Accenture vs Cognizant: Which IT Stock Shows Stronger Value?

Home > Comparison > Technology > ACN vs CTSH

The strategic rivalry between Accenture plc and Cognizant Technology Solutions shapes the trajectory of the global technology services sector. Accenture operates as a diversified consulting and digital transformation powerhouse, while Cognizant focuses on specialized outsourcing and industry-specific technology solutions. This head-to-head highlights a contest between scale-driven innovation and targeted operational efficiency. This analysis evaluates which corporate model delivers superior risk-adjusted returns for a diversified investment portfolio in 2026.

Table of contents

• Companies Overview
• Income Statement Comparison
• Financial Ratios Comparison
• How are the two companies positioned?
• Which stock offers better returns?
• How do institutions grade them?
• Risks specific to each company
• Final Verdict: Which stock to choose?

Companies Overview

Accenture and Cognizant stand as pivotal players shaping global IT services and digital transformation.

Accenture: Global Leader in Digital Transformation

Accenture dominates as a professional services powerhouse, generating revenue from consulting, technology, and operations services worldwide. Its core strengths include agile application services, intelligent automation, and cloud infrastructure. In 2026, it focuses strategically on digital industrial workforce solutions and cybersecurity, reinforcing its competitive advantage in end-to-end digital transformation.

Cognizant: Specialist in Sector-Focused IT Services

Cognizant specializes in consultancy and outsourcing, with revenue driven by segment-specific solutions for financial services, healthcare, and communications. Its 2026 strategy emphasizes customer experience, robotic process automation, and AI to enhance operational efficiency. This market position centers on delivering tailored technology solutions across key industries.

Strategic Collision: Similarities & Divergences

Both firms excel in IT consulting but diverge in scope: Accenture pursues broad digital innovation; Cognizant targets vertical specialization. The primary battleground is digital automation and AI services. Accenture’s expansive portfolio contrasts with Cognizant’s focused industry approach, defining distinct investment profiles in scale and market reach.

Income Statement Comparison

This data dissects the core profitability and scalability of both corporate engines to reveal who dominates the bottom line:

Metric	Accenture plc (ACN)	Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH)
Revenue	69.7B	21.1B
Cost of Revenue	47.4B	14.0B
Operating Expenses	12.0B	3.6B
Gross Profit	22.2B	7.1B
EBITDA	12.9B	4.2B
EBIT	10.5B	3.6B
Interest Expense	229M	37M
Net Income	7.7B	2.2B
EPS	12.29	4.56
Fiscal Year	2025	2025

Income Statement Analysis: The Bottom-Line Duel

This income statement comparison exposes how each company’s revenue and profit engines perform under market pressure and operational demands.

Accenture plc Analysis

Accenture’s revenue climbed steadily from 50.5B in 2021 to 69.7B in 2025, reflecting a robust 38% growth over five years. Net income followed suit, rising from 5.9B to 7.7B, albeit with a slight net margin compression to 11%. The 2025 gross margin of 31.9% and EBIT margin near 15% signal efficient cost management and strong operating leverage.

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation Analysis

Cognizant’s revenue grew more modestly, from 18.5B in 2021 to 21.1B in 2025, a 14% increase. Net income showed limited expansion, hovering around 2.1B to 2.2B, with a net margin just above 10%. Its 2025 gross margin of 33.7% and EBIT margin of 17.2% highlight solid profitability, yet slower momentum compared to peers.

Verdict: Growth Scale vs. Margin Efficiency

Accenture commands a clear lead in revenue and net income growth, showcasing scalable operations with healthy margin retention. Cognizant posts higher margins but lags in top-line expansion and net income growth. For investors, Accenture’s profile offers a compelling growth trajectory, while Cognizant appeals more to those prioritizing margin strength over rapid scale.

Financial Ratios Comparison

These vital ratios act as a diagnostic tool to expose the underlying fiscal health, valuation premiums, and capital efficiency of the companies compared below:

Ratios	Accenture plc (ACN)	Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH)
ROE	24.6%	0%
ROIC	17.0%	0%
P/E	21.2	17.9
P/B	5.21	0
Current Ratio	1.42	0
Quick Ratio	1.42	0
D/E (Debt-to-Equity)	0.26	0
Debt-to-Assets	12.5%	0%
Interest Coverage	44.7	95.4
Asset Turnover	1.07	0
Fixed Asset Turnover	16.2	0
Payout ratio	48.2%	27.4%
Dividend yield	2.28%	1.53%
Fiscal Year	2025	2025

Efficiency & Valuation Duel: The Vital Signs

Financial ratios act as a company’s DNA, exposing hidden risks and revealing operational excellence that shapes investor decisions.

Accenture plc

Accenture posts a robust ROE of 24.61% and a net margin of 11.02%, signaling strong profitability. Its P/E ratio of 21.16 suggests a fairly valued stock, while a high P/B of 5.21 raises concerns. The company returns value with a 2.28% dividend yield, balancing growth and shareholder income effectively.

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation

Cognizant’s net margin is solid at 10.56%, but zero reported ROE and ROIC indicate weak profitability metrics or data gaps. Its P/E of 17.9 appears reasonable, and the absence of debt is favorable. Dividend yield sits at 1.53%, showing moderate shareholder returns amid operational uncertainties.

Balanced Profitability vs. Valuation Ambiguity

Accenture offers a better balance of profitability and shareholder returns despite a stretched P/B ratio. Cognizant’s unclear profitability metrics and lower dividend yield elevate risk. Investors seeking stable operational performance may favor Accenture; those prioritizing valuation might find Cognizant’s profile more speculative.

Which one offers the Superior Shareholder Reward?

I see Accenture (ACN) pays a higher dividend yield at 2.28% with a payout ratio near 48%, well-covered by free cash flow (FCF). Its robust buyback program further boosts shareholder returns. Cognizant (CTSH) offers a lower 1.53% yield, with a more conservative 27% payout. CTSH invests heavily in growth, but its buybacks are less intense. Historically, Accenture’s balanced distribution—solid dividends and aggressive buybacks—sustains long-term value better than Cognizant’s growth-focused model. I conclude Accenture delivers the superior total shareholder reward in 2026.

Comparative Score Analysis: The Strategic Profile

The radar chart reveals the fundamental DNA and trade-offs of Accenture plc and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, highlighting their investment strengths and weaknesses:

Accenture excels in return on equity (5) and return on assets (5), demonstrating operational efficiency. However, it carries higher financial risk with a debt-to-equity score of 2 and shows moderate valuation scores (P/E and P/B at 2). Cognizant maintains a more balanced profile with solid asset returns (5), slightly lower equity returns (4), and better debt management (3) plus valuation scores (3). Cognizant relies less on operational leverage and more on steadier financial footing compared to Accenture’s sharper equity edge.

Bankruptcy Risk: Solvency Showdown

The Altman Z-Score comparison shows both firms in the safe zone with scores of 5.29 (Accenture) and 6.90 (Cognizant), indicating strong solvency and low bankruptcy risk in this economic cycle:

Financial Health: Quality of Operations

Cognizant’s Piotroski F-Score of 7 suggests stronger internal financial health compared to Accenture’s 6, signaling fewer red flags and better operational quality:

How are the two companies positioned?

This section dissects the operational DNA of Accenture and Cognizant by comparing their revenue distribution and internal dynamics. The goal is to confront their economic moats to identify the more resilient and sustainable competitive advantage today.

Revenue Segmentation: The Strategic Mix

The following visual comparison dissects how Accenture plc and Cognizant Technology Solutions diversify their income streams and where their primary sector bets lie:

Accenture pivots on two massive segments: Consulting at $35.1B and Outsourcing at $34.6B, showing a balanced dual-core revenue model. In contrast, Cognizant’s revenue splits more evenly across four sectors, with Financial Services anchoring at $5.75B and Healthcare close behind at $5.93B. Accenture’s concentration signals strong ecosystem lock-in risk but benefits from infrastructure dominance. Cognizant’s spread reduces dependency risk but lacks a singular commanding moat.

Strengths and Weaknesses Comparison

This table compares the Strengths and Weaknesses of Accenture plc and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation:

Overall, Accenture demonstrates robust profitability and diversified global operations, though valuation metrics suggest caution. Cognizant faces significant challenges in capital efficiency and liquidity, which could constrain its financial flexibility and growth opportunities.

The Moat Duel: Analyzing Competitive Defensibility

A structural moat protects long-term profits from competition’s relentless erosion. Only a genuine moat withstands market pressures and sustains value creation:

Accenture plc: Scale and Diversification Moat

Accenture leverages a diverse global presence and scale, driving high ROIC above WACC. Its broad service portfolio stabilizes margins. Expansion into AI and cloud deepens its moat in 2026.

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation: Niche Market Specialization

Cognizant’s moat centers on specialized industry expertise and client relationships, contrasting Accenture’s scale. It delivers strong EBIT margin growth but faces challenges sustaining ROIC trends. New digital healthcare services offer growth potential.

Verdict: Scale and Diversification vs. Niche Expertise

Accenture’s wider moat stems from consistent value creation and geographic reach, despite a slight ROIC decline. Cognizant’s more volatile moat lacks clear ROIC advantage. Accenture is better positioned to defend market share in an intensifying competitive landscape.

Which stock offers better returns?

The past year shows contrasting dynamics: Accenture plc’s stock declined sharply with accelerating losses, while Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation posted a modest but steady gain.

Trend Comparison

Accenture plc’s stock fell 35.49% over the past year, marking a bearish trend with accelerating decline and wide volatility between 238.39 and 388.0. Recent months show a slight negative slope despite buyer dominance.

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation’s share price rose 1.83%, showing a bullish but modest acceleration with lower volatility. The recent trend remains positive, supported by steady buyer interest.

Cognizant delivered the highest market performance, outperforming Accenture’s sizable loss in the same period despite both showing buyer dominance in recent trading.

Target Prices

Analysts project solid upside potential across these IT services leaders, reflecting confidence in their strategic positioning.

Company	Target Low	Target High	Consensus
Accenture plc	265	330	302.93
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation	82	107	94.44

The consensus targets for Accenture and Cognizant sit well above current prices, indicating expected growth. Accenture’s 25% upside contrasts with Cognizant’s roughly 23% potential, suggesting attractive entry points for long-term investors.

How do institutions grade them?

Here is a comparison of the latest reliable institutional grades for Accenture plc and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation:

Accenture plc Grades

The table below shows recent grades and actions from well-known financial institutions for Accenture plc.

Grading Company	Action	New Grade	Date
Wells Fargo	Maintain	Equal Weight	2026-01-14
Susquehanna	Maintain	Neutral	2025-12-19
RBC Capital	Maintain	Outperform	2025-12-19
UBS	Maintain	Buy	2025-12-19
Morgan Stanley	Upgrade	Overweight	2025-12-16
Mizuho	Maintain	Outperform	2025-09-29
JP Morgan	Maintain	Overweight	2025-09-26
Guggenheim	Maintain	Buy	2025-09-26
TD Cowen	Maintain	Buy	2025-09-26
Baird	Maintain	Outperform	2025-09-26

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation Grades

Below are recent grades and actions from reputable grading companies for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation.

Grading Company	Action	New Grade	Date
Guggenheim	Maintain	Buy	2026-01-28
Citigroup	Maintain	Neutral	2026-01-22
Wells Fargo	Maintain	Overweight	2026-01-14
TD Cowen	Maintain	Hold	2026-01-09
UBS	Maintain	Neutral	2025-12-08
William Blair	Upgrade	Outperform	2025-11-21
UBS	Maintain	Neutral	2025-10-30
Wells Fargo	Maintain	Overweight	2025-10-30
RBC Capital	Maintain	Sector Perform	2025-10-30
JP Morgan	Maintain	Overweight	2025-10-30

Which company has the best grades?

Accenture holds stronger grades overall, with multiple “Buy,” “Outperform,” and “Overweight” ratings, including a recent upgrade from Morgan Stanley. Cognizant’s grades lean toward “Neutral” and “Overweight,” with fewer upgrades. Investors may view Accenture’s higher consensus grades as a signal of greater confidence from analysts.

Risks specific to each company

The following categories identify critical pressure points and systemic threats facing both firms in the 2026 market environment:

1. Market & Competition

2. Capital Structure & Debt

3. Stock Volatility

4. Regulatory & Legal

5. Supply Chain & Operations

6. ESG & Climate Transition

7. Geopolitical Exposure

Which company shows a better risk-adjusted profile?

Accenture’s main risk lies in geopolitical and regulatory complexity due to its global scale. Cognizant faces capital structure and operational concentration risks. I see Accenture’s diversified business and stronger financial ratios delivering a better risk-adjusted profile, supported by its 16.99% ROIC versus Cognizant’s missing data, signaling more consistent value creation.

Final Verdict: Which stock to choose?

Accenture’s superpower lies in its unmatched operational efficiency and robust capital returns, consistently creating value above its cost of capital. Its point of vigilance is a slightly declining profitability trend, which could signal emerging competitive pressures. This stock suits portfolios aiming for aggressive growth with a tolerance for cyclical shifts.

Cognizant’s strategic moat is grounded in its strong recurring revenue model and conservative balance sheet, offering steadier cash flow stability compared to Accenture. While its growth metrics lag, its valuation profile suggests a more defensive stance. It fits well within Growth at a Reasonable Price (GARP) portfolios seeking stability amid modest expansion.

If you prioritize dynamic value creation and operational excellence, Accenture outshines due to its superior returns on invested capital and market leadership. However, if you seek better stability and a more conservative risk profile, Cognizant offers a compelling scenario with a steadier cash flow base despite slower growth. Both present distinct analytical cases depending on your investment strategy and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer: Investment carries a risk of loss of initial capital. The past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Be sure to understand risks before making an investment decision.

Go Further

I encourage you to read the complete analyses of Accenture plc and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation to enhance your investment decisions:

• Accenture plc Analysis
• Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation Analysis