIN) | International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 34B | 10.9B |
| Cost of Revenue | 19.3B | 6.95B |
| Operating Expenses | 5.79B | 2.53B |
| Gross Profit | 14.7B | 3.94B |
| EBITDA | 12.9B | -382M |
| EBIT | 9.03B | 0 |
| Interest Expense | 212M | 229M |
| Net Income | 6.9B | -374M |
| EPS | 14.67 | -1.46 |
| Fiscal Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Income Statement Analysis: The Bottom-Line Duel
This income statement comparison reveals which company runs a more efficient and profitable corporate engine through their financial results.
Linde plc Analysis
Linde’s revenue edged up modestly to $34B in 2025, while net income surged to $6.9B, reflecting strong bottom-line growth. Its gross margin stands healthy at 43%, and net margin remains robust at 20%. Despite a slight EBIT decline, Linde demonstrates solid operational efficiency and steady earnings momentum in the latest year.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. Analysis
IFF’s revenue declined to $10.9B in 2025, accompanied by a net loss of $374M, marking a significant downturn. Its gross margin contracted to 36%, and net margin turned negative at -3.4%. The company’s operating income slipped sharply, signaling challenges in cost control and profitability during the latest fiscal year.
Margin Strength vs. Profitability Decline
Linde outperforms IFF with superior margin health and consistent net income growth, underscoring operational efficiency. IFF’s shrinking revenue and sustained losses highlight structural weaknesses. For investors, Linde’s profile offers a more attractive combination of scale and profitability in the current market environment.
Financial Ratios Comparison
These vital ratios act as a diagnostic tool to expose the underlying fiscal health, valuation premiums, and capital efficiency of the companies analyzed:
| Ratios | Linde plc (LIN) | International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 18.0% | 0% |
| ROIC | 9.0% | 0% |
| P/E | 28.8 | -46.1 |
| P/B | 5.20 | 0 |
| Current Ratio | 0.88 | 0 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.74 | 0 |
| D/E (Debt-to-Equity) | 0.71 | 0 |
| Debt-to-Assets | 31.1% | 0% |
| Interest Coverage | 42.1 | -1.67 |
| Asset Turnover | 0.39 | 0 |
| Fixed Asset Turnover | 1.20 | 0 |
| Payout ratio | 40.8% | -109.4% |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 2.37% |
| Fiscal Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Efficiency & Valuation Duel: The Vital Signs
Financial ratios serve as a company’s DNA, unveiling hidden risks and operational strengths through key profitability and valuation metrics.
Linde plc
Linde posts a strong 18.0% ROE and a robust 20.3% net margin, signaling solid profitability. Its 28.8 P/E and 5.2 P/B reflect a stretched valuation compared to sector norms. Linde delivers a moderate 1.41% dividend yield, balancing shareholder returns with steady reinvestment in growth and innovation.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
IFF shows a negative net margin of -3.4% and zero ROE, indicating operational challenges. Its P/E of -46.1 and zero P/B appear favorable only due to losses, masking underlying weaknesses. IFF offers a 2.37% dividend yield, suggesting a focus on shareholder income despite poor profitability metrics.
Operational Strength vs. Profitability Struggles
Linde outperforms IFF on core profitability and operational efficiency, though at a premium valuation. IFF’s attractive valuation ratios are offset by deep profitability issues and weak coverage metrics. Investors seeking operational stability may prefer Linde, while those prioritizing yield amid risk might consider IFF’s profile.
Which one offers the Superior Shareholder Reward?
I compare Linde plc (LIN) and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) on dividend yield, payout ratio, and buyback intensity. LIN yields 1.41% with a 41% payout, backed by strong free cash flow (11B FCF per $72 revenue/share). LIN consistently funds dividends and buybacks sustainably. IFF offers a higher yield of 2.37% but reports negative net margins and erratic payout ratios, signaling weak profitability. Its free cash flow supports dividends but is less stable, and buyback activity is minimal. I trust LIN’s balanced distribution and robust cash flow over IFF’s riskier model. LIN delivers a more attractive total return profile in 2026.
Comparative Score Analysis: The Strategic Profile
The radar chart reveals the fundamental DNA and trade-offs of Linde plc and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., highlighting their core financial strengths and vulnerabilities:
Linde shows strength in ROE and ROA with top scores of 5 each, indicating efficient profit generation and asset use. However, it struggles with debt management and valuation, scoring 1 in Debt/Equity, P/E, and P/B. IFF leads in discounted cash flow with a perfect 5 but lags in profitability metrics (ROE and ROA at 1). IFF offers a better price-to-book score at 4, suggesting relative undervaluation. Linde’s profile is more balanced in operational efficiency, while IFF depends heavily on cash flow valuation.
Bankruptcy Risk: Solvency Showdown
Linde’s Altman Z-Score of 3.79 places it comfortably in the safe zone, signaling strong financial stability and low bankruptcy risk. IFF’s score of 1.85 signals caution, hovering in the grey zone, implying moderate risk in this economic cycle:
Financial Health: Quality of Operations
Linde’s Piotroski F-Score of 6 reflects solid financial health with no glaring red flags. IFF scores a 4, indicating average financial strength but some internal weaknesses that require attention:
How are the two companies positioned?
This section dissects the operational DNA of Linde and IFF by comparing their revenue distribution by segment and internal strengths and weaknesses. The goal is to confront their economic moats and reveal which business model offers the most resilient, sustainable competitive advantage today.
Revenue Segmentation: The Strategic Mix
This visual comparison dissects how Linde plc and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. diversify their income streams and where their primary sector bets lie:
Linde plc anchors its revenue in the Americas Segment at $14.4B, with significant contributions from EMEA ($8.4B), APAC ($6.6B), and Engineering ($2.3B), showing a well-spread geographic mix. In contrast, IFF pivots around its Nourish segment at $5.9B, supported by Scent ($2.4B), Health & Biosciences ($2.1B), and Pharma Solutions ($961M), reflecting a product-focused diversification. Linde’s geographic breadth mitigates regional risks, while IFF’s reliance on Nourish poses concentration risk but leverages strong category expertise.
Strengths and Weaknesses Comparison
This table compares the strengths and weaknesses of Linde plc and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.:
Linde plc Strengths
- Diversified global revenue streams across Americas, EMEA, APAC, and Engineering segments
- Favorable net margin (20.3%) and ROE (18.04%) indicate strong profitability
- High interest coverage (42.6) supports financial stability
- Favorable debt metrics with moderate leverage
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. Strengths
- Diverse product segmentation with Nourish, Scent, Pharma, and Health & Biosciences
- Favorable P/E and P/B ratios suggest market undervaluation
- Higher dividend yield (2.37%) attracts income-focused investors
- Favorable debt-to-equity and debt-to-assets ratios reflect low leverage
Linde plc Weaknesses
- Unfavorable valuation multiples (PE 28.82, PB 5.2) may limit upside
- Low current (0.88) and quick ratios (0.74) raise liquidity concerns
- Neutral ROIC barely above WACC could constrain value creation
- Unfavorable asset turnover (0.39) suggests less efficient asset use
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. Weaknesses
- Negative profitability with net margin (-3.43%), ROE, and ROIC at zero
- Poor liquidity indicated by zero current and quick ratios
- Unfavorable asset and fixed asset turnover ratios reflect operational inefficiency
- Interest coverage at zero signals risk in covering debt costs
Linde’s strengths lie in its broad geographic diversification and solid profitability, though valuation and liquidity require caution. IFF’s low leverage and dividend appeal contrast sharply with its profitability and liquidity weaknesses, underscoring operational challenges. Both companies face distinct risks that investors should monitor closely.
The Moat Duel: Analyzing Competitive Defensibility
A structural moat is the sole barrier protecting long-term profits from relentless competition erosion. Here is how Linde plc and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. stack up:
Linde plc: Engineering a Growing Capital Efficiency Moat
Linde’s primary advantage lies in its engineering and process expertise, driving high ROIC and stable margins near 20%. Its expanding hydrogen and specialty gas markets deepen this moat in 2026.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.: Intangible Assets Under Pressure
IFF’s moat centers on intangible assets like proprietary flavors and fragrances. Yet, declining ROIC and negative margins highlight weakening competitive positioning versus Linde, though innovation in health ingredients offers a recovery path.
Engineering Precision vs. Intangible Creativity: The Moat Showdown
Linde exhibits a wider, more stable moat with improving capital returns and margin resilience. I see Linde better positioned to defend and grow market share amid evolving industrial demands.
Which stock offers better returns?
Stock price movements over the past year reveal distinct trading dynamics, with Linde plc showing steady gains and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. exhibiting minor overall decline despite recent strength.
Trend Comparison
Linde plc’s stock rose 2.73% over the past 12 months, indicating a bullish trend with accelerating momentum and a high volatility measured by a 19.2 std deviation. It hit a peak of 486.45 and a low of 399.57.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. showed a slight overall decline of 0.1%, classifying its trend as bearish despite acceleration. Volatility is lower at 12.82 std deviation, with prices ranging from 59.55 to 105.12.
Linde plc delivered the highest market performance, outperforming IFF with a positive 12-month return versus IFF’s near flat, slightly negative trend.
Target Prices
Analysts present a moderately bullish consensus for Linde plc and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
| Company | Target Low | Target High | Consensus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linde plc (LIN) | 490 | 550 | 516 |
| International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) | 80 | 97 | 88.71 |
The target consensus suggests upside potential of roughly 7% for Linde from its current 481 USD price. IFF’s targets imply a 7% to 17% gain from its 83 USD level, indicating moderate analyst confidence.
Don’t Let Luck Decide Your Entry Point
Optimize your entry points with our advanced ProRealTime indicators. You’ll get efficient buy signals with precise price targets for maximum performance. Start outperforming now!
How do institutions grade them?
The following tables summarize recent grades assigned by reputable financial institutions for both companies:
Linde plc Grades
Below are recent grades from leading financial analysts for Linde plc:
| Grading Company | Action | New Grade | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citigroup | Maintain | Buy | 2026-02-06 |
| UBS | Maintain | Buy | 2026-02-06 |
| JP Morgan | Downgrade | Neutral | 2026-02-06 |
| Citigroup | Maintain | Buy | 2026-01-21 |
| RBC Capital | Maintain | Outperform | 2025-12-12 |
| UBS | Upgrade | Buy | 2025-11-11 |
| RBC Capital | Maintain | Outperform | 2025-11-06 |
| Citigroup | Maintain | Buy | 2025-11-03 |
| Seaport Global | Upgrade | Buy | 2025-11-03 |
| JP Morgan | Maintain | Overweight | 2025-11-03 |
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. Grades
The table below presents recent analyst grades for International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.:
| Grading Company | Action | New Grade | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo | Maintain | Overweight | 2026-02-13 |
| Citigroup | Maintain | Buy | 2026-02-13 |
| Oppenheimer | Upgrade | Outperform | 2026-02-13 |
| Mizuho | Maintain | Outperform | 2026-02-12 |
| Argus Research | Maintain | Buy | 2026-01-22 |
| Citigroup | Maintain | Buy | 2026-01-21 |
| UBS | Maintain | Neutral | 2026-01-12 |
| Barclays | Maintain | Overweight | 2025-11-07 |
| UBS | Maintain | Neutral | 2025-11-06 |
| B of A Securities | Maintain | Buy | 2025-10-14 |
Which company has the best grades?
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. shows a consistently positive outlook with multiple “Outperform” and “Buy” grades including recent upgrades. Linde plc also receives strong support, but includes a notable downgrade to “Neutral” by JP Morgan. Investors may perceive IFF’s more frequent upgrades and higher grades as a stronger vote of confidence.
Risks specific to each company
The following categories identify the critical pressure points and systemic threats facing both firms in the 2026 market environment:
1. Market & Competition
Linde plc
- Operates in a capital-intensive industrial gases market with strong global competitors.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
- Faces intense competition in specialty chemicals and consumer ingredient markets, driven by innovation and consolidation.
2. Capital Structure & Debt
Linde plc
- Moderate debt-to-equity ratio (~0.71) with strong interest coverage (42.6) signals manageable leverage.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
- Extremely low or zero reported debt, but weak interest coverage (0), raising concerns on financial reporting and liquidity.
3. Stock Volatility
Linde plc
- Beta of 0.85 indicates below-market volatility, suggesting relative price stability.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
- Beta above 1 (1.04) signals higher sensitivity to market swings and greater stock price volatility.
4. Regulatory & Legal
Linde plc
- Subject to environmental and safety regulations typical of chemicals and industrial gas sectors globally.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
- Faces regulatory scrutiny in food, pharma, and cosmetics sectors, with evolving compliance demands on natural ingredients.
5. Supply Chain & Operations
Linde plc
- Complex global supply chains for gases and plant construction, vulnerable to raw material price shifts.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
- Relies on agricultural inputs and specialty chemicals, sensitive to climate events and supply disruptions.
6. ESG & Climate Transition
Linde plc
- Increasing pressure to decarbonize industrial gas production; ESG compliance critical for long-term contracts.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
- Faces challenges integrating sustainability in sourcing natural ingredients and reducing carbon footprint.
7. Geopolitical Exposure
Linde plc
- Operates globally, exposed to trade tensions and regulatory changes across multiple continents.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
- Concentrated in North America and Europe, but with growing exposure to emerging markets and geopolitical risks.
Which company shows a better risk-adjusted profile?
Linde’s most impactful risk is its moderately high leverage amid capital-intensive operations, though strong interest coverage mitigates distress. IFF’s critical risk is its poor profitability and financial ratios, signaling operational weakness and higher bankruptcy risk. Linde’s Altman Z-Score firmly places it in the safe zone (3.79), while IFF lingers in the grey zone (1.85). Despite Linde’s slightly unfavorable liquidity ratios, its stable cash flows and lower stock volatility offer a more favorable risk-adjusted profile. IFF’s negative net margin and zero interest coverage highlight urgent financial strain.
Final Verdict: Which stock to choose?
Linde plc’s superpower lies in its robust profitability and steadily growing return on invested capital, signaling improving operational efficiency. However, its stretched liquidity ratios warrant caution. It suits investors targeting a solid industrial leader with modest growth and some leverage risk—ideal for those seeking steady income with growth potential.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. boasts a strategic moat through its strong brand portfolio and recurring revenue streams, providing resilience even amid recent earnings weakness. Compared to Linde, it offers a safer balance sheet profile but faces challenges in profitability and declining returns. It fits well in a GARP portfolio focused on stability and future turnaround potential.
If you prioritize consistent profitability and improving capital returns, Linde outshines as the compelling choice due to its operational strength and growth trajectory. However, if you seek defensive positioning with brand-driven recurring revenues and better balance sheet safety, International Flavors & Fragrances offers better stability despite current earnings headwinds.
Disclaimer: Investment carries a risk of loss of initial capital. The past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Be sure to understand risks before making an investment decision.
Go Further
I encourage you to read the complete analyses of Linde plc and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. to enhance your investment decisions:
