Home > Comparison > Technology > ADI vs IPGP
The strategic rivalry between Analog Devices, Inc. and IPG Photonics Corporation shapes the semiconductor industry’s future. Analog Devices operates as a diversified technology powerhouse, delivering integrated circuits and signal processing solutions. In contrast, IPG Photonics specializes in high-performance fiber lasers, focusing on precision materials processing. This analysis pits broad semiconductor leadership against niche technological innovation to identify which path offers superior risk-adjusted returns for a diversified portfolio.
Table of contents
Companies Overview
Analog Devices and IPG Photonics hold critical roles in the semiconductor sector with distinct technological approaches.
Analog Devices, Inc.: Leader in Mixed-Signal and Digital Signal Processing
Analog Devices dominates the semiconductor space by designing and marketing integrated circuits and subsystems that convert analog signals into digital data. Its core revenue engine relies on power management and signal processing products serving automotive, industrial, and communications markets. In 2026, the company focuses on enhancing high-performance amplifiers and microelectromechanical systems for broad industrial applications.
IPG Photonics Corporation: Pioneer in Fiber Laser Technology
IPG Photonics specializes in fiber lasers and amplifiers, driving revenue through sales of high-power laser systems used in materials processing and communications. The firm’s competitive advantage lies in its advanced laser technologies, including hybrid fiber-solid state lasers and integrated communications systems. Its strategic emphasis in 2026 centers on expanding laser system applications in medical and manufacturing sectors.
Strategic Collision: Similarities & Divergences
Both companies operate within semiconductors but diverge sharply: Analog Devices builds on a broad mixed-signal ecosystem, while IPG Photonics pursues a niche in fiber laser innovation. Their primary battle unfolds over industrial and communications technology markets. Analog Devices offers a diversified, large-cap profile; IPG Photoncs presents a specialized, growth-oriented investment case.
Income Statement Comparison
The following data dissects the core profitability and scalability of both corporate engines to reveal who dominates the bottom line:
| Metric | Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 11.0B | 977M |
| Cost of Revenue | 5.0B | 639M |
| Operating Expenses | 3.0B | 546M |
| Gross Profit | 6.0B | 338M |
| EBITDA | 5.0B | 76M |
| EBIT | 3.0B | 14M |
| Interest Expense | 318M | 0 |
| Net Income | 2.3B | -182M |
| EPS | 4.59 | -4.09 |
| Fiscal Year | 2025 | 2024 |
Income Statement Analysis: The Bottom-Line Duel
This income statement comparison exposes which company delivers superior operational efficiency and bottom-line strength through recent market cycles.
Analog Devices, Inc. Analysis
ADI’s revenue climbed steadily from 7.3B in 2021 to 11B in 2025, with net income surging from 1.39B to 2.27B. Its gross margin holds strong above 54%, while net margins improved to 20.6%, reflecting robust cost control and efficient capital allocation. The 2025 figures highlight accelerating EBIT growth of 44%, showcasing operational momentum.
IPG Photonics Corporation Analysis
IPGP’s revenue declined from 1.46B in 2021 to under 1B by 2024, dragging net income into negative territory at -181M. Gross margin contracted to 34.6%, with a net margin of -18.6%, signaling deteriorating profitability. The steep EBIT drop of 94% in 2024 underscores a sharp loss of operational leverage and momentum erosion.
Margin Dominance vs. Revenue Retraction
ADI clearly outperforms IPGP with consistently expanding revenues and strong margin expansion. IPGP’s shrinking top line and negative profitability mark a troubling reversal. For investors, ADI’s profile offers a reliable growth engine and margin resilience, standing as a more attractive core holding amid sector volatility.
Financial Ratios Comparison
These vital ratios act as a diagnostic tool to expose the underlying fiscal health, valuation premiums, and capital efficiency of the companies compared below:
| Ratios | Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 6.7% | -8.97% |
| ROIC | 5.5% | -9.97% |
| P/E | 51.1 | -17.8 |
| P/B | 3.42 | 1.59 |
| Current Ratio | 2.19 | 6.98 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.68 | 5.59 |
| D/E | 0.26 | 0.009 |
| Debt-to-Assets | 18.1% | 0.78% |
| Interest Coverage | 9.45 | 0 |
| Asset Turnover | 0.23 | 0.43 |
| Fixed Asset Turnover | 3.32 | 1.66 |
| Payout Ratio | 85% | 0% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.66% | 0% |
| Fiscal Year | 2025 | 2024 |
Efficiency & Valuation Duel: The Vital Signs
Financial ratios serve as a company’s DNA, exposing hidden risks and operational strengths crucial for informed investment decisions.
Analog Devices, Inc.
Analog Devices shows solid net margins at 20.58%, but its 6.7% ROE flags moderate profitability. The stock trades at a stretched P/E of 51.05 and a high P/B of 3.42, signaling expensive valuation. Shareholders receive a 1.66% dividend yield, reflecting moderate cash returns alongside reinvestment in R&D (16% of revenue).
IPG Photonics Corporation
IPG Photonics suffers from negative profitability, with ROE at -8.97% and net margin at -18.58%. Its P/E appears favorable due to negative earnings, but this masks operational weakness. The company carries no dividend, relying heavily on reinvestment. Strong liquidity and low leverage contrast sharply with its ongoing losses and poor returns.
Premium Valuation vs. Operational Safety
Analog Devices balances high valuation with moderate profitability and consistent dividends, reflecting stability with some risk on price. IPG Photonics, despite attractive leverage and liquidity, struggles with profitability and cash returns. Investors seeking operational safety may prefer Analog Devices, while those tolerant of risk might consider IPG’s turnaround potential.
Which one offers the Superior Shareholder Reward?
I compare Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) and IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) on their shareholder reward strategies. ADI pays a consistent dividend with a 1.66% yield and a high payout ratio around 85%, signaling a significant distribution of free cash flow. ADI also sustains buybacks, enhancing total returns. IPGP does not pay dividends but reinvests heavily in growth, reflected in its negative net margins and zero payout ratio. Its buyback intensity is unclear but likely limited given cash hoarding. ADI’s model balances income and capital return more sustainably. I believe ADI offers a superior total return profile for 2026 investors seeking both yield and buybacks.
Comparative Score Analysis: The Strategic Profile
The radar chart reveals the fundamental DNA and trade-offs of Analog Devices, Inc. and IPG Photonics Corporation, highlighting their financial strengths and valuation nuances:
Analog Devices shows balanced operational efficiency with moderate DCF, ROE, and ROA scores but struggles with valuation, especially its low P/E score indicating potential overvaluation risk. IPG Photonics leverages a stronger balance sheet, reflected in a superior debt-to-equity and price-to-book rating, but relies more heavily on this financial stability edge rather than operational profitability. Overall, IPG offers a more balanced profile from a capital structure perspective, while Analog Devices depends on consistent operational returns despite valuation headwinds.
Bankruptcy Risk: Solvency Showdown
The Altman Z-Score gap favors IPG Photonics, scoring 10.9 versus Analog Devices’ 7.1, both safely above distress thresholds but signaling IPG’s superior long-term solvency resilience in this cycle:
Financial Health: Quality of Operations
Both firms score a strong 7 on the Piotroski F-Score scale, indicating robust financial health. Neither shows red flags, but their operational quality remains a key strength supporting investor confidence:
How are the two companies positioned?
This section dissects ADI and IPGP’s operational DNA by comparing their revenue distribution by segment alongside internal strengths and weaknesses. The objective is to confront their economic moats and identify which model offers the most resilient, sustainable competitive advantage today.
Revenue Segmentation: The Strategic Mix
This comparison dissects how Analog Devices and IPG Photonics diversify their income streams and where their primary sector bets lie:
Analog Devices anchors its revenue in Industrial ($4.3B) with significant contributions from Automotive ($2.8B), Communications ($1.1B), and Consumer ($1.2B), showing a balanced mix. In contrast, IPG Photonics pivots heavily on High Power Continuous Wave Lasers ($333M), with other laser types contributing smaller shares. Analog Devices’ broad base mitigates risk and leverages diverse markets, while IPG’s focus on laser tech signals concentration risk but also strong niche dominance.
Strengths and Weaknesses Comparison
This table compares the strengths and weaknesses of Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) and IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP):
ADI Strengths
- Diverse revenue streams across Automotive, Industrial, Communications, Consumer sectors
- Favorable net margin at 20.58%
- Strong liquidity ratios: current 2.19, quick 1.68
- Low debt-to-assets at 18.05%
- Global presence with significant sales in US, China, Europe
- Favorable interest coverage at 9.54
IPGP Strengths
- Favorable debt levels with debt-to-assets 0.78%
- Infinite interest coverage signals no interest burden
- Quick ratio strong at 5.59
- Focused product innovation in laser systems and amplifiers
- Geographic diversification across North America, China, Europe
- Favorable P/E due to negative earnings
ADI Weaknesses
- Unfavorable ROE at 6.7%, below cost of capital
- High P/E of 51.05 indicates stretched valuation
- Unfavorable asset turnover at 0.23 hints at lower efficiency
- Unfavorable price-to-book at 3.42
- Neutral ROIC below WACC at 5.55% vs. 8.38% WACC
- Moderate dividend yield at 1.66%
IPGP Weaknesses
- Negative profitability with net margin -18.58% and ROE -8.97%
- Negative ROIC at -9.97% below WACC 8.57%
- Unfavorable current ratio at 6.98 suggests potential working capital imbalance
- Unfavorable dividend yield at zero
- Unfavorable asset turnover at 0.43 despite product focus
- Negative earnings impact valuation and raise risk
ADI’s diversified business model and solid liquidity underpin its moderate financial health despite some valuation and efficiency concerns. IPGP’s laser-focused innovation and very low leverage contrast with profitability challenges and working capital risks. Both must balance growth and capital efficiency in their strategic execution.
The Moat Duel: Analyzing Competitive Defensibility
A structural moat is the only reliable shield protecting long-term profits from relentless competition erosion. Let’s dissect the competitive moats of Analog Devices and IPG Photonics:
Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI): Integration and Innovation Moat
ADI’s moat stems from its intangible assets and integration expertise in analog and mixed-signal ICs. This delivers high gross margins (55%) and stable EBIT margins (27%), reflecting efficient capital use. Despite a current ROIC below WACC, its growing ROIC trend suggests improving profitability, with expansion in automotive and industrial markets deepening its moat in 2026.
IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP): Niche Technology Moat
IPGP’s competitive edge lies in specialized fiber laser technology, a niche intangible asset distinct from ADI’s scale integration. However, its weak margins and sharply declining ROIC reveal deteriorating value creation. Market contraction and limited diversification threaten its moat, though advancements in medical and communications lasers could offer rebound opportunities.
Verdict: Integration Scale vs. Niche Specialization
ADI’s broader, innovation-driven moat outmatches IPGP’s narrower niche technology moat. ADI’s improving profitability and diverse end markets better equip it to defend market share against competitive pressures in 2026.
Which stock offers better returns?
Over the past 12 months, both stocks have shown upward price movements with differing momentum and volatility, reflecting varied trading dynamics and investor interest.
Trend Comparison
Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) displays a strong bullish trend with a 58.66% price increase over 12 months, accelerating momentum, and high volatility indicated by a 26.38 standard deviation.
IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) has a mild bullish trend with a 2.4% price increase over the same period, also accelerating but with lower volatility at 9.36 standard deviation.
ADI’s price appreciation significantly outpaces IPGP’s, delivering the highest market performance with robust acceleration and notable price highs.
Target Prices
Analysts show a confident consensus on target prices for Analog Devices and IPG Photonics.
| Company | Target Low | Target High | Consensus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analog Devices, Inc. | 270 | 375 | 316 |
| IPG Photonics Corporation | 92 | 96 | 94 |
The target consensus for Analog Devices at $316 slightly exceeds its current price of $311, signaling moderate upside. IPG Photonics’ consensus at $94 aligns closely with its current $92 price, suggesting limited near-term movement.
Don’t Let Luck Decide Your Entry Point
Optimize your entry points with our advanced ProRealTime indicators. You’ll get efficient buy signals with precise price targets for maximum performance. Start outperforming now!
How do institutions grade them?
Analog Devices, Inc. Grades
The following table shows recent grades assigned to Analog Devices, Inc. by leading institutions.
| Grading Company | Action | New Grade | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Susquehanna | Maintain | Positive | 2026-01-22 |
| B of A Securities | Maintain | Buy | 2026-01-21 |
| Stifel | Maintain | Buy | 2026-01-16 |
| Oppenheimer | Maintain | Outperform | 2026-01-16 |
| Wells Fargo | Upgrade | Overweight | 2026-01-15 |
| Citigroup | Maintain | Buy | 2026-01-15 |
| Keybanc | Maintain | Overweight | 2026-01-13 |
| Truist Securities | Maintain | Hold | 2025-12-19 |
| UBS | Maintain | Buy | 2025-12-08 |
| Truist Securities | Maintain | Hold | 2025-11-26 |
IPG Photonics Corporation Grades
The following table shows recent grades assigned to IPG Photonics Corporation by leading institutions.
| Grading Company | Action | New Grade | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citigroup | Upgrade | Buy | 2025-11-05 |
| Bernstein | Upgrade | Outperform | 2025-08-07 |
| Raymond James | Maintain | Strong Buy | 2025-05-07 |
| CL King | Upgrade | Buy | 2025-03-18 |
| Citigroup | Maintain | Sell | 2025-02-18 |
| Stifel | Maintain | Buy | 2025-02-12 |
| Needham | Maintain | Hold | 2025-02-12 |
| Seaport Global | Downgrade | Neutral | 2024-08-01 |
| Stifel | Maintain | Buy | 2024-07-31 |
| Raymond James | Maintain | Strong Buy | 2024-07-31 |
Which company has the best grades?
Analog Devices, Inc. consistently receives Buy or better ratings, including recent upgrades. IPG Photonics shows mixed grades, with some upgrades but also a notable Sell. Investors may view Analog Devices as more favorably graded overall.
Risks specific to each company
The following categories identify the critical pressure points and systemic threats facing both firms in the 2026 market environment:
1. Market & Competition
Analog Devices, Inc.
- Faces intense rivalry in semiconductors, pressured by high P/E and asset turnover concerns.
IPG Photonics Corporation
- Operates in niche fiber lasers but suffers from negative margins and profitability risks.
2. Capital Structure & Debt
Analog Devices, Inc.
- Maintains a conservative debt-to-equity ratio (0.26) and strong interest coverage (9.54).
IPG Photonics Corporation
- Extremely low leverage (D/E 0.01) with infinite interest coverage, indicating financial stability.
3. Stock Volatility
Analog Devices, Inc.
- Beta near 1.03 signals market-correlated volatility, typical for tech sector leaders.
IPG Photonics Corporation
- Beta close to 1.02 shows moderate volatility aligned with overall market swings.
4. Regulatory & Legal
Analog Devices, Inc.
- Exposure to international regulations given global operations.
IPG Photonics Corporation
- Risks tied to export controls on advanced laser technologies.
5. Supply Chain & Operations
Analog Devices, Inc.
- Complex global supply chains vulnerable to semiconductor shortages.
IPG Photonics Corporation
- Relies on specialized components, with potential bottlenecks in fiber laser production.
6. ESG & Climate Transition
Analog Devices, Inc.
- Increasing pressure to improve energy-efficient product lines amid industrial demand.
IPG Photonics Corporation
- Faces challenges aligning fiber laser production with evolving climate standards.
7. Geopolitical Exposure
Analog Devices, Inc.
- Significant sales in China and Asia; vulnerable to US-China tech tensions.
IPG Photonics Corporation
- Also exposed to geopolitical risks affecting high-tech exports and supply chains.
Which company shows a better risk-adjusted profile?
Analog Devices’ main risk lies in market competition and stretched valuation metrics. IPG Photonics struggles with sustained negative profitability and operational risks. Despite its financial losses, IPG’s stronger balance sheet and lower leverage provide some cushion. Overall, Analog Devices exhibits a better risk-adjusted profile given its favorable debt metrics and safer Altman Z-score, but investors must watch valuation pressures closely.
Final Verdict: Which stock to choose?
Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) wields unmatched efficiency in its sector, consistently growing profitability despite value erosion signs. Its solid balance sheet and strong cash flow generation are points of vigilance amid high valuation multiples. ADI suits investors seeking aggressive growth with tolerance for premium pricing.
IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) commands a strategic moat through financial resilience and low leverage, offering relative safety compared to ADI. However, its declining profitability and negative returns represent a cautionary signal. IPGP fits portfolios aiming for growth at a reasonable price, accepting some operational volatility.
If you prioritize robust operational momentum and can absorb valuation premiums, ADI is the compelling choice due to accelerating earnings and cash flow strength. However, if you seek financial stability with moderate growth and lower leverage risk, IPGP offers better stability despite weaker profitability. Both stocks present distinct risk-reward profiles aligned with different investor strategies.
Disclaimer: Investment carries a risk of loss of initial capital. The past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Be sure to understand risks before making an investment decision.
Go Further
I encourage you to read the complete analyses of Analog Devices, Inc. and IPG Photonics Corporation to enhance your investment decisions:
