Home > Comparison > Technology > GRMN vs FTV
The strategic rivalry between Garmin Ltd. and Fortive Corporation shapes the competitive dynamics of the Technology sector’s hardware and equipment industry. Garmin operates as a diversified developer of consumer and professional wireless devices, while Fortive focuses on engineered products, software, and professional services across multiple industrial verticals. This analysis pits Garmin’s product innovation against Fortive’s service integration to identify which offers superior risk-adjusted returns for a diversified portfolio.
Table of contents
Companies Overview
Garmin Ltd. and Fortive Corporation stand as influential players in the hardware and equipment sector, each commanding unique industry niches.
Garmin Ltd.: Precision in Consumer and Avionics Hardware
Garmin Ltd. excels as a global leader in wireless devices spanning fitness, outdoor, aviation, marine, and automotive markets. Its core revenue stems from designing and manufacturing smartwatches, GPS navigators, avionics systems, and marine electronics. In 2026, Garmin sharpens its strategic focus on integrated platforms like Garmin Connect to enhance user engagement and ecosystem stickiness.
Fortive Corporation: Engineered Solutions for Industrial Efficiency
Fortive Corporation operates as a diversified industrial technology provider delivering professional tools, software, and services across healthcare, manufacturing, and energy sectors. Its revenue engine revolves around connected reliability tools and precision instruments marketed under multiple strong brands. The company’s 2026 strategy emphasizes expanding its intelligent operating solutions and healthcare services to drive recurring revenue streams.
Strategic Collision: Similarities & Divergences
Both companies prioritize hardware innovation, yet Garmin embraces a consumer-facing, integrated ecosystem while Fortive champions industrial software and service-driven solutions. Their battleground lies in leveraging technology to improve operational efficiency and user experience. Garmin’s growth hinges on ecosystem cohesion, whereas Fortive’s investment profile centers on diversified industrial exposure and steady cash flow from subscription services.
Income Statement Comparison
The following data dissects the core profitability and scalability of both corporate engines to reveal who dominates the bottom line:
| Metric | Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) | Fortive Corporation (FTV) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 6.30B | 6.23B |
| Cost of Revenue | 2.60B | 2.50B |
| Operating Expenses | 2.10B | 2.55B |
| Gross Profit | 3.70B | 3.73B |
| EBITDA | 1.77B | 1.67B |
| EBIT | 1.59B | 1.12B |
| Interest Expense | 0 | 153M |
| Net Income | 1.41B | 833M |
| EPS | 7.35 | 2.39 |
| Fiscal Year | 2024 | 2024 |
Income Statement Analysis: The Bottom-Line Duel
This income statement comparison reveals which company operates with superior efficiency and profitability in their core business engines.
Garmin Ltd. Analysis
Garmin’s revenue rose sharply from $4.19B in 2020 to $6.30B in 2024, with net income climbing from $992M to $1.41B. The firm sustains robust margins, boasting a gross margin near 59% and a net margin over 22% in the latest year. Its EBIT margin surged nearly 46% year-over-year, signaling strong operational momentum and disciplined cost control.
Fortive Corporation Analysis
Fortive posted revenue growth to $6.23B in 2024 but slipped to $5.14B in 2025, dragging net income down from $833M to $579M. Despite a higher gross margin around 61%, its net margin halved to 11.3% in 2025. EBIT and net margins have contracted, reflecting margin pressure and weakening profitability amidst declining revenues.
Margin Strength vs. Revenue Resilience
Garmin demonstrates superior margin health and consistent revenue and profit growth, outperforming Fortive’s volatile top line and weakening margins. Garmin’s efficient capital deployment and expanding earnings profile position it as the fundamentally stronger business. Investors focused on stable, margin-driven growth may favor Garmin’s resilient income dynamics.
Financial Ratios Comparison
These vital ratios act as a diagnostic tool to expose the underlying fiscal health, valuation premiums, and capital efficiency of the companies compared below:
| Ratios | Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) | Fortive Corporation (FTV) |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 18.0% | 9.0% |
| ROIC | 16.3% | 7.4% |
| P/E | 28.5 | 30.2 |
| P/B | 5.13 | 2.71 |
| Current Ratio | 3.54 | 0.71 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.56 | 0.58 |
| D/E (Debt-to-Equity) | 0.021 | 0.50 |
| Debt-to-Assets | 1.7% | 27.3% |
| Interest Coverage | 0 | 7.54 |
| Asset Turnover | 0.65 | 0.44 |
| Fixed Asset Turnover | 4.49 | 19.1 |
| Payout ratio | 40.6% | 15.9% |
| Dividend yield | 1.42% | 0.53% |
| Fiscal Year | 2024 | 2025 |
Efficiency & Valuation Duel: The Vital Signs
Financial ratios act as the company’s DNA, revealing hidden risks and operational excellence behind surface-level metrics.
Garmin Ltd.
Garmin delivers strong profitability with a 17.98% ROE and a robust 22.41% net margin. Valuation appears stretched, reflected in a high 28.5 P/E and 5.13 P/B ratio. The company maintains a prudent dividend yield of 1.42%, balancing shareholder returns with reinvestment in R&D, which supports sustained growth.
Fortive Corporation
Fortive shows modest profitability, with an 8.98% ROE and an 11.26% net margin, signaling lower operational efficiency. The valuation is also stretched, with a 30.16 P/E ratio. Fortive’s dividend yield is weak at 0.53%, and the firm favors debt leverage and capital expenditures over robust cash returns to shareholders.
Premium Valuation vs. Operational Safety
Garmin offers stronger returns on equity and margin efficiency but trades at premium multiples. Fortive carries higher financial risk and lower profitability despite moderate valuation. Investors prioritizing operational safety and consistent profitability may lean toward Garmin’s profile, while those tolerant of leverage and growth investment might consider Fortive.
Which one offers the Superior Shareholder Reward?
I observe Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) delivers a more balanced shareholder reward compared to Fortive Corporation (FTV). Garmin’s dividend yield stands at 1.42% with a payout ratio near 40%, signaling a solid income stream covered comfortably by free cash flow (6.4B FCF per share). It pairs this with moderate buybacks, enhancing total return sustainably. In contrast, Fortive yields just 0.53% with a low 13-16% payout ratio, favoring reinvestment over immediate distributions. Fortive’s buybacks are more aggressive but coupled with higher leverage and weaker liquidity ratios, raising sustainability concerns. For 2026, Garmin’s disciplined dividend plus steady buybacks form a superior, lower-risk total return profile.
Comparative Score Analysis: The Strategic Profile
The radar chart reveals the fundamental DNA and trade-offs of Garmin Ltd. and Fortive Corporation, highlighting their core financial strengths and valuation nuances:
Garmin Ltd. shows a more balanced profile with strong ROE (4) and ROA (5) scores, paired with a healthy debt-to-equity (4). Fortive leans on a higher DCF score (4) but struggles with leverage (2). Both face valuation headwinds with low P/E (2) scores, yet Fortive’s moderate P/B (3) suggests slightly better market pricing discipline.
Bankruptcy Risk: Solvency Showdown
Garmin’s Altman Z-Score of 13.91 far exceeds Fortive’s 3.58, signaling Garmin’s exceptional long-term solvency and low bankruptcy risk, while Fortive remains safely above distress but closer to caution:
Financial Health: Quality of Operations
Fortive’s Piotroski F-Score of 7 indicates strong operational quality and internal financial health, outperforming Garmin’s average score of 5. Garmin’s score suggests moderate strength but reveals potential red flags in profitability or efficiency metrics:
How are the two companies positioned?
This section dissects the operational DNA of Garmin and Fortive by comparing their revenue distribution by segment and internal dynamics. The goal is to confront their economic moats and identify which model offers the most resilient competitive advantage today.
Revenue Segmentation: The Strategic Mix
This visual comparison dissects how Garmin Ltd. and Fortive Corporation diversify their income streams and where their primary sector bets lie:
Garmin leans on a diverse portfolio with Outdoor at $1.96B and Fitness at $1.77B anchoring revenue, complemented by Aviation and Marine segments. Fortive pivots on three large segments: Intelligent Operating Solutions at $2.71B, Precision Technologies $2.23B, and Advanced Healthcare Solutions $1.29B. Garmin’s spread reduces concentration risk, while Fortive’s focused mix suggests strong infrastructure dominance but higher dependency on fewer segments.
Strengths and Weaknesses Comparison
This table compares the Strengths and Weaknesses of Garmin Ltd. and Fortive Corporation:
Garmin Strengths
- Diverse revenue streams from Automotive, Aviation, Fitness, Marine, and Outdoor segments
- Favorable net margin of 22.41%
- Strong ROE of 17.98% and ROIC of 16.28%
- Low debt levels with debt-to-assets at 1.69%
- Solid global presence across Americas, EMEA, and Asia Pacific
- High fixed asset turnover at 4.49
Fortive Strengths
- Broad product portfolio in Healthcare, Operating Solutions, and Precision Technologies
- Favorable net margin of 11.26% and WACC at 7.86%
- Moderate debt with debt-to-assets at 27.31% and interest coverage of 7.0
- Robust fixed asset turnover at 19.06
- Significant U.S. market presence and expanding international footprint
- Steady revenue growth in key segments
Garmin Weaknesses
- Unfavorable high P/E of 28.5 and PB of 5.13 indicating potentially expensive valuation
- High current ratio of 3.54 may suggest inefficient asset use
- Neutral asset turnover at 0.65 limits operational efficiency
- Dividend yield moderate at 1.42%
- Limited innovation data provided
- Market share details unspecified
Fortive Weaknesses
- Low current ratio of 0.71 and quick ratio of 0.58 indicate liquidity risks
- Unfavorable ROE of 8.98% below sector benchmarks
- Unfavorable P/E of 30.16 and low dividend yield of 0.53%
- Asset turnover weak at 0.44, hinting at less efficient asset use
- Market share and innovation specifics not disclosed
Both companies show strengths in diversified revenue and solid segments but face valuation and liquidity challenges. Garmin’s low leverage and profitability contrast with Fortive’s higher debt and weaker liquidity, impacting strategic flexibility.
The Moat Duel: Analyzing Competitive Defensibility
A structural moat defends long-term profits from relentless competitive erosion. Without it, market share and margins erode rapidly:
Garmin Ltd.: Intangible Assets with Robust ROIC Stability
Garmin leverages strong brand recognition and proprietary fitness and navigation software, reflected in a 7.8% ROIC advantage over WACC. Margin stability suggests its moat endures, while new wearable tech could deepen defensibility in 2026.
Fortive Corporation: Operational Efficiency Amid Margin Pressure
Fortive relies on cost advantage and diversified industrial software, contrasting Garmin’s asset-heavy moat. Despite a growing ROIC trend, its negative spread versus WACC signals value destruction. Expansion into healthcare software may reverse margin declines in 2026.
Verdict: Brand Strength vs. Cost Discipline in Tech Hardware
Garmin’s wider moat stems from consistent value creation and stable margins, unlike Fortive’s narrower, efficiency-based moat under margin pressure. Garmin is better positioned to defend market share in 2026’s competitive landscape.
Which stock offers better returns?
The past year shows Garmin Ltd. surging with strong momentum, while Fortive Corporation declines overall but gains recently, reflecting contrasting trading dynamics and investor sentiment.
Trend Comparison
Garmin Ltd. records a 38.82% price rise over the past year, marking a bullish trend with accelerating gains. The stock’s volatility is high, with a 27.8 std deviation and a peak at 257.06.
Fortive Corporation’s stock falls 6.53% over the same period, indicating a bearish trend despite recent acceleration. Its volatility is moderate at 4.16 std deviation, with a high of 64.82 and a low of 46.55.
Garmin outperforms Fortive, delivering the highest market return with a sustained bullish trend versus Fortive’s overall decline despite recent recovery.
Target Prices
Analysts present a clear target consensus for Garmin Ltd. and Fortive Corporation, reflecting measured optimism.
| Company | Target Low | Target High | Consensus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garmin Ltd. | 193 | 310 | 240 |
| Fortive Corporation | 51 | 70 | 59.83 |
Garmin’s target consensus at 240 suggests upside from its current 202.33 price, indicating potential growth. Fortive’s consensus near 59.83 aligns closely with its 60.12 trading price, implying stability.
Don’t Let Luck Decide Your Entry Point
Optimize your entry points with our advanced ProRealTime indicators. You’ll get efficient buy signals with precise price targets for maximum performance. Start outperforming now!
How do institutions grade them?
The following summarizes institution grades for Garmin Ltd. and Fortive Corporation:
Garmin Ltd. Grades
Here are Garmin’s recent grades from leading financial institutions:
| Grading Company | Action | New Grade | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barclays | Upgrade | Equal Weight | 2026-01-16 |
| Tigress Financial | Maintain | Strong Buy | 2025-12-19 |
| Longbow Research | Upgrade | Buy | 2025-12-03 |
| Morgan Stanley | Maintain | Underweight | 2025-10-30 |
| Barclays | Maintain | Underweight | 2025-10-30 |
| Tigress Financial | Maintain | Strong Buy | 2025-09-30 |
| Morgan Stanley | Maintain | Underweight | 2025-09-19 |
| Morgan Stanley | Maintain | Underweight | 2025-07-31 |
| Barclays | Maintain | Underweight | 2025-07-31 |
| JP Morgan | Maintain | Neutral | 2025-07-17 |
Fortive Corporation Grades
Below are recent grades assigned to Fortive by reputable firms:
| Grading Company | Action | New Grade | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo | Maintain | Equal Weight | 2026-02-05 |
| RBC Capital | Maintain | Sector Perform | 2026-02-05 |
| Citigroup | Maintain | Neutral | 2026-02-05 |
| JP Morgan | Downgrade | Underweight | 2026-01-16 |
| Mizuho | Downgrade | Underperform | 2026-01-05 |
| Wells Fargo | Maintain | Equal Weight | 2025-12-22 |
| Citigroup | Maintain | Neutral | 2025-12-08 |
| Morgan Stanley | Maintain | Equal Weight | 2025-11-05 |
| Baird | Maintain | Outperform | 2025-11-04 |
| JP Morgan | Maintain | Neutral | 2025-10-30 |
Which company has the best grades?
Garmin Ltd. generally receives stronger grades, including multiple “Strong Buy” and “Buy” ratings. Fortive’s grades mainly cluster around “Equal Weight” and “Neutral,” with some recent downgrades. This disparity may influence investor sentiment toward Garmin as more favorably rated.
Risks specific to each company
The following categories identify the critical pressure points and systemic threats facing both firms in the 2026 market environment:
1. Market & Competition
Garmin Ltd.
- Faces intense competition in consumer wearables and aviation tech segments, risking margin pressure.
Fortive Corporation
- Competes in diversified industrial and healthcare markets, facing pricing pressure and innovation demands.
2. Capital Structure & Debt
Garmin Ltd.
- Maintains minimal debt (D/E 0.02), highly conservative, lowering financial risk substantially.
Fortive Corporation
- Moderate leverage (D/E 0.5) increases financial risk but supports growth investments.
3. Stock Volatility
Garmin Ltd.
- Beta near 1 (0.999) indicates stock moves closely with market, stable volatility.
Fortive Corporation
- Slightly higher beta (1.033) suggests modestly greater sensitivity to market swings.
4. Regulatory & Legal
Garmin Ltd.
- Exposed to aviation and wireless device regulations globally, increasing compliance costs.
Fortive Corporation
- Faces regulatory scrutiny in healthcare and industrial safety sectors, posing compliance challenges.
5. Supply Chain & Operations
Garmin Ltd.
- Global supply chain for electronics vulnerable to geopolitical disruptions and component shortages.
Fortive Corporation
- Complex manufacturing and service operations susceptible to raw material price volatility and logistics issues.
6. ESG & Climate Transition
Garmin Ltd.
- Moderate ESG focus; risks include resource use and e-waste management in hardware production.
Fortive Corporation
- Stronger ESG initiatives but exposed to climate risks in manufacturing and operational footprint.
7. Geopolitical Exposure
Garmin Ltd.
- Swiss base with global sales enhances diversification but exposes to currency and trade tensions.
Fortive Corporation
- US-based but heavily dependent on international markets, vulnerable to tariffs and policy shifts.
Which company shows a better risk-adjusted profile?
Garmin’s minimal debt and stable stock volatility create a solid financial foundation. Fortive’s higher leverage and operational complexity elevate its risk profile despite strong ESG efforts. Garmin’s dominant margin and return metrics signal better resilience. Fortive’s supply chain and regulatory exposures are more pronounced. Garmin’s 3.54 current ratio, although flagged unfavorable, reflects strong liquidity compared to Fortive’s 0.71, a red flag in working capital management. Overall, Garmin offers a superior risk-adjusted profile amid 2026 market uncertainties.
Final Verdict: Which stock to choose?
Garmin Ltd. stands out as a cash-generating powerhouse with a robust economic moat supported by a strong ROIC well above its WACC. Its unmatched operational efficiency fuels steady value creation. A point of vigilance remains its elevated valuation multiples, which could temper upside. Garmin aligns well with aggressive growth portfolios seeking quality and durability.
Fortive Corporation’s strategic moat lies in its asset-light model and improving profitability trajectory despite currently shedding value. Its recurring revenue streams and steady cash flow underpin a more conservative safety profile compared to Garmin. Fortive suits investors favoring GARP strategies who prioritize stability with moderate growth potential.
If you prioritize aggressive growth and enduring competitive advantages, Garmin outshines due to its superior capital efficiency and consistent value creation. However, if you seek better stability with an improving profitability trend, Fortive offers a compelling scenario despite its current valuation and operational challenges. Both stocks present distinct risk-reward profiles tailored to different investor appetites.
Disclaimer: Investment carries a risk of loss of initial capital. The past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Be sure to understand risks before making an investment decision.
Go Further
I encourage you to read the complete analyses of Garmin Ltd. and Fortive Corporation to enhance your investment decisions:
