Home > Comparison > Technology > ACN vs WIT
The strategic rivalry between Accenture plc and Wipro Limited shapes the global IT services landscape. Accenture, a high-margin technology consulting powerhouse, contrasts with Wipro’s diversified IT and business process services with strong Indian market ties. This head-to-head pits Accenture’s scale and innovation against Wipro’s cost-efficiency and regional focus. This analysis will reveal which company offers a superior risk-adjusted growth trajectory for a diversified portfolio in the competitive technology sector.
Table of contents
Companies Overview
Accenture and Wipro Limited occupy pivotal roles in the global IT services landscape, each commanding significant influence within their regions.
Accenture plc: Global IT Services Powerhouse
Accenture leads as a professional services firm specializing in strategy, consulting, technology, and operations. Its core revenue stems from digital transformation, agile application services, and intelligent automation. In 2026, Accenture sharpens its focus on cloud innovation, cybersecurity, and sustainable technology solutions to maintain its competitive edge.
Wipro Limited: Indian IT and Consulting Specialist
Wipro operates as a comprehensive IT and consulting company, generating revenue through IT services, products, and government contracts. Its segments include IT services, IT products, and India State Run Enterprise Services. Wipro’s 2026 strategy emphasizes customer-centric design, cloud infrastructure, and expanding service reach across Indian government and enterprise sectors.
Strategic Collision: Similarities & Divergences
Both companies prioritize digital transformation and cloud-based solutions but differ in business models. Accenture embraces a global, diversified consulting approach, while Wipro focuses on the Indian market with strong government ties. Their primary battleground lies in delivering end-to-end IT services. Investors face contrasting profiles: Accenture offers global scale and innovation leadership; Wipro provides regional specialization and government sector exposure.
Income Statement Comparison
This data dissects the core profitability and scalability of both corporate engines to reveal who dominates the bottom line:
| Metric | Accenture plc (ACN) | Wipro Limited (WIT) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 69.7B USD | 901.3B INR |
| Cost of Revenue | 47.4B USD | 625.1B INR |
| Operating Expenses | 12.0B USD | 122.7B INR |
| Gross Profit | 22.2B USD | 276.3B INR |
| EBITDA | 12.9B USD | 220.5B INR |
| EBIT | 10.5B USD | 191.7B INR |
| Interest Expense | 229M USD | 14.9B INR |
| Net Income | 7.7B USD | 132.9B INR |
| EPS | 12.29 USD | 12.56 INR |
| Fiscal Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Income Statement Analysis: The Bottom-Line Duel
This income statement comparison exposes which company runs the more efficient and profitable corporate engine in 2025.
Accenture plc Analysis
Accenture’s revenue climbs steadily to $69.7B in 2025, up 7.4% from 2024. Net income follows, reaching $7.7B, reflecting robust earnings power. Gross margin holds favorably at 31.9%, while net margin remains healthy at 11%. Efficiency gains show in a 7.6% EBIT growth, signaling strong operational momentum despite a slight net margin dip.
Wipro Limited Analysis
Wipro’s revenue dips slightly by 0.2% to ₹901B in 2025, yet net income rises sharply by 19.8% to ₹133B. The company sustains a solid gross margin near 30.7%, with an impressive net margin of 14.7%. EBIT growth at 19% highlights operational leverage. Despite top-line softness, Wipro’s bottom-line momentum and margin expansion stand out in this cycle.
Margin Power vs. Revenue Scale
Accenture delivers consistent revenue growth and stable margins, emphasizing scale and efficiency. Wipro impresses with superior net and EBIT margin expansion and higher net income growth rate despite flat revenue. Fundamentally, Accenture leads in scale and steady margin health. Investors seeking growth with operational steadiness may find Accenture’s profile more attractive.
Financial Ratios Comparison
These vital ratios act as a diagnostic tool to expose the underlying fiscal health, valuation premiums, and capital efficiency of the companies compared below:
| Ratios | Accenture plc (ACN) | Wipro Limited (WIT) |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 24.6% | 16.0% |
| ROIC | 17.0% | 10.5% |
| P/E | 21.2 | 20.6 |
| P/B | 5.21 | 3.30 |
| Current Ratio | 1.42 | 2.72 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.42 | 2.71 |
| D/E | 0.26 | 0.23 |
| Debt-to-Assets | 12.5% | 14.9% |
| Interest Coverage | 44.7 | 10.3 |
| Asset Turnover | 1.07 | 0.70 |
| Fixed Asset Turnover | 16.2 | 8.48 |
| Payout Ratio | 48.2% | 47.2% |
| Dividend Yield | 2.28% | 2.29% |
| Fiscal Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Efficiency & Valuation Duel: The Vital Signs
Ratios act as a company’s DNA, revealing hidden risks and operational excellence that drive long-term investor value and strategic positioning.
Accenture plc
Accenture posts a strong 24.6% ROE and an 11% net margin, showcasing robust profitability. Its P/E ratio of 21.16 signals a fair valuation, though a high P/B at 5.21 suggests some premium pricing. The firm rewards shareholders with a 2.28% dividend yield, reflecting steady cash returns alongside reinvestment in operational efficiency.
Wipro Limited
Wipro delivers a solid 16% ROE and a superior 14.7% net margin, indicating efficient operations. Its P/E ratio of 20.6 remains reasonable, supported by a lower P/B of 3.3. The company offers a 2.29% dividend yield, balancing shareholder returns with ongoing investments in growth and R&D to sustain its competitive edge.
Premium Valuation vs. Operational Safety
Accenture’s higher profitability and return metrics justify its premium valuation but come with a stretched P/B ratio. Wipro offers more operational safety with a very favorable ratio profile and slightly better dividend yield. Accenture fits investors seeking growth, while Wipro suits those prioritizing steadier fundamentals.
Which one offers the Superior Shareholder Reward?
I find Accenture (ACN) balances dividends and buybacks more effectively than Wipro (WIT). ACN pays a 2.28% yield with a 48% payout ratio, well covered by free cash flow, and maintains aggressive buybacks. WIT offers a similar yield (~2.29%) but with a volatile payout ratio and modest buyback activity. ACN’s distribution is sustainable, backed by robust margins and cash flow, supporting steady shareholder returns. WIT reinvests heavily but lacks the buyback intensity. For 2026, ACN delivers a superior total return profile through disciplined capital allocation and a reliable income stream.
Comparative Score Analysis: The Strategic Profile
The radar chart reveals the fundamental DNA and trade-offs of Accenture plc and Wipro Limited, highlighting their strategic financial strengths and weaknesses:
Accenture scores higher on ROE (5 vs. 4) and ROA (5 vs. 4), reflecting superior profitability and asset efficiency. Wipro leads in discounted cash flow (5 vs. 4), suggesting better valuation potential. Both show moderate debt-to-equity and valuation scores, but Accenture’s profile leans on operational excellence, while Wipro balances valuation and cash flow advantages.
Bankruptcy Risk: Solvency Showdown
Accenture’s Altman Z-Score of 5.45 places it firmly in the safe zone, indicating robust financial stability. Wipro’s 2.26 score falls in the grey zone, signaling moderate bankruptcy risk amid economic headwinds:
Financial Health: Quality of Operations
Both companies exhibit average Piotroski F-Scores, with Accenture at 6 and Wipro at 5. Neither shows severe red flags, but Accenture’s slightly stronger score suggests marginally better internal financial health and operational quality:
How are the two companies positioned?
This section dissects Accenture and Wipro’s operational DNA by comparing revenue distribution and internal dynamics. The goal is to confront their economic moats and identify which business model offers the most resilient competitive advantage today.
Revenue Segmentation: The Strategic Mix
This visual comparison dissects how Accenture plc and Wipro Limited diversify their income streams and where their primary sector bets lie:
Accenture shows a clear dual focus with Consulting at $35B and Outsourcing near $34.6B in 2025. This balance suggests robust service diversification and ecosystem lock-in. Wipro lacks available segment data, preventing segmentation analysis. Accenture’s reliance on two large, complementary segments reduces concentration risk and anchors its infrastructure dominance in professional services. This strategic mix contrasts sharply with Wipro’s opaque revenue breakdown.
Strengths and Weaknesses Comparison
This table compares the Strengths and Weaknesses of Accenture plc and Wipro Limited:
Accenture plc Strengths
- Strong diversification with consulting and outsourcing revenues
- Favorable profitability metrics including 11% net margin and 17% ROIC
- High asset turnover reflects operational efficiency
- Solid global presence with significant North America and Europe revenues
- Favorable debt ratios and interest coverage support financial stability
Wipro Limited Strengths
- Higher net margin at 14.7% indicating strong profitability
- Very favorable WACC at 6.38% lowers capital costs
- Strong liquidity with current ratio of 2.72
- Favorable fixed asset turnover and dividend yield
- Favorable debt ratios indicate conservative leverage
Accenture plc Weaknesses
- Unfavorable price-to-book ratio suggests possible overvaluation
- Neutral current ratio risks indicate moderate liquidity balance
- Slightly lower WACC than ROIC but not strongly favorable
- Limited detailed geographic revenue segmentation in recent years
Wipro Limited Weaknesses
- Unfavorable price-to-book ratio hints at valuation concerns
- Neutral asset turnover of 0.7 indicates less efficiency than peer
- Limited disclosed geographic and segment revenue data restricts diversification analysis
Both companies show strong profitability and conservative leverage. Accenture’s broad geographic reach contrasts with Wipro’s more limited disclosure. Valuation concerns via price-to-book ratios merit investor attention.
The Moat Duel: Analyzing Competitive Defensibility
A structural moat is the only true barrier protecting long-term profits from relentless competitive erosion. Let’s dissect the defensive strengths of two industry players:
Accenture plc: Deep Expertise and Scale Moat
Accenture’s moat stems from its intangible assets and extensive global network, delivering stable margins and a 7.6% ROIC premium over WACC. Its broad consulting and technology services portfolio fuels expansion but faces margin pressure as ROIC trends down.
Wipro Limited: Cost-Effective Delivery Moat
Wipro’s cost advantage and diversified IT services underpin a solid 4.1% ROIC excess over WACC, outperforming peers on margin growth. Yet, declining ROIC signals profitability risks, though its India-focused market offers avenues for scaling and process innovation.
Global Consulting Scale vs. Cost Leadership Efficiency
Accenture commands a wider moat through scale, brand, and innovation, despite a shrinking ROIC. Wipro’s cost moat is narrower but supported by improving margins and growth potential in emerging markets. Accenture remains better positioned to defend its market share long term.
Which stock offers better returns?
The past year reveals contrasting dynamics between Accenture plc and Wipro Limited, with Accenture experiencing a pronounced decline yet showing recent recovery, while Wipro trends down with slowing momentum.
Trend Comparison
Accenture plc shows a 30.29% price decline over the past 12 months, a bearish trend with accelerating downside volatility and a price range from 388.0 to 238.39. Recent weeks reveal a 7.52% price rebound, indicating potential short-term recovery.
Wipro Limited’s stock fell 18.45% over the last year, marking a bearish trend with decelerating decline and minimal volatility between 3.77 and 2.52. The recent period reflects a continued 4.91% drop, highlighting ongoing weakness.
Comparing both, Accenture’s larger overall loss contrasts with its recent positive momentum, while Wipro maintains a steadier but persistent decline. Accenture has delivered lower market performance over 12 months despite late-stage gains.
Target Prices
Analysts present a positive consensus for both Accenture plc and Wipro Limited, indicating upside potential from current prices.
| Company | Target Low | Target High | Consensus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accenture plc | 265 | 330 | 302.93 |
| Wipro Limited | 7 | 7.7 | 7.35 |
Accenture’s consensus target stands about 15% above its current price of 264, signaling expected growth. Wipro’s target consensus exceeds its current price of 2.52 by nearly 192%, reflecting more aggressive upside expectations.
Don’t Let Luck Decide Your Entry Point
Optimize your entry points with our advanced ProRealTime indicators. You’ll get efficient buy signals with precise price targets for maximum performance. Start outperforming now!
How do institutions grade them?
Accenture plc Grades
The table below summarizes recent institutional grades for Accenture plc:
| Grading Company | Action | New Grade | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo | Maintain | Equal Weight | 2026-01-14 |
| UBS | Maintain | Buy | 2025-12-19 |
| Susquehanna | Maintain | Neutral | 2025-12-19 |
| RBC Capital | Maintain | Outperform | 2025-12-19 |
| Morgan Stanley | Upgrade | Overweight | 2025-12-16 |
| Mizuho | Maintain | Outperform | 2025-09-29 |
| Evercore ISI Group | Maintain | Outperform | 2025-09-26 |
| BMO Capital | Maintain | Market Perform | 2025-09-26 |
| TD Cowen | Maintain | Buy | 2025-09-26 |
| Goldman Sachs | Maintain | Buy | 2025-09-26 |
Wipro Limited Grades
The table below summarizes recent institutional grades for Wipro Limited:
| Grading Company | Action | New Grade | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| UBS | Upgrade | Neutral | 2025-01-02 |
| Wedbush | Maintain | Underperform | 2024-01-16 |
| JP Morgan | Maintain | Underweight | 2023-05-24 |
| Bernstein | Downgrade | Underperform | 2023-03-22 |
| Bernstein | Downgrade | Underperform | 2023-03-21 |
| Goldman Sachs | Upgrade | Buy | 2022-09-13 |
| Goldman Sachs | Upgrade | Buy | 2022-09-12 |
| Morgan Stanley | Downgrade | Underweight | 2022-07-14 |
| Morgan Stanley | Downgrade | Underweight | 2022-07-13 |
| Macquarie | Upgrade | Outperform | 2022-06-02 |
Which company has the best grades?
Accenture has consistently received stronger grades, including multiple Buy, Outperform, and Overweight ratings from top firms. Wipro’s grades are mixed with several Underperform and Underweight ratings. This suggests Accenture currently enjoys more institutional confidence, which may influence investor sentiment and valuation.
Risks specific to each company
In 2026, the following categories identify the critical pressure points and systemic threats facing both Accenture plc and Wipro Limited in the current market environment:
1. Market & Competition
Accenture plc
- Dominates global IT consulting with strong innovation but faces intense competition from niche digital disruptors.
Wipro Limited
- Competes mainly in India with diversified IT services but contends with rising domestic and international rivals.
2. Capital Structure & Debt
Accenture plc
- Maintains low debt-to-equity (0.26) and strong interest coverage (45.94), supporting financial flexibility.
Wipro Limited
- Also holds low leverage (0.23 D/E) but has lower interest coverage (12.83), indicating moderate debt service risk.
3. Stock Volatility
Accenture plc
- Beta at 1.249 signals higher price volatility relative to the market, reflecting sensitivity to economic cycles.
Wipro Limited
- Beta of 0.555 denotes lower volatility, offering more stability but possibly less upside in bull markets.
4. Regulatory & Legal
Accenture plc
- Faces strict international compliance across multiple jurisdictions with potential policy shifts impacting operations.
Wipro Limited
- Encounters regulatory complexity in India’s evolving IT and government sectors, with state-run enterprise exposure.
5. Supply Chain & Operations
Accenture plc
- Relies on a global talent pool and technology partners, vulnerable to geopolitical disruptions and talent shortages.
Wipro Limited
- Operations concentrated in India provide cost advantages but risk local infrastructure and labor market challenges.
6. ESG & Climate Transition
Accenture plc
- Strong ESG commitments align with client demands, though transition costs and reporting requirements add pressure.
Wipro Limited
- ESG efforts growing, but lag behind global peers, risking reputational and compliance gaps.
7. Geopolitical Exposure
Accenture plc
- Broad multinational footprint exposes it to US-China tensions and EU regulatory shifts.
Wipro Limited
- Heavy reliance on Indian market and government contracts creates vulnerability to domestic political risks.
Which company shows a better risk-adjusted profile?
Accenture’s principal risk lies in market volatility and global regulatory complexity, while Wipro’s biggest challenge is geopolitical concentration and operational risks in India. Despite Accenture’s higher stock volatility, its superior Altman Z-Score (5.45 vs. 2.26) and robust interest coverage signal stronger financial resilience. Wipro’s very favorable rating and lower beta suggest stability but highlight moderate default risk in the “grey zone.” I judge Accenture to have a better risk-adjusted profile, driven by stronger capital structure metrics and global diversification, although investors must monitor valuation pressures given its elevated price-to-book ratio.
Final Verdict: Which stock to choose?
Accenture’s superpower lies in its unmatched operational efficiency and robust cash generation. It consistently delivers high returns on invested capital, signaling strong value creation despite a slight decline in profitability. A point of vigilance remains its premium valuation, which could temper upside. It fits well in portfolios oriented toward aggressive growth with a tolerance for valuation risk.
Wipro’s strategic moat centers on its resilient margin profile and solid balance sheet, supported by a notably high current ratio. It offers a more conservative risk profile compared to Accenture, with steady cash flow and attractive free cash flow yield. This positions Wipro as a solid candidate for Growth at a Reasonable Price (GARP) investors seeking stability alongside growth.
If you prioritize operational excellence and can weather valuation premiums, Accenture stands out due to its superior cash conversion and return metrics. However, if you seek a more balanced risk-return tradeoff with a defensive edge, Wipro offers better stability and a very favorable financial rating. Each appeals to distinct investor avatars, reflecting different appetites for growth and risk.
Disclaimer: Investment carries a risk of loss of initial capital. The past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Be sure to understand risks before making an investment decision.
Go Further
I encourage you to read the complete analyses of Accenture plc and Wipro Limited to enhance your investment decisions:
