Home > Comparison > Financial Services > MTB vs CFG
The strategic rivalry between M&T Bank Corporation and Citizens Financial Group defines the competitive landscape of regional banking in the U.S. M&T operates as a diversified commercial and retail bank with a strong foothold in mid-sized markets. Conversely, Citizens emphasizes a broader branch network and digital consumer services. This analysis pits their distinct operational models against each other to reveal which offers the superior risk-adjusted return for a diversified portfolio in financial services.
Table of contents
Companies Overview
M&T Bank Corporation and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. shape regional banking’s competitive landscape in the U.S.
M&T Bank Corporation: Regional Banking Powerhouse
M&T Bank dominates as a regional bank holding company, generating revenue primarily through commercial and retail banking services. Its core income stems from business banking, commercial real estate lending, and residential mortgage banking. The 2021 strategic focus emphasized expanding its commercial lending and wealth management capabilities, alongside broadening digital banking access across its 688 offices.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.: Diverse Regional Bank
Citizens Financial Group operates as a bank holding company serving retail and commercial clients with a broad product suite. It earns revenue via consumer banking, including mortgages, credit cards, and digital deposits, and commercial banking with lending, treasury, and capital markets services. In 2021, it concentrated on expanding its branch network and enhancing digital platforms to serve over 1,200 branches and 3,300 ATMs.
Strategic Collision: Similarities & Divergences
Both banks pursue regional market dominance through commercial and retail banking but diverge in scale and approach. M&T leans into a traditional, relationship-driven model emphasizing commercial real estate, while Citizens invests heavily in digital innovation and a wider geographic footprint. Their competition centers on middle-market commercial lending and digital consumer engagement. This creates distinct investment profiles: M&T as a stable, asset-focused player and Citizens as a growth-oriented, tech-enabled challenger.
Income Statement Comparison
This data dissects the core profitability and scalability of both corporate engines to reveal who dominates the bottom line:
| Metric | M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) | Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 12.31B | 11.15B |
| Cost of Revenue | 3.12B | 3.37B |
| Operating Expenses | 5.49B | 5.45B |
| Gross Profit | 9.19B | 7.78B |
| EBITDA | 3.96B | 2.69B |
| EBIT | 3.69B | 2.33B |
| Interest Expense | 3.54B | 3.81B |
| Net Income | 2.85B | 1.83B |
| EPS | 17.1 | 3.9 |
| Fiscal Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Income Statement Analysis: The Bottom-Line Duel
This income statement comparison reveals which company converts revenue into profit more efficiently and sustains financial momentum.
M&T Bank Corporation Analysis
M&T Bank’s revenue rose from 6.1B in 2021 to 13.4B in 2024 before dipping to 12.3B in 2025. Net income expanded steadily from 1.8B to 2.8B over the period. Its gross margin remains robust at 74.6%, while net margin improved to 23.2%, signaling strong cost control and efficiency gains in 2025 despite a slight revenue pullback.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. Analysis
Citizens Financial’s revenue grew from 7.0B in 2021 to 12.3B in 2024, then declined to 11.1B in 2025. Net income peaked at 2.3B in 2021 but fell to 1.8B in 2025. Its gross margin at 69.8% and net margin at 16.4% trail MTB, though Citizens showed solid EBIT and net margin growth last year, reflecting improving operational leverage.
Margin Strength vs. Revenue Expansion
M&T Bank outperforms Citizens Financial on margin metrics and net income growth, highlighting superior profitability and cost management. Citizens Financial delivers respectable revenue scale but struggles with margin compression and net income decline. Investors favor M&T’s profile for its stronger fundamental earnings power and margin resilience.
Financial Ratios Comparison
These vital ratios act as a diagnostic tool to expose underlying fiscal health, valuation premiums, and capital efficiency of two leading regional banks:
| Ratios | M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) | Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.8% | 7.0% |
| ROIC | 6.8% | 4.3% |
| P/E | 11.5 | 13.8 |
| P/B | 1.13 | 0.96 |
| Current Ratio | 0.32 | 1.04 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.32 | 1.04 |
| D/E (Debt-to-Equity) | 0.45 | 0.43 |
| Debt-to-Assets | 6.1% | 5.0% |
| Interest Coverage | 1.04 | 0.61 |
| Asset Turnover | 0.058 | 0.049 |
| Fixed Asset Turnover | 0 | 12.18 |
| Payout Ratio | 33% | 41% |
| Dividend Yield | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Fiscal Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Efficiency & Valuation Duel: The Vital Signs
Financial ratios act as a company’s DNA, revealing hidden risks and operational excellence beneath surface-level numbers.
M&T Bank Corporation
M&T Bank shows a solid net margin of 23.16%, indicating strong profitability, but a modest ROE of 9.77% lags behind peers. Its P/E of 11.54 and P/B of 1.13 suggest the stock trades at a reasonable valuation. The 2.83% dividend yield rewards shareholders, reflecting a balanced capital return approach.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
Citizens Financial posts a lower net margin at 16.42% and weaker ROE of 6.96%, signaling less efficient equity use. The P/E ratio of 13.76 is slightly stretched versus M&T, though the P/B is attractive at 0.96. A 2.94% dividend yield supports steady income, while efficient fixed asset turnover points to operational strength.
Valuation Discipline vs. Operational Efficiency
Citizens Financial offers a more favorable overall ratio profile with 57% favorable metrics, reflecting operational efficiency and moderate risk. M&T Bank’s higher profitability and dividend yield come with more warning signs, such as weaker asset turnover. Investors seeking income may prefer M&T, while those valuing operational discipline might lean toward Citizens.
Which one offers the Superior Shareholder Reward?
I observe M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) delivers a balanced distribution approach with a 2.8% dividend yield and a moderate 33% payout ratio. MTB supports dividends with strong free cash flow, maintaining steady buybacks that enhance shareholder value sustainably. Citizens Financial Group (CFG) offers a slightly higher 2.9% dividend yield but with a higher payout ratio near 40%, risking dividend sustainability. CFG’s buyback intensity is less transparent, and reinvestment focus appears modest. I conclude MTB’s disciplined blend of dividends and buybacks offers a more attractive, sustainable total shareholder return profile in 2026.
Comparative Score Analysis: The Strategic Profile
The radar chart reveals the fundamental DNA and trade-offs of M&T Bank Corporation and Citizens Financial Group, Inc.:
M&T Bank stands out with a very favorable DCF score (5) compared to Citizens’ favorable 4, indicating stronger cash flow projections. Both share moderate returns on equity and assets (3 each), but their balance sheet strength is identical and moderate (debt-to-equity score of 2). Valuation metrics diverge; M&T’s P/E is moderately better (3 vs. 2), while Citizens shows a slightly stronger price-to-book score (3 vs. 2). M&T Bank’s profile is more DCF-driven, while Citizens balances valuation metrics more evenly.
Bankruptcy Risk: Solvency Showdown
The Altman Z-Score delta highlights significant solvency concerns for both firms in this cycle:
M&T Bank’s score of -0.44 places it deep in the distress zone, signaling acute bankruptcy risk. Citizens Financial fares slightly better at 0.28 but remains in distress. Historically, banks in this zone require urgent capital restructuring to survive prolonged economic stress.
Financial Health: Quality of Operations
Piotroski F-Scores reveal operational robustness differences between the two banks:
M&T Bank scores an impressive 8, indicating very strong financial health with solid profitability and efficiency. Citizens scores 7, still strong but showing marginally weaker internal metrics. M&T’s superior score suggests it manages internal risks and capital allocation more prudently under current market conditions.
How are the two companies positioned?
This section dissects the operational DNA of MTB and CFG by comparing their revenue distribution and internal dynamics, including strengths and weaknesses. The final objective is to confront their economic moats to identify which business model offers the most resilient and sustainable competitive advantage today.
Revenue Segmentation: The Strategic Mix
The following comparison dissects how M&T Bank Corporation and Citizens Financial Group diversify income streams and where each places its primary sector bets:
M&T Bank shows a more diversified revenue base with sizable contributions from Commercial Banking ($272M) and Retail Banking ($471M) in 2024. Conversely, Citizens Financial leans heavily on Service Charges and Fees ($417M) and Card Fees ($362M), reflecting concentration risk. M&T’s mix suggests ecosystem lock-in through multiple banking segments, while Citizens pivots on fee-heavy consumer services, exposing it to payment trends and regulatory shifts.
Strengths and Weaknesses Comparison
This table compares the Strengths and Weaknesses of M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG):
MTB Strengths
- Higher net margin at 23.16%
- Favorable PE at 11.54
- Strong dividend yield of 2.83%
- Low debt-to-assets ratio at 6.12%
- Diverse revenue streams across commercial, retail, and mortgage banking
CFG Strengths
- Favorable net margin at 16.42%
- Higher fixed asset turnover at 12.18
- Favorable current and quick ratios above 1
- Favorable PE at 13.76
- Slightly higher dividend yield at 2.94%
MTB Weaknesses
- Low current and quick ratios at 0.32 signal liquidity risk
- ROE (9.77%) below WACC (10.43%)
- Interest coverage barely above 1.0
- Low asset and fixed asset turnover ratios
- Global ratios opinion slightly unfavorable
CFG Weaknesses
- ROE (6.96%) and ROIC (4.25%) both below WACC (14.07%)
- Interest coverage weak at 0.61
- Asset turnover low at 0.05
- Higher WACC indicates costlier capital
- Global ratios opinion favorable but some operational inefficiencies
Overall, MTB shows stronger profitability and diversified revenue but faces liquidity and efficiency concerns. CFG maintains better liquidity and asset utilization but struggles with returns below capital costs. Both companies must address key operational and capital allocation challenges to enhance long-term value.
The Moat Duel: Analyzing Competitive Defensibility
A structural moat is the only reliable shield protecting long-term profits from relentless competitive erosion. Here’s how M&T Bank and Citizens Financial stack up:
M&T Bank Corporation: Relationship-Driven Regional Footprint
M&T Bank’s moat stems from deep client relationships and regional specialization. It shows stable margins but declining ROIC signals rising competitive pressure. Expansion into commercial real estate could deepen its moat if managed prudently.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.: Scale and Diversification in Banking
Citizens leverages broader geographic reach and diversified consumer and commercial banking. Despite higher operational scale, its ROIC declines faster than M&T’s, reflecting margin compression risks. Digital platform investments offer a path to restore competitiveness.
Relationship Depth vs. Scale Efficiency: Who Holds the Moat Edge?
Both banks suffer from shrinking ROIC well below WACC, signaling value destruction. However, M&T’s focused regional model offers a deeper moat through client intimacy. Citizens’ scale is an asset but currently less defensible. M&T is better positioned to defend market share amid tightening competition.
Which stock offers better returns?
The past year shows strong bullish momentum for both stocks, with notable price gains and distinct trading volume dynamics impacting their trajectories.
Trend Comparison
M&T Bank Corporation’s stock surged 55.23% over the past year, showing accelerated bullish momentum and a high volatility of 21.88%. Prices ranged from 134.56 to 221.57.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. outperformed with an 83.51% gain, accelerating upward with lower volatility at 7.49%. The price moved between 33.14 and 62.98.
Citizens Financial Group delivered the highest market performance with stronger overall gains and steadier volume trends compared to M&T Bank.
Target Prices
Analysts present a moderately bullish consensus for M&T Bank Corporation and Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
| Company | Target Low | Target High | Consensus |
|---|---|---|---|
| M&T Bank Corporation | 208 | 255 | 230.8 |
| Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 60 | 80 | 69.46 |
The target consensus for MTB at $230.8 suggests a 4% upside from its $221.57 price, indicating cautious optimism. CFG’s consensus at $69.46 implies roughly a 10% gain over the $62.98 current price, reflecting moderate analyst confidence.
Don’t Let Luck Decide Your Entry Point
Optimize your entry points with our advanced ProRealTime indicators. You’ll get efficient buy signals with precise price targets for maximum performance. Start outperforming now!
How do institutions grade them?
M&T Bank Corporation Grades
Here are recent institutional grades and rating actions for M&T Bank Corporation:
| Grading Company | Action | New Grade | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| RBC Capital | maintain | Outperform | 2026-01-20 |
| Jefferies | maintain | Buy | 2026-01-16 |
| Wolfe Research | downgrade | Peer Perform | 2026-01-07 |
| TD Cowen | maintain | Buy | 2026-01-07 |
| B of A Securities | downgrade | Neutral | 2026-01-07 |
| Evercore ISI Group | downgrade | In Line | 2026-01-06 |
| Barclays | maintain | Equal Weight | 2026-01-05 |
| Keefe, Bruyette & Woods | maintain | Market Perform | 2025-12-17 |
| Truist Securities | downgrade | Hold | 2025-12-12 |
| TD Cowen | maintain | Buy | 2025-10-20 |
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. Grades
These are the latest institutional grades and rating actions for Citizens Financial Group, Inc.:
| Grading Company | Action | New Grade | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Truist Securities | maintain | Hold | 2026-01-26 |
| Citigroup | maintain | Buy | 2026-01-26 |
| Argus Research | maintain | Buy | 2026-01-23 |
| RBC Capital | maintain | Outperform | 2026-01-22 |
| B of A Securities | maintain | Buy | 2026-01-22 |
| Morgan Stanley | maintain | Overweight | 2026-01-22 |
| Keefe, Bruyette & Woods | maintain | Outperform | 2026-01-22 |
| DA Davidson | maintain | Buy | 2026-01-22 |
| TD Cowen | maintain | Buy | 2026-01-22 |
| Raymond James | downgrade | Outperform | 2026-01-07 |
Which company has the best grades?
Citizens Financial Group holds more consistent buy and outperform ratings than M&T Bank. MTB shows several downgrades to neutral or hold, signaling mixed institutional confidence. Investors may see CFG as stronger on recent analyst sentiment.
Risks specific to each company
The following categories identify the critical pressure points and systemic threats facing both firms in the 2026 market environment:
1. Market & Competition
M&T Bank Corporation (MTB)
- Strong regional presence but faces pressure from fintech disruptors and larger banks.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG)
- Larger branch network but higher beta signals more exposure to competitive swings in regional banking.
2. Capital Structure & Debt
M&T Bank Corporation (MTB)
- Moderate debt-to-equity ratio (0.45) with favorable leverage but weak interest coverage (1.04x).
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG)
- Slightly lower debt-to-equity (0.43) but weaker interest coverage (0.61x) raises refinancing risk.
3. Stock Volatility
M&T Bank Corporation (MTB)
- Low beta (0.58) indicates defensive stock with lower market sensitivity.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG)
- Higher beta (1.09) suggests elevated volatility and sensitivity to market cycles.
4. Regulatory & Legal
M&T Bank Corporation (MTB)
- Regional bank with consistent regulatory compliance but exposed to localized regulatory changes.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG)
- Larger footprint across 14 states increases regulatory complexity and legal monitoring costs.
5. Supply Chain & Operations
M&T Bank Corporation (MTB)
- Relies on traditional branch network with moderate digital investments; operational efficiency challenged by low asset turnover.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG)
- Invests more in digital platforms; fixed asset turnover (12.18) suggests better operational efficiency.
6. ESG & Climate Transition
M&T Bank Corporation (MTB)
- ESG initiatives less transparent; potential risks from climate-sensitive loan portfolios.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG)
- Increasing ESG disclosures but still faces risks in fossil fuel financing and climate transition.
7. Geopolitical Exposure
M&T Bank Corporation (MTB)
- Primarily US-focused with minimal international exposure, limiting geopolitical risks.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG)
- Also US-centric but broader state coverage may expose it to varied regional political risks.
Which company shows a better risk-adjusted profile?
Citizens Financial Group carries higher market volatility and weaker interest coverage, increasing refinancing and earnings risks. M&T Bank suffers from poor liquidity ratios and low asset efficiency, signaling operational constraints. However, CFG’s stronger Piotroski score (7 vs. 8 for MTB) and favorable ratio profile suggest a better risk-adjusted stance. MTB’s distress-level Altman Z-score (-0.44) is a red flag compared to CFG’s marginally better but still distressed 0.28. Recent data highlight CFG’s superior operational efficiency and liquidity as the key differentiator.
Final Verdict: Which stock to choose?
M&T Bank Corporation excels as a cash-generating engine with a solid dividend yield and favorable valuation metrics. Its main point of vigilance is a persistently low current ratio, signaling liquidity constraints. This stock fits an Aggressive Growth portfolio willing to embrace operational risks for income and value appreciation.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. showcases a strategic moat through a more balanced liquidity profile and efficient asset utilization, evidenced by a stronger quick ratio and fixed asset turnover. It offers relatively better stability than M&T Bank, suiting a GARP (Growth at a Reasonable Price) investor seeking steady income with moderate risk exposure.
If you prioritize income generation with a value tilt, M&T Bank Corporation is the compelling choice due to its attractive dividend yield and earnings yield. However, if you seek a blend of growth and balance sheet resilience, Citizens Financial Group offers better stability and operational efficiency despite a slightly lower margin profile. Both present risks, notably their declining ROIC trends, which warrants cautious monitoring.
Disclaimer: Investment carries a risk of loss of initial capital. The past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Be sure to understand risks before making an investment decision.
Go Further
I encourage you to read the complete analyses of M&T Bank Corporation and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. to enhance your investment decisions:
